1684
S. Bouvet et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 56 (2015) 1682–1686
any particular handling precautions and the reaction was then left
to stir at room temperature for 3 h. We were pleased to achieve, in
poor but very encouraging yields, the formation of difluoro deriva-
tive 4a. With 10 equiv of IL, the yield was slightly improved (entry
2). Addition of a supplementary source of fluoride, such as KF or
CsF dissolved in methanol, was not beneficial (entries 3 and 4).
The increase in the number of equivalents of NBS (to a maximum
of 12) allowed the isolation of 4a with an acceptable yield of 40%
(entries 5–8). The presence of a minimum amount of dichloro-
methane (4 ml) was added to simply avoid stirring problems. The
use of other N-halo imides proved inefficient, giving rise either to
complete degradation of the substrate (entries 9 and 10) or to no
conversion at all (entries 11 and 12).
Whatever the conditions employed, no trifluoromethyl ether
was even formed, only the difluoro(methylthio)methyl ethers
were. As a first conclusion, [bdmim][F] appears not as an equiva-
lent of HF–pyridine but more like an analogue of TBAH2F3, the lat-
ter being often prepared with HF. In this context, we were happy to
describe the fluorination of a xanthate with simple IL as a fluoride
source.
The previously optimized conditions (12 equiv of NBS, 10 equiv
of [bdmim][F]) were successfully applied to a wide range of sub-
strates to give rise to the corresponding difluoro(methylth-
io)methyl ethers 4a–f with correct yields for aromatic compounds
(entries 1–6) to low yields for aliphatic series (entries 7 and 8).
The compounds are nevertheless isolated in similar or better yields
compared to the literature. As the conversion was always almost
total, a careful investigation of the numerous side-products formed
during this process was conducted with xanthate 3b and enabled us
to isolate and characterize most of them (Scheme 3).
Despite the large excess of brominating agent, aromatic rings
did not suffer from ring halogenation even with an electron-donat-
ing group attached to the aromatic moiety. The undesired mole-
cules were presumably formed because of the presence of water
and methanol in the [bdmim][F]. The presence of S-methyl
O-4-biphenyl thiocarbonate 6, isolated with 10% yield can indeed
be explained by hydrolysis side reaction whereas carbonate 7
may result in the nucleophilic attack of methanol. More the
more surprisingly was the isolation of the 4-[difluoro(methy-
loxy)methoxy]biphenyl 5 in which the methylthio was substituted
by a methoxy group once again due to the presence of methanol in
the IL. This observation turned our attention to the possibility of
finding adequate conditions and/or substrates to improve the yield
of the formation of such rare difluorinated ketals.
Encouraged by these results, the scope and limitations of
the reactivity of [bdmim][F] were thus evaluated with a set of
xanthates (Table 2).17
Table 2
Only a few methods leading to the difluoromethylenedioxy
group (OCF2O) have been reported.18 Those types of compounds
have been prepared mainly by reacting various nucleophilic fluor-
ide reagents (e.g., BrF3, HF, AgF, Bu4NH2F3) with either dichlorodi-
oxomethylene derivatives or thiocarbonates. The synthesis of
asymmetrical aryl–alkyl difluoromethylenedioxy compounds
requires quite harsh conditions outlining the urgent need for a
more practical preparation. The O,O-aryl-methylthiocarbonates,
substrates for fluoro-desulfurization process, were prepared by
an adaptation of the described methods without further optimiza-
tion. These thiocarbonates were then engaged in reaction in the
presence of [bdmim][F] (10 equiv) and NBS (12 equiv), following
our previous protocol17 (Scheme 4). Compound 9a was chosen
for the first attempt because the ketal 10a was already described.
To our delight, we were able to isolate the pure molecule 10a albeit
in rather low yields in spite of a total conversion. We assume those
side reactions as partial hydrolysis may occur during the process.
Synthesis of difluoro(methylthio)methyl ethers 4 from xanthate 3
S
NBS (12 eq), [bdmim][F] (10 eq)
CH2Cl2 4 ml, 3h, -30°C -> rt
F
F
R
R
O
S
O
S
4 a-h
3 a-h
Entry
R
Product
Yielda (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(3a) 4-Br–C6H4–
(3b) 4-Ph–C6H4–
(3c) 4-Me–C6H4–
(3d) 4-MeO–C6H4–
(3e) 3-MeO2C–C6H4–
(3f) 4-IsoPr–C6H4–
(3g) Ph–(CH2)3–
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
45 (41)b
52 (43)b
40 (25)b
38 (27)b
43 (30)b
48 (36)b
36
4g
4h
(3h) C16H33
–
29
a
Yield determined 19F NMR with 4-(chloro-difluoro-methoxy)-phenylamine as
internal reference.
b
Isolated yield.
Ph
Ph
F
F
F
F
+
NBS (12 eq),
[bdmim][F] (10 eq)
O
S
Ph
O
O
S
5
12%
4b 43%
CH2Cl2 4 ml,
3h, -20°C to rt
O
S
Ph
Ph
3b
O
O
+
+
O
S
O
O
6
7
11%
10%
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 4-(difluoro(methylthio)methoxy) biphenyl 4b from xanthate 3b.
CSCl2
S
[bdmim][F] (10 eq)
S
NaOH 5%
MeOH
F
F
ROH
RO
OMe
CHCl3,
1h, 0°C
Et3N,
NBS (12 eq)
CH2Cl2, 5h, -30°C -> rt
RO
OMe
RO
Cl
1h, 0°C
(38%))a 24%
10a
8a
8b
9a
9b
68% R= 3-NO2-C6H4-
72% R = 4-MeO-C6H4-
67% yield
71% yield
10b (38%)a 29%
5
10d
(36%))a 24%
- (37%))a 33%
8c 50% R= 4-Ph-C6H4-
8d
8e
9c 30% yield
9d
9e
40% R= 2-Naphyl-CH2-
90% R= 4-Br-C6H4-
32% yield
73% yield
10e - (38%))a 15%
a Yield determined 19F NMR with 4-(chloro-difluoro-methoxy)-phenylamine as internal reference.
Scheme 4. Formation of asymmetric aryl–alkyl difluoromethylenedioxy derivatives.