3582
C. Mara et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 3580–3583
Table 2
phur for nitrogen in the heterocycle improved activity less than
twofold, as seen in a comparison of 12 and 9. However, none of
the compounds tested approached the activity of APM.
The results obtained for compounds 13–18 show the impact on
activity of incorporating the thiophosphoryl group within a ben-
zodioxaphosphinine heterocycle. Although the saligenin derivative
13, with an IC50 of half that of its acyclic analogue8 showed prom-
ise, none of the nitro-substituted saligenin compounds tested
afforded an improvement in activity. For example, compound 16
lacked activity, also seen with its acyclic congener.8
Table 3 depicts the result of varying the aromatic component
within APM-like molecules, including a series of heterocyclic
derivatives. Compounds 19 and 20, containing bulky naphthyl
moieties, showed poor anti-parasitic activity. Within the pyridines
21–27, the most active compounds tested were 23–25, with a CF3
substituent para to the oxygen, and 26. When compared to their
non-pyridine phenol analogues,8 compound 23 was twice as po-
Anti-malarial activity of benzodioxaphosphininamine sulfides 13–18 as assessed by
inhibition of pLDH at 72 ha
No.
Phosporous heterocycle
R0
IC50
(lM)
clogPa
13
i-Pr
62
2.81
14
15
n-Pr
i-Bu
95
58
2.86
3.26
16
17
i-Pr
>128
108
3.23
2.76
i-Pr
tent (25
lM vs 50
lM) while compound 25 was equipotent
(23 M vs 26
l
lM). In addition, the pronounced preference for a
phosphorothioamidate rather than a phosphoroamidate function-
ality as seen in the acyclic compounds8 was not as obvious in the
heterocyclic compounds of Table 3, as illustrated by a comparison
18
i-Bu
118
4
3.22
3.50
APM
of 23 and 24, with IC50s of 25
lines 28 and 29 were quite active, with the more effective being the
6-hydroxy compound 29, with an IC50 of 19 M. 7-Chloro-4-
lM and 29 lM, respectively. Quino-
a
clogP values calculated using MarvinSketch 5.1.4 from ChemAxon.
l
aminoquinolines such as chloroquine are established agents. Many
derivatives including this pharmacophore have been prepared,
including molecules showing dual antimalarial and antitrypanoso-
mal activities,24 or even antitubercular activity.25 We incorporated
this unit as the heterocyclic amine moiety within our organophos-
phorus derivatives, to examine whether this molecular hybridiza-
tion approach would augment activity. The results of this
approach, as demonstrated with compound 30, show a dramatic
improvement in activity. In addition, it is important to know if
compound 30 shows cross resistance with chloroquine. The po-
tency of 30, when tested against the chloroquine-resistant strain
K1/Thailand, was identical to the 3D7 strain, indicating no cross-
resistance with chloroquine in this strain at least (data not shown).
equimolar quantities of phenol (or other aromatic) and amine syn-
thons, as shown in Scheme 3, and the desired compounds were ob-
tained in 35–75% yields.
Tables 1–3 show the anti-malarial activity of the APM ana-
logues, both cyclic and acyclic. In our experiments, APM had an
IC50 value of 4 lM. Firstly, for the phenoxyoxazaphospholidines
and phenoxyoxazaphosphinanes 1–12, the most active compound
tested was 6, the 2-CH3-5-NO2 substituted analogue. Among cer-
tain of the nitro-substituted phenoxyoxazaphospholidines and
phenoxyoxazaphosphinanes, the size of the heterocyclic ring did
have some impact on activity, as exemplified by a comparison of
4 and 5, and also 6 and 7. More important was nature of the phe-
nolic substituent, as can be seen by comparing 1, 4 and 6, where
most activity was exhibited by 6, with an IC50 of 24 lM. A 4-CH3
group seemed not to improve activity significantly, as evidenced
by a comparison of 3 and 1, or 11 and 9. Also, substitution of sul-
In addition, the IC50 of amine 31 was 0.64 lM, 17 times less active
than 30, supporting the molecular hybridization approach and the
contribution of the phosphorothioamidate moiety to the activity of
30.
Table 3
Anti-malarial activity of 19–31 as assessed by inhibition of pLDH at 72 h
No.
R
R0
X
IC50
(l
M)
clogPa
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Naphtal-2-ol
i-Propyl
i-Propyl
i-Propyl
i-Propyl
i-Propyl
i-Propyl
Cyclopentyl
i-Propyl
i-Propyl
O
O
O
O
O
S
O
O
O
S
87
98
128
128
25
29
23
25
128
25
3.69
3.64
2.54
2.49
2.95
3.69
3.39
2.49
1.37
3.94
3.94
1-NO2 naphtal-2-ol
2-OH-4-CH3 pyridine
2-OH-4-CH3-3-NO2 pyridine
2-OH-5-CF3 pyridine
2-OH-5-CF3 pyridine
2-OH-5-CF3 pyridine
2-OH-4-CH3-5-NO2 pyridine
4-OH pyridine
8-OH quinoline
6-OH quinoline
Cyclopentyl
Cyclopentyl
S
19
30
4-CF3 phenyl
S
0.038
6.10
31
0.64
4
1.99
3.50
APM
4-CH3-2-NO2
i-Propyl
S
a
clogP values calculated using MarvinSketch 5.1.4 from ChemAxon.