Table 2 Hydroboration of a- and b-methylstyrenea in scCO2
Conversion (selectivity) (%)
3
It is also possible that a Rh–h -benzyl intermediate17 that would
1
lead to A could be stabilized in scCO2 relative to the h -
regioisomer that would yield B.
In summary, we have demonstrated that catalysed alkene
hydroboration can proceed in supercritical CO2 without any
difficulty from B–H reactivity with the solvent. Regiocontrol
can be achieved using tunable ligands of the form R2PRF and
R2PORF. Furthermore, significantly higher regioselectivities
can be obtained for these ligands in scCO2, relative to
fluorocarbons and even THF. Given further advancements in
catalyst separations and recovery in scCO2,18 catalysis in this
medium can complement fluorous phase approaches. We are
currently assessing the effects of pressure (solvent density) on
selectivity, monitoring reactive species by in situ NMR
spectroscopy, and studying stoichiometric reactions of isolable
16 electron rhodium–boryl complexes.19
Entry
L
E+F+G
EA+FA
1
2
3
4
5
6
P[3,5-(CF3)2C6H3]3 (3)
P(RF)3 (4)
Ph2PORF (5)
Cy2PORF (6)
Ph2PRF (7)
100 (0+24+76)
56 (55+45+0)
13 (100+0+0)
3 (50+50+0)
19 (96+4+0)
38 (36+64+0)
90 (78+22)
13 (100+0)
8 (100+0)
71 (89+11)
16 (100+0)
77 (71+29)
Cy2PRF (8)
a Conversion and selectivity were determined after 24 h.
Table 3 Effect of solvent on the regioselectivity of vinylanisole hydro-
borationa
This work was supported as part of the Los Alamos Catalysis
Initiative by the Department of Energy through Laboratory
Directed Research and Development (LDRD) funding and by
the Department of Energy (DE-FG02-98ER45732) for work
performed at UNO. We would like to thank Drs Chris Haar and
Dale Smith (UNO) for providing ligands and Professor John
Gladysz for a generous donation of P(CH2CH2C6F13)3.
Selectivity (%)
Conversion
Entry
1
L
Solvent
(%)
A
B
C
D
P(RF)3 (4)
THF
CF3C6F11
scCO2
82
84
66 15 13
57 16 19
6
8
1
94
82
—
17
2
3
4
5
Ph2PORF (5) THF
CF3C6F11
scCO2
Cy2PORF (6) THF
100
98
52 21 16 11
37 23 23 17
81
88
—
12
—
8
Notes and references
† Triphenylphosphine and catalyst precursor 1 (3+1) or Wilkinson’s
catalyst (ref. 9) lead to high selectivity > 95% to A in THF; however, these
catalysts are not effective for methylstyrenes (ref. 19).
94
20 37 35
CF3C6F11
89
24 26 37 13
b
scCO2
89
93
90
88
90
84
80
89
—
—
4
—
12
12
11
—
4
4
Ph2PRF (7)
Cy2PRF (8)
THF
CF3C6F11
scCO2
THF
CF3C6F11
scCO2
1 B. Cornils and W. A. Herrmann, Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with
Organometallic Compounds, VCH, Weinheim, 1996.
2 D. Koch and W. Leitner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 13398.
3 M. A. Carroll and A. B. Holmes, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1395.
4 D. K. Morita, D. R. Pesiri, S. A. David, W. H. Glaze and W. Tumas,
Chem. Commun., 1998, 1397.
5 P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 475.
6 C. M. Haar, J. Huang and S. P. Nolan, Organometallics, 1998, 17, 5018;
D. C. Smith, Jr., E. D. Stevens and S. P. Nolan, Inorg. Chem., 1999, 38,
5277.
—
—
100
91
32 34 17 17
25 41 17 17
100
100
—
—
—
a Reactions in organic solvents were run in NMR tubes using 0.002 mmol
1, 0.004 mmol ligand, and 0.1 mmol vinylanisole. Conversion and
selectivity were determined by 1H NMR. b Some polymeric material was
observed in this reaction.
7 P. Bhattacharyya, D. Gudmunsen, E. G. Hope, R. D. W. Kemmitt, D. R.
Paige and A. M. Stuart, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.1, 1997, 3609.
8 S. A. Westcott, H. P. Blom, T. B. Marder and R. T. Baker, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1992, 114, 8863.
9 I. Beletskaya and A. Pelter, Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 4957.
10 S. Buelow, P. Dell’Orco, D. K. Morita, D. R. Pesiri, E. Birnbaum, S. L.
Borkowsky, G. H. Brown, S. Feng, L. Luan, D. Morgenstern and W.
Tumas, in Frontiers in Benign Chemical Synthesis and Processing, ed.
P. Anastas and T. C. Williamson, Oxford University Press, 1998,
p. 264.
11 J. M. Brown and G. C. Lloyd-Jones, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1992, 710.
12 T. M. Cameron, R. T. Baker and S. A. Westcott, Chem. Commun., 1998,
2395.
13 J. J. J. Juliette, D. Rutherford, I. T. Horváth and J. A. Gladysz, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 2696.
14 G. Francio and W. Leitner, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1663.
15 M. J. Burk, S. Feng, M. F. Gross and W. Tumas, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1995, 117, 8277.
16 R. S. Oakes, T. J. Heppenstall, N. Shezad, A. A. Clifford and C. M.
Rayner, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1459; R. S. Oakes, A. A. Clifford, K. D.
Bartle, M. T. Pett and C. M. Rayner, Chem. Commun., 1999, 247.
17 T. Hayashi, Y. Matsumoto and Y. Ito, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1991,
2, 601.
18 S. Kainz, A. Brinkmann, W. Leitner and A. Pfaltz, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1999, 121, 6421.
19 K. Burgess, W. A. van der Donk, S. A. Westcott, T. B. Marder, R. T.
Baker and J. C. Calabrese, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 9350.
Horvath13 reported an elegant study of alkene hydroboration in
fluorous biphasic media using RhCl[P(RF)3]3 derived from 4;
however, the regioselectivity for styrene derivatives was low.
Comparing the reaction of vinylanisole and HBcat in scCO2 to
that in perfluoromethylcyclohexane led to some surprising
results. Catalyst precursor 1 and ligand 4 showed significantly
greater regiocontrol in scCO2 (Table 3, entry 1). This trend held
for ligands 5–8 and was particularly striking for Cy2PRF (entry
5) which afforded a single product in scCO2. Remarkably, the
selectivity in scCO2 for 4–8 was also considerably higher than
that observed in THF. Ligand 4 is not soluble in THF; however,
partially fluorinated ligands 5–8 and their rhodium complexes
are fully soluble under the reaction conditions. In THF, product
selectivity using the nonfluorinated analog of ligand 8 (i.e.
Cy2PC8H17) was found to be similar to that observed for ligand
8, confirming the insulating effect of the two methylene spacers
in the RF group.† There are several reports4,5,14,15 of enhanced
selectivity of catalysed reactions in scCO2 compared to
conventional organic solvents. Except for a few cases where
density is controlled through pressure changes,16 we are
unaware of any examples presenting such a dramatic effect as
that shown here. The origin of the higher selectivities for
hydroborations is not clear. Since ligand-free rhodium com-
plexes result in poor hydroboration selectivity,11 stability and
lability of the catalysts (i.e. keeping the ligand on the metal),
which are likely solvent dependent, may play an important role.
Communication a909636a
348
Chem. Commun., 2000, 347–348