readily available N-tosylhydrazones, which were derived
from the corresponding aldehydes or ketones, as the
precursors of in situ-generated nonstabilized diazo com-
pounds in the formation of CÀC,8 CÀO,9 CÀP,10 CÀS,11
CÀB,12 and CÀN13 bonds through both metal-catalyzed
and metal-free processes.14 Migratory insertion involving
a palladium carbene was proposed to constitute the key
step in these processes.15 Although impressive progress
has been achieved, however, to the best of our knowledge,
CÀN bond formation using N-tosylhydrazone as a carbo-
nyl surrogate has been rarely reported.13 Based on that, we
report herein a novel approach to N-vinylindoles via Pd-
catalyzed oxidative cross-coupling of N-tosylhydrazones
with indoles.
The condensation of indole 1a with N-tosylhydrazone
2a was initially chosen as a model reaction to screen the
reaction parameters. The desired product 3a was obtained
in 56% yield using 10 mol % Pd(OAc)2/PPh3 as a catalyst,
3.0 equiv of LiOtBu as a base, in toluene at 110 °C (Table 1,
entry 1). Inspired by the preliminary results, the solvents
were examined first (entries 1À4). N,N-Dimethyl forma-
mide (DMF) gave unparalleled performance in this reac-
tion, providing the desired product in 82% yield (entry 3).
When the loading of catalyst was reduced to 5 mol %, the
product 3a was afforded in 80% yield (entry 5). While,
complete inactivity of this reaction system was observed in
the absence of the palladium acetate (entry 6). The base
and the reaction temperature are critical for this transfor-
mation. Of the temperature tested, 80 °C appeared to be
the most favorable (entry 5 vs 7). Whereas, the yield was
decreased to 75% by continuous lowering of the tempera-
ture to 60 °C (entry 7 vs 8). Further fine-tuning of the
reaction conditions has revealed that LiOtBu was superior
to other inorganic bases, such as K2CO3, NaOAc, and
KOtBu (entries 7, 10À13). The yield was not improved
significantly by using Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 as a catalyst instead
of Pd(OAc)2 in the presence of 10 mol % PPh3 (entry 13 vs
14). However, the yield of 3a could reach 94% without
adding PPh3 (entry 15). Interestingly, the reaction pro-
ceeded to completion within 36 h when 2.5 mol % of
Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 was loaded and gave a 92% isolated yield
(entry 17). The controlled experiments were carried out
under air or N2, which led to lower yields of 3a (entries 19,
20). After additional evaluations of palladium catalysts,
bases, temperatures, and catalyst loadings, a combination
of 1a:2a = 1:1.5, 5 mol % Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, and 2.0 equiv of
LiOtBu in DMF at 80 °C were found to be optimal, and 3a
was isolated in 99% yield within 4 h (entry 16).
With the optimized reaction conditions established
(Table 1, entry 16), the scope of the substrates for this reac-
tion was investigated. As shown in Scheme 1, this catalytic
system exhibited highly catalytic activity for a large range
of N-tosylhydrazones and indoles and afforded the main
products 3 in up to 99% yields for 26 examples. A wide
variety of functional groups including nitro, halogens,
ether, aryl, and trifloromethyl groups were tolerated under
the optimal reaction conditions. N-Tosylhydrazones with
both electron-donating and -withdrawing substituents
were compatible with this reaction system, providing
the corresponding coupling products in good to excellent
yields (87À99%, Scheme 1, 3aÀg). This reaction was not
affected significantly by the steric hindrance in N-tosylhy-
drazones. The variation of substituents at the ortho, meta,
and para position in N-tosylhydrazones could afford the
desired products in 92À96% yields (3b, 3h, 3i). Tosylhy-
drazones derived from 1-(naphthalen-2-yl) ethanone and
dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one were also good partners for
this transformation. The desired products 3k and 3l were
obtained in 92% and 91% yields, respectively.
ꢀ
(6) Barluenga, J.; Moriel, P.; Valdes, C.; Aznar, F. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5587.
(7) (a) Adlingto, R. M.; Barrett, A. G. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1983, 16,
55. (b) Bamford, W. R.; Stevens, T. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 4735.
(c) Fulton, J. R.; Aggarwal, V. K.; Vicente, J. de. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 8, 1479.
(8) For seleted examples, see: (a) Barluenga, J.; Escribano, M.;
ꢀ
Aznar, F.; Valdes, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6856.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(b) Barluenga, J.; Tomas-Gamasa, M.; Aznar, F.; Valdes, C. Nat. Chem.
2009, 1, 494. (c) Zhou, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 922.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(d) Perez-Aguilar, M. C.; Valdes, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51,
5953. (e) Ye, F.; Ma, X.; Xiao, Q.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 5742. (f) Zhao, X.; Wu, G. J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3296. (g) Barluenga, J.; Tomas-Gamasa,
M.; Moriel, P.; Aznar, F.; Valdes, C. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4792.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(h) Brachet, E.; Hamze, A.; Peyrat, J.-F.; Brion, J.-D.; Alami., M. Org.
Lett. 2010, 12, 4042. (i) Yu, W.-Y.; Tsoi, Y.-T.; Zhou, Z.; Chan, A. S. C.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 469. (j) Xiao, Q.; Ma, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang,
J. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4732. (k) Inamoto, K.; Saito, T.; Katsuno, M.;
Sakamoto, T.; Hiroya, K. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2931.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(9) (a) Barluenga, J.; Tomas-Gamasa, M.; Aznar, F.; Valdes, C.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4993. (b) Aggarwal, V. K.; Patel, M.;
Studley, J. Chem. Commun. 2002, 14, 1514. (c) Aggarwal, V. K.; Alonso,
E.; Hynd, G.; Lydon, K. M.; Palmer, M. J.; Porcelloni, M.; Studley, J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1430. (d) Zhou, A.; Wu, L.; Li, D.;
Chen, Q.; Zhang, X.; Xia, W. Chin. J. Chem. 2012, 30, 1862.
(10) (a) Wu, L.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Q. Q.; Zhou, A. K. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2012, 10, 7859. (b) Miao, W.; Gao, Y.; Li, X.; Gao, Y.; Tang, G.;
Zhao, Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 2659. (c) Chen, Z.-S.; Zhou,
Z.-Z.; Hua, H.-L.; Duan, X.-H.; Luo, J.-Y.; Wang, J.; Zhou, P.-X.;
Liang, Y.-M. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 1065.
(11) (a) Ding, Q.; Cao, B.; Yuan, J.; Liu, X.; Peng, Y. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2011, 9, 748. (b) Li, Y.; Huang, Z.; Wu, X.; Xu, P.-F.; Jin, J.;
Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 5234. (c) Barluenga, J.;
ꢀ
ꢀ
Tomas-Gamasa, M.; Aznar, F.; Valdes, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 8,
1520. (d) Feng, X. W.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, N.; Yu,
X. Q. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4408.
(12) Li, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 2943.
(13) (a) Hamze, A.; Treguier, B.; Brion, J. D.; Alami, M. Org. Biomol.
Additionally, nonterminal olefins 3m, 3n, and 3r could
be obtained in 99%, 94%, and 83% yields, respectively.
Normally, the substrates with a halogen easily undergo the
arlyation reaction with N-tosylhydrazones to afford biaryl
derivatives.6,8gÀj To our delight, the presence of halides on
the aromatic ring of N-tosylhydrazones did not interfere with
the formation of the desired products (3bÀd, 3hÀi, 3o),
which provided opportunities for further synthetic elabora-
tion. The substrate scope could be extended to N-tosylhy-
drazone derived from 1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl) ethanone to
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
Chem. 2011, 9, 6200. (b) Barluenga, J.; Tomas-Gamasa, M.; Valdes, C.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5950.
(14) For recent reviews on the use of N-tosylhydrazones, see:
(a) Shao, Z. H.; Zhang, H. B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 560. (b) Xiao,
Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 236. (c) Zhang, Y.;
ꢀ
Wang, J. Top. Curr. Chem. 2012, 327, 239. (d) Barluenga, J.; Valdes, C.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7486.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(15) (a) Albeniz, A. C.; Espinet, P.; Manrique, R.; Perez-Mateo, A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2363. (b) Albeniz, A. C.; Espinet, P.;
Manrique, R.; Perez-Mateo, A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2005, 11, 1565.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(c) Albeniz, A. C.; Espinet, P.; Perez-Mateo, A.; Nova, A.; Ujaque, G.
Organometallics 2006, 25, 1293.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX