R. Ziessel et al.
The rate of energy transfer was calculated from the quan-
tum yield, according to Equation (1),[36] to be ken(f) =8.2ꢀ
108 sÀ1 for dye 10, by considering the quantum yield and life-
time of model compound 7 and by taking into account the
amount of light that was used for the direct excitation of
fragment C. The rate that was calculated from the residual
lifetime of fragment A in triad 10 by using Equation (2),[36]
Experimental Section
Synthesis of compound 9: In
a Schlenk tube, compound 8 (30 mg,
0.035 mmol) and compound B (32 mg, 0.042 mmol) were dissolved in a
mixture of benzene (5 mL) and triethylamine (3 mL). Argon gas was
bubbled through the mixture for 30 min; then, [PdACTHNUTRGNE(UNG PPh3)4] (4 mg,
10 mol%) was added and the mixture was stirred at 708C for 12 h. The
solvents were evaporated and the residue was extracted with CH2Cl2 and
washed with water. The organic layer was filtered over hygroscopic
cotton wool and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude residue
was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (toluene/CH2Cl2,
8:2 to 0:1) and recrystallization from CH2Cl2/EtOAc gave compound 9 as
k
en(t) =7.4ꢀ108 sÀ1, was in excellent agreement with the rate
that was previously calculated from the quantum yields. A
similar energy-transfer rate, ken(t) =8.5 108 sÀ1, was calculated
for triad 9 by using the excited-state lifetimes. The large un-
certainty in the determination of weak quantum yields ex-
cludes the calculation of the energy-transfer rate from these
1
a deep-green solid (46 mg, 88%). H NMR (CD2Cl2, 400 MHz): d=1.0 (t,
3J=7.4 Hz, 3H), 1.33 (s, 6H), 1.43–1.47 (m, 15H), 1.55 (m, 5H), 1.72–
1.75 (m, 4H), 1.85–1.92 (m, 2H), 2.56 (s, 3H), 2.73 (s, 6H), 3.19 (t, 3J=
5.7 Hz, 2H), 3.26 (t, 3J=6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.33 (s, 6H), 3.49–3.52 (m, 4H),
3.59–3.61 (m, 4H), 3.84 (t, 3J=6.7 Hz, 2H), 3.15 (s, 4H), 6.00 (s, 1H),
6.10 (s, 2H), 6.64 (s, 1H), 7.37–7.51 (m, 8H), 7.68–7.73 (m, 8H), 8.04–
8.06 ppm (m, 4H); 13C NMR (CD2Cl2, 50 MHz): d=14.4, 14.6, 14.9, 15.2,
16.3, 19.9, 30.2, 30.9, 32.5, 32.7, 32.9, 36.7, 40.3, 47.2, 47.8, 69.3, 72.2, 76.3,
90.3, 91.8, 113.0, 113.1, 113.2, 117.4, 118.4, 120.5, 120.5, 120.6, 122.1,
122.5, 123.6, 123.9, 123.9, 123.9, 125.6, 125.7, 126.8, 127.3, 129.1, 129.4,
129.6, 132.7, 132.8, 132.9, 134.2, 134.2, 135.5, 136.1, 136.3, 137.6, 140.2,
141.4, 141.8, 143.4, 145.2, 152.0, 152.4, 155.9, 156.5, 158.0, 168.76 ppm;
À
values. Note that, for dye 10, excitation into the thiazolo
thiazole fragment at 379 nm did not show any residual emis-
sion of fragment A. This result implies that direct energy
À
transfer from the thiazolo thiazole to fragment C is effec-
tive and is facilitated by a favourable spectroscopic overlap
À
between the emission of the thiazolo thiazole group at 500–
590 nm and the absorption of styryl dye C in dyad 10 (labs
=
11B NMR (C6D6, 400 MHz): d=1.96 ppm (t, J
ACTHNUTRGNEUNG(B,F)=34.2 Hz); FTIR-
550–650 nm). On irradiation at 379 nm, 3.5% of the light is
ATR : n˜ =2921 (m), 2850 (m), 1580 (s), 1539 (s), 1496 (s), 1291 (s), 1153
(s), 1075 (s), 980 (s), 833 cmÀ1 (s); MS (EI): m/z (%) calcd for [M]:
1485.6; found: 1485.5 (100), 1466.5 (10) [MÀF]; elemental analysis calcd
(%) for C91H91B2F2N7O5S2 (1487.5): C 73.48, H 6.23, N 6.59; found:
C 73.22, H 5.93, N 6.44.
absorbed by group A, 25.9% by group C, and 70.6% by the
À
thioazolo thiazole bridge. No multi-cascade ET from the
À
thiazolo thiazole group to module A and from module A to
module C occurs in this case. Finally, the energy-transfer ef-
ficiency, as well as the rate of energy transfer, were calculat-
Synthesis of compound 10: Compound 10 was prepared according the
same procedure as compound 9 from compound 8 (25 mg, 0.029 mmol),
compound C (23 mg, 0.035 mmol), [PdACHTUNTRGNEUNG(PPh3)4] (3 mg, 10 mmol%), ben-
ed by using PhotochemCAD software[37] with a boron
À
boron distance of 34.5 ꢅ for dye 10, 36.0 ꢅ for dye 9, and
an orientation factor (k2) of 0.5, which is consistent with the
Fçrster energy-transfer theory (kcalcd =9.0ꢀ108 sÀ1 for com-
pound 10 and kcalcd =2.0ꢀ109 sÀ1 for compound 9).[38] Under
these conditions, the Fçrster radius is 43.6 ꢅ for dye 10 and
44.4 ꢅ for dye 9. These calculated rates are in excellent
agreement with the rates that were determined from the re-
sidual quantum yield and excited-state lifetime of donor A
in triads 9 and 10 (see above).
zene (5 mL), and triethylamine (3 mL). The crude residue that was ob-
tained after evaporation of the solvent was recrystallized several times
from THF/EtOH/pentane to give compound 10 as a deep-green solid
(40 mg, 92%). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 400 MHz): d=1.47 (s, 6H), 1.54 (s,
6H), 2.39 (s, 6H), 2.73 (s, 6H), 3.33 (s, 6H), 3.50–3.52 (m, 4H), 3.59–3.61
(m, 4H), 4.15 (s, 4H), 6.09 (s, 2H), 6.69 (s, 2H), 7.23–7.31 (m, 6H), 7.36–
7.42 (m, 4H), 7.55 (d, 3J=7.9 Hz, 4H), 7.64–7.74 (m, 10H), 8.03–
8.05 ppm (m, 4H); 13C NMR (CD2Cl2, 100 MHz): d=14.6, 14.7, 14.9,
21.2, 58.6, 59.3, 68.8, 71.7, 89.9, 90.0, 91.2, 91.4, 117.8, 117.9, 121.7, 123.6,
123.7, 125.2, 125.2, 126.3, 127.4, 128.7, 128.9, 129.2, 129.6, 132.3, 132.4,
133.1, 133.8, 135.7, 136.5, 137.9, 139.6, 141.0, 141.4, 142.2, 151.1, 152.7,
155.5, 168.3, 168.3 ppm; 11B NMR (C6D6, 400 MHz): d=2.12 ppm (t, J-
In short, we have successfully constructed a new class of
À
highly fluorescent dyes based on a central thiazolo thiazole
AHCTUNGERTG(NNUN B,F)=33.9 Hz); FTIR-ATR: n˜ =2962 (m), 1603 (m), 1540 (s), 1512 (s),
À
rigid core. These new thiazolo thiazole dyes do not aggre-
1487 (s), 1406 (s), 1367 (s), 1308 (s), 1260 (s), 1151 (s), 1075 (s), 981 (s),
800 cmÀ1 (s); MS (EI): m/z (%) calcd for [M]: 1378.5; found: 1378.4
(100), 1359.4 (20) [MÀF]; elemental analysis calcd (%) for
C86H74B2F2N6O4S2 (1380.3): C 74.83, H 5.48, N 6.09; found: C 74.69,
H 5.18, N 5.72.
gate in apolar or polar solvents and their fluorescence is
fairly insensitive towards solvent polarity, with the best
quantum yields reaching 60%. The post-functionalization of
À
such dyes allows the preparation of donor acceptor systems
CCDC-884442 (1) and CCDC-884443 (7) contain the supplementary crys-
tallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of
charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via
À
in a controlled manner, for which the thiazolo thiazole core
can be used as fluorescent bridge and as an input energy
centre to promote cascade electronic energy transfer to a
bodipy energy acceptor. No residual emission of the thia-
À
ACHTUNGTRENNUNGzolo thiazole rings was observed, whereas 10% residual
emission of the tetramethyl-substituted bodipy group was
found in triad 10, thus enabling the calculation of a rate of
electronic energy transfer of about 8ꢀ108 sÀ1. This rate is in
keeping with the calculated rate for Fçrster energy transfer
by using PhotochemCAD. Further work on structural modi-
fication and deeper investigation of the nature of the emis-
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the CNRS for their provision of research facilities and
financial support and the IMRA Europe S.A.S. (Sophia Antipolis) for a
PhD fellowship (to A.N.). We also thank Prof. Jack Harrowfield (ISIS,
Strasbourg) for critical reading of this manuscript before publication.
À
sion state in the thiazolo thiazole dyes are currently under-
way.
Keywords: aldehydes · bodipy · dyes/pigments · energy
transfer · fluorescence
&
6
&
ꢄ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 0000, 00, 0 – 0
ÝÝ
These are not the final page numbers!