530
Y.-Q. Xu et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 24 (2013) 527–530
22%–27% ee, Table 1, entries 1 and 2). Improved enantioselectivity
was obtained when IrCl(CO)(PPh3)2 or IrCl(COD)PPh3 was used
(54%–60% ee, Table 1, entries 3 and 4). The catalytic system
generated in situ from (R,R)-5 and IrH(CO)(PPh3)3 gave the best
enantioselectivity (80% ee, Table 1, entry 5). Under the same
conditions, C2-symmetric multidentate aminophosphine ligands
(R,R)-3 and (R,R)-4 exhibited low activities, producing (R)-1-
phenylpropan-1-ol with only 12%–14% yield and 63%–64% ee
(Table 1, entries 6 and 7). These results indicated that the structure
of amine groups –NH2 in the ligand 5 is responsible for the good
activity as well as enantioselectivity and the –NH2 linkage can
possibly stabilize a catalytic transition state [5].
With the optimized conditions in hand, we examined the
asymmetric reduction of a wide range of aromatic ketones using
the catalytic system of IrH(CO)(PPh3)3 in combination with (R,R)-5.
For acetophenone and its derivatives, the catalyst system showed
decreased enantioselectivities (17%–66% ee; Table 1, entries 8–13).
In the case of more hindered aromatic ketones, such as
isobutyrophenone and cyclohexyl phenyl ketone, equally good
enantioselectivities were observed with certain decrease in
activity (Table 1, entries 14 and 15). These may imply that the
interaction between substrate and chiral ligands plays an
important role in asymmetric catalysis.
[8] V.A. Pavlov, C2 and C1 symmetry of chiral auxiliaries in catalytic reactions on
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have developed
a series of novel
C2-symmetric chiral multidentate aminophosphine ligands from
commercially available (1R,2R)-diaminocyclohexane through a
convenient transformation. These ligands have been successfully
employed in the Ir-catalyzed asymmetric reduction of various
aromatic ketones to obtain corresponding optically active alcohols
with up to 98% conversion and 80% ee. The results demonstrated
that the ligand with primary amine tended to give higher
enantioselectivity. Furthermore, in comparison with the chiral
N,P-ligands traditionally used in the catalytic enantioselective
transfer hydrogenation, these multidentate aminophosphine
ligands have more coordination sites, which maybe result in
unique features in asymmetric reaction. Further investigation of
these chiral aminophosphine ligands is in progress.
20
[15] Compound 2: ½aꢂD +32.8 (c 0.4, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 4.65 (d, 1H,
J = 8.0 Hz, NH carbamate), 3.28–3.05 (m, 1H, CHN), 2.36 (dt, 1H, J = 10.0 Hz and
3.5 Hz, CHN), 2.05–1.95 (m, 2H, CH2, cycl), 1.78–1.65 (m, 4H, CH2, cycl and NH2),
1.45 (s, 9H, tBoc), 1.38–1.05 (m, 4H, 2CH2, cycl). Compound 3: mp 114–116 8C;
20
½aꢂD +53.5 (c 0.2, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.79 (s, 1H), 8.76 (s, 1H),
8.02 (s, 1H), 7.94 (s, 1H), 7.68–7.56 (m, 1H), 7.40–7.18 (m, 10H), 6.90–6.77 (m,
2H), 3.58–3.42 (m, 2H), 2.94–2.77 (m, 2H), 2.23–2.08 (m, 2H), 2.08–1.95 (m, 2H),
1.75–1.62 (m, 4H), 1.50–1.42 (m, 4H), 1.34 (s, 18H), 1.25–1.16 (m, 4H); 13C NMR
(125 MHz, CDCl3): d 159.0, 158.8, 155.3, 139.8 (d, J = 18.8 Hz), 139.3 (d,
J = 17.5 Hz), 136.4 (d, J = 16.3 Hz), 136.2, 134.4, 134.2, 133.7, 133.4, 130.3,
130.2, 129.1, 128.9, 128.7, 128.6, 128.2, 78.8, 73.9, 54.3, 33.2, 33.0, 31.8, 28.4,
24.9, 24.8, 24.0 (d); 31P NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): d ꢁ20.55; HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd.
for C42H56N4O4P [M+H]+: 711.4034, found: 711.4034. Compound 4: mp 134–
20
136 8C; ½aꢂD ꢁ7.0 (c 0.2, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.62–7.45 (m, 2H),
7.43–7.30 (m, 5H), 7.29–7.20 (m, 2H), 7.20–7.18 (m, 2H), 6.87–6.72 (m, 2H), 5.05–
4.42 (br m, 2H), 4.08–3.82 (m, 4H), 3.35–3.11 (m, 2H), 2.26–2.14 (m, 2 H), 2.10–
2.00 (m, 2H), 1.98–1.85 (m, 4H), 1.69–1.56 (m, 4H), 1.44 (s, 18 H), 1.30–1.21 (m, 2
H), 1.13–0.98 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d 156.1, 145.0, 135.0, 134.3,
134.1, 133.6, 133.4, 129.1, 129.0, 128.9, 128.7, 128.6, 127.2, 60.6, 60.4, 54.6, 49.3,
49.2, 49.1, 49.0, 32.7, 32.6, 31.6, 28.4, 24.7, 24.5; 31P NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3): d
ꢁ25.35; HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd. for C42H60N4O4P [M+H]+: 715.4347, found:
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (No. 21173176), Program for Changjiang Scholars and
Innovative Research Team in University (No. IRT1036) and State Key
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces for financial
support.
20
715.4345. Compound 5: mp 60–62 8C; ½aꢂD ꢁ37.0 (c 0.2, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.58–7.36 (m, 3H), 7.35–7.28 (m, 4H), 7.26–7.13 (m, 4H),
6.92–6.75 (m, 2H), 4.12–3.73 (m, 4H), 3.25 (br s, 6H), 2.46–2.28 (m, 2H), 2.28–2.00
(m, 4H), 1.98–1.84 (m, 2H), 1.75–1.60 (m, 4H), 1.28–1.12 (m, 6H), 1.03–0.82 (m,
2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d 144.5 (d, J = 32 Hz), 144.2 (d, J = 31 Hz), 136.4
(d, J = 7 Hz), 135.6 (d, J = 12 Hz), 135.4 (d, J = 11 Hz), 134.4, 134.2, 134.0, 133.8,
129.8 (d, J = 5 Hz), 129.3, 128.9, 128.7 (d, J = 7 Hz), 127.7 (d, J = 12 Hz), 61.9 (d,
J = 17 Hz), 55.1 (d, J = 17 Hz), 50.0, 49.8, 49.4, 49.3, 33.8, 33.4, 31.2, 31.1, 25.1 (d),
24.8 (d). 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3): d ꢁ 24.80; HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd. for
C32H44N4P [M+H]+: 515.3298, found: 515.3303.
References