Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Paper
Synthesis of 1,4,7,10-tetrakis(4-bromobenzyl)-1,4,7,10-tetra-
azacyclododecane (5)
CD3OD = 0.75/0.005, v/v) 7.99 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 8H), 6.52 (d, J =
7.9 Hz, 8H), 4.03 (s, 12H), 3.16 (broad-s, 16H), 2.45 (broad-s,
8H). 13C NMR (CDCl3–CD3OD = 0.75/0.005, v/v) 166.2, 143.4,
130.8, 130.6, 129.7, 58.9, 52.6, 50.1. The 13C signals of the
CF3SO3 anion were not observed under the condition.
After a mixture of cyclen (1) (0.346 g, 2.01 mmol) and 4-bromo-
benzaldehyde (4) (3.32 g, 17.9 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane
(28 mL) was stirred for 2 hours at rt under a nitrogen atmos-
phere, NaBH(OAc)3 (2.92 g, 13.8 mmol) was added and stirred
for 1 day under a nitrogen atmosphere. Saturated aqueous
NaHCO3 was added to the reaction mixture and then the
residue was extracted with CHCl3 (100 mL × 3). The organic
layer was separated and combined. The organic layer was
washed with water, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated
in vacuo. The residue was recrystallized from acetonitrile
(5 mL) to give 5 as white crystals.
1H NMR titration experiments
1H NMR titration experiments were carried out at 298 K by the
addition of 0.2–2.0 (or 0.5–2.0) equivalents of metal salts
(LiNO3, NaNO3, Mg(NO3)2, Ca(NO3)2, Sr(NO3)2, Co(NO3)2,
Ni(NO3)2, AgNO3, AgCF3SO3, AgPF6, and Zn(NO3)2: 0.001 mmol
μL−1) in D2O (CDCl3–CD3OD for 3) to Cs4L (0.01 mmol/
0.65 mL in D2O, CDCl3–CD3OD for 3).
Yield 1.38 g (81%). Mp. 184.8–186.0 °C. FAB-MS (matrix m-
NBA, m/z) 845 ([M − 3]+, 4%), 847 ([M − 1]+, 12%), 849 ([M + 1]+,
19%), 851 ([M + 3]+, 13%), 853 ([M + 5]+, 4%). 1H NMR
(CDCl3) 7.37 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 8H), 7.16 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 8H), 3.33 (s,
8H), 2.61 (s, 16H). 13C NMR (CDCl3) 139.2, 131.4, 130.9, 120.8,
59.8, 53.4. Anal. Calcd for C36H40Br4N4: C, 50.97; H, 4.75;
N, 6.60. Found: C, 50.88; H, 4.75; N, 6.35.
X-ray structure determination
Crystals of the Cs4L, 3, 3–AgCF3SO3 complex, and 5 were
mounted on top of a glass fiber, and data collection was per-
formed at 100–173 K. Data were corrected for Lorentz and
polarization effects, and absorption corrections were
applied.14 Structures were solved by a direct method and sub-
sequent difference-Fourier syntheses.15 All non-hydrogen
atoms were refined anisotropically and hydrogen atoms were
placed at calculated positions and then refined using Uiso(H) =
1.2Ueq(C). The crystallographic refinement parameters of the
complexes are summarized in Tables S1 and S4–S6 in the ESI.†
Synthesis of tetracesium 4,4′,4′′,4′′′-((1,4,7,10-
tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetrayl)tetrakis(methylene))-
tetrabenzoate (Cs4L)
n-Butyl lithium (1.6 mol L−1 in hexane, 3.0 mL) was added to 5
(0.846 g, 0.997 mmol) in absolute THF (60 mL) at −78 °C
under an argon atmosphere. After dry ice (>44 mg) was added
to the reaction mixture, the flask was stirred for 1 h at rt.
Water (10 mL) and aqueous HCl (2 mol L−1, 10 mL) were
added to the reaction mixture, and then the residual precipi-
tate was washed with CHCl3 (15 mL) and water (15 mL) to give
H4L·4HCl as white powders. After H4L·4HCl was dried
in vacuo, the powders were dissolved in a mixture of DMSO
(15 mL) and methanol (150 mL). To the solution was added
dropwise a saturated aqueous CsOH solution until the pH
reaches 8 to give Cs4L as white powders.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Grants-in-Aid (08026969 and
11011761), a High-Tech Research Center project (2005–2009),
and the Supported Program for Strategic Research Foundation
at Private Universities (2012–2016) from the Ministry of Edu-
cation, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and
the Futaba Memorial Foundation, for Y.H.
Yield 0.899 g (62%).
Notes and references
Synthesis of cesium 4-methylbenzoate
A saturated aqueous CsOH solution was added dropwise to
4-methylbenzoic acid (0.96 g, 5.07 mmol) in methanol (70 mL)
until the pH reaches 8. The residual precipitate was washed
with methanol.
Yield 70%. H NMR (D2O) 7.76 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (d,
J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 2.36 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd for C8H7O2Cs + 1.5H2O:
1 (a) G. W. Gokel, Chem. Commun., 2003, 2847; (b) G. W. Gokel,
L. J. Barbour, W. S. L. De and E. S. Meadows, Coord. Chem.
Rev., 2001, 222, 127; (c) G. W. Gokel, W. S. L. De and
E. S. Meadows, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2000, 2967.
2 A. J. Petrella and C. L. Raston, J. Organomet. Chem., 2004,
689, 4125.
1
C, 34.13; H, 3.04. Found: C, 34.29; H, 3.24.
3 Z. Xu, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2006, 250, 2745.
4 S. D. Zaric, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2003, 2197.
5 M. Munakata, L. P. Wu and G. L. Ning, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2000, 198, 171.
6 J.-P. Morel and N. Morel-Desrosiers, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
2006, 4, 462.
7 (a) Y. Habata, M. Ikeda, S. Yamada, H. Takahashi, S. Ueno,
T. Suzuki and S. Kuwahara, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 4576;
(b) Y. Habata, A. Taniguchi, M. Ikeda, T. Hiraoka,
N. Matsuyama, S. Otsuka and S. Kuwahara, Inorg. Chem.,
Preparation of the 3–AgCF3SO3 complex
Compound 3 (9.20 mg, 0.025 mmol) in chloroform (1 mL) was
added to AgCF3SO3 (15.0 mg, 0.025 mmol) in methanol
(1 mL). Acetonitrile and 1,2-dichloroethane (0.5 mL) were
added to the mixture. Crystals were obtained quantitatively on
evaporation of the solvent.
Anal. Calcd for C45H52N4AgF3O11S: C, 52.89; H, 5.13;
N, 5.48. Found: C, 53.22; H, 5.24; N, 5.33. 1H NMR (CDCl3–
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 4265–4270 | 4269