G.-F. Hou et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 402 (2013) 128–132
129
Table 1
Crystal data and structure refinements for complexes 1 and 2.
1
2
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Crystal system
Space group
a (Å)
C
60H58CoN14O8
C28H24CoN4O5
555.44
tetragonal
I41/a
19.904(3)
19.904(3)
26.180(5)
90
1162.13
monoclinic
P2/c
15.600(3)
9.654(2)
20.651(8)
90
b (Å)
c (Å)
a
(°)
b (°)
112.25(2)
90
2878.5(14)
2
1.341
0.366
90
90
10372(3)
16
1.423
c
(°)
V (Å3)
Z
Dcalc (mg mꢁ3
)
Scheme 1. Structures of bimb and H2dpc.
l
(mmꢁ1
)
0.708
F(0 0 0)
1214
4591
Collected/unique
Rint
26420/6494
0.0315
1.030
0.0443; 0.1360
0.0650; 0.1505
46385/5926
0.0827
1.043
0.0495; 0.1044
0.0850; 0.1167
2. Experimental
Goodness-of-fit GOF on F2
Rla[I > 2
r
(I)]; wR2b[I >
r(I)]
2.1. Materials and measurements
b
Rla (all); wR2 (all)
P
P
a
Cobalt nitrate, ethanol, imidazole, 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid
are from Kermel and 4,40-bis(chloromethyl)-1,10-biphenyl from J &
K Chemicals. All chemicals purchased are of reagent grade and
were used as received without further purification. Elemental anal-
yses for C, H, and N were carried out on a Vario EL III elemental
analyzer. IR spectrum was recorded on a Bruker tensor 27 FT-IR
spectrophotometer in the 4000–400 cmꢁ1 region by using KBr pel-
lets. The luminescent spectrum was taken on a Perkin Elemer Cor-
poration Model Fluorescence Spectrometer LS 55 PL. PL spectra
were performed in solid samples after the crystals were crushed
and put between quartz plates. Thermogravimetric analyses were
carried out with a Perkin-Elmer DTAꢁ1700 with a heating rate of
10 °C/min under atmosphere from 25 to 800 °C. X-ray powder dif-
fraction measurement, whose range of 2h is from 5° to 50°, was
R1
=
||Fo| ꢁ |Fc||/ |Fo|.
P
P
wR2 = { [w(Fo ꢁ Fc2)2/ w(Fo2)2]}1/2
.
b
2
2.3. X-ray crystallography
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data for 1 and 2 were collected
on a Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID imaging plate diffractometer with
graphite-monochromated Mo Ka (k = 0.71073 Å) at 291 K. Empiri-
cal absorption corrections based on equivalent reflections were ap-
plied. The structures of 1 and 2 were solved by direct methods and
refined by full-matrix least-squares methods on F2 using SHELXS-97
crystallographic software package [42]. All non-hydrogen atoms
were refined anisotropically. The hydrogen atoms of the bimb
and bdc molecules were placed in calculated positions and treated
as riding on their parent. The hydrogen atoms of water molecules
were located in the difference Fourier map and were refined as rid-
ing on their parent O atom. The crystal parameters, data collection
and refinement results for 1 and 2 are summarized in Table 1. Se-
lected bond lengths and angles are listed in Table S1 (see the Sup-
porting information).
performed on a Rigaku D/Max-IIIB X-ray diffractometer Cu K
a
(k = 1.5406 Å) radiation (40 kV and 200 mA) and Ni filter.
2.2. Synthesis
2.2.1. Synthesis of [Co(bimb)3](NO3)2ꢀ2H2O (1)
4,40-Bis(1H-imidazol-1-yl-methyl)biphenyl (bimb) was pre-
pared following the literature [41]. Co(NO3)2ꢀ6H2O (0.12 g,
0.40 mmol), bimb (0.13 g, 0.40 mmol), H2O (4 mL) and ethanol
(4 mL) were stirred for 10 min in air, before the mixture was trans-
ferred and sealed in a 20 mL Teflon-lined stainless autoclave,
which was heated at 140 °C for 3 days and then cooled to room
temperature. Pink crystals were obtained in 57% yield based on CoII
cation after washed with deionized water and ethanol. Anal. Calc.
for C60H58CoN14O8 (1162.12): C, 62.01; H, 5.03; N, 16.87. Found:
C, 62.09; H, 5.12; N, 16.72%. IR (KBr pellet, cmꢁ1): 3104 (w),
1502 (s), 1436 (m), 1359 (m), 1282 (m), 1223 (m), 1110 (m),
1081 (m), 1031 (w), 905 (m), 823 (m), 744 (s), 696 (w), 664 (m),
628 (w), 490 (m).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis
The crystals of complexes 1 and 2 were synthesized by hydro-
thermal reactions. The influences of the reaction conditions were
investigated. pH values have significant impacts on the quality of
the crystals and structure of the final products. For the synthesis
of complex 1 and 2, the suitable pH are 7–8 and 6–7, respectively.
The different products with uncertain structures would be ob-
tained as powder or microcrystal in other pH values conditions.
In addition, the influence of the solutions was also investigated
by changing the ratio of water and ethanol. However, the same
products were obtained with slight difference in the yields.
2.2.2. Synthesis of [Co(bimb)(bdc)]ꢀH2O (2)
The preparation of 2 was similar to that of 1 except that H2dpc
(0.07 g, 0.40 mmol) was used as auxiliary ligand, and then the pH
was adjust to 6–7 by 1 M NaOH solution. Brown block crystals
were filtered and washed with distilled water and ethanol (32%
yield based on CoII cation). Elemental Anal. Calc. for C28H24N4O5Co
(555.44): C, 60.55; H, 4.36; N, 10.09. Found: C, 60.62; H, 4.42; N,
10.01%. IR (KBr, cmꢁ1): 3435 (w), 3123 (w), 1700 (w), 1610 (m),
1581 (m), 1449 (m), 1396 (m), 1338 (w), 1281 (m), 1230 (m),
1187 (w), 1097 (s), 1005 (w), 952 (m), 830 (s), 803 (s), 754 (s),
691 (w), 626 (w), 505 (w).
3.2. Structure description
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis showed that the asym-
metric unit of 1 consists of three half bimb molecules, half of CoII
cation, one uncoordinated nitrate anion and one lattice water mol-
ecule (Fig. 1a). In 1, CoII cation lies on an inversion center, which is
six-coordinated in a octahedral environment defined by six N
atoms from six bimb molecules with the Co–N distances in range