3644
W. Zheng et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 3643–3646
According to the 3JH–H between the two vinyl protons in product
R1
SR2
H
R1
H
SR2
R1
E
SR2
H
R1
H
SR2
El
3 (Table 1), all of the coupling constants are less than 12 Hz, which
indicated the Z configuration of the product 3. The investigation of
1H NMR spectra of the crude products 3 showed the purity of (Z)-
isomer was above 99%. That is, the hydrozirconation of alkenyl sul-
fide underwent selectively a syn-addition.
and/or
E
ZrCp2Cp2Zr
Cl Cl
4
α−
β −4
(E)-2
(E)-2'
Scheme 2. Reaction of (E)-thioalenyl zirconocene 2 with electrophiles.
To determine the regiochemistry of the hydrozirconation, the
in situ prepared (E)-thioalkenyl zirconocene 2 in CH2Cl2 was
quenched with 1.0 equiv of other electrophiles at 0 °C and gave
the corresponding trisubstituted alkenyl sulfide 4 (Scheme 2).20
The results are listed in Table 2.
Table 2
Reaction of (E)-2 with electrophiles
Entry
R1
R2
Reagents
a
-4:b-4a
Yield of 4b (%)
With the treatment of DCl or NCS, the
a-substituted products
1
2
3
4
5
6
nBu
nBu
nHex
nHex
nBu
nPr
nBu
nPr
nBu
nPr
Bn
DCI/D20
DCI/D20
DCI/D20
DCI/D20
NCS
NCS
NCS
NCS
NBS
NBS
NBS
NBS
NBS
NIS
NIS
NIS
NIS
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
94:6
>99:1
>99:1
<1:99
<1:99
<1:99
12:88
<1:99
<1:99
10:90
22:78
26:74
56 (4a)
48 (4b)
52 (4c)
47 (4d)
48 (4e)
55 (4f)
52 (4g)
57 (4h)
85 (4i)
90 (4j)
78 (4k)
88 (4l)
68 (4m)
89 (4n)
85 (4o)
82 (4p)
79 (4q)
4a–h were generated in moderate to good yield. Owing to the cou-
pling and splitting data in the 1H NMR spectra of the products, the
regiochemistry of 4a–h are similar to the results of the literatures
(entries 1–8 in Table 2).11–16 Surprisingly, bromination or iodin-
ation of 2 chiefly gave b-substituted alkenyl sulfide (entries 9–17
in Table 2). Based on the same substrates (entry 5 and entry 10),
the regiochemistry of chlorination of 2 was contrary to that of
the bromination. Therefore, regiochemistry of halogenation of the
thioalkenyl zirconocene could be switched by different halides.
(E)-1-chloroalkenyl sulfide or (E)-2-haloalkenyl sulfide (Br, I) could
be obtained by treatment of NCS or NBS (NIS), respectively.
nBu
7
8
9
nBu
nHex
nBu
nBu
nBu
Et
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
nBu
nBu
nHex
nHex
nBu
nBu
nHex
nHex
nPr
nBu
nPr
nBu
Et
Bn
Et
Bn
As to the formation of the
a- or b-haloalkenyl sulfides, a
possible mechanism was hypothesized as follows (Scheme 3).11a
(E)-Thioalkenyl zirconocene 2 was generated from the hydrozirco-
nation of the alkynyl sulfide 1 followed by another addition of
a
Ratio of a
-4:b-4 is based on the 1H NMR spectra of the crude products of the
reactions.
Cp2Zr(H)Cl to 2 to result in
a,b-dizirconium species 5. There
b
Isolated yields.
achieved an equilibrium between the two intermediates of (E)-2
and 5 in this reactive system. Compound 5 was readily converted
into (E)-2 by syn-elimination with release of Cp2Zr(H)Cl because
the empty orbital in sulfur atom could stabilize the carbon anion
attached to zirconium. While Cl+ or D+ was addressed in the reac-
tion, the stabilized carbon anion could undergo electrophilic sub-
R1
H1
[Zr]1
H2
nBu
Cl
NCS
R1= nBu
R1
SR2
1
H1
H2
stitution as well as syn-elimination of [Zr]2–H2 to afford
a-4
6
7
Cp Zr(H)Cl
2
1.2 equiv.
(path a in Scheme 3). b-SR2 elimination with [Zr]2 would occur to
lead to (Z)-alkenyl zirconium 6, which was the probable reason
why the yields of 4a–h (entries 1–8 in Table 2) were lower than
those of b-bromides (4i–m) or iodides (4n–q). The chlorinated
product 7 was detected by GCMS.21 In the case of Br+ or I+, it was
a rigorous challenge for the larger size of the electrophiles to attack
β-Elimination
SR2
2[Zr]1
R1
H1
R1
H1
SR2
Cp Zr(H)Cl
2
[Zr]1
2H
[Zr]
+
(E)-2
+
E
L
E
2
S
5
b
a
2
1
1
-[Zr] H -[Zr] H
the sterically hindered a-C with two bulky groups, thioalkyl and
Syn-Elimination
R1
H
SR2
ES
zirconium. Thus b-anion of 5 was engaged in and underwent a
R1
EL
SR2
syn-elimination of [Zr]1–H1 to give b-4.
The in situ NMR of the mixture of the hydrozirconation of alkynyl
sulfide (R1 = nBu, R2 = nPr) was carried out (Fig. 1). Compound 5 and
(E)-2 were detected in the ratio of 63:37 as well as a trace amount of
(E)-20. As to compound 5, the C–H correlation spectroscopy showed
two dt peaks at 5.50 (J = 7.5, 5.8 Hz, H1) and 5.82 (J = 7.5, 1 Hz, H2)
ppm assignable to the two protons, respectively. In the species
H
α-4
-4
β
+
+
+
E
E
= Large electrophiles: Br , I
= Small electrophiles: D , Cl
[Zr] =
ZrCp2
Cl
L
+
+
+
S
Scheme 3. Mechanism of formation of thioalkenyl sulfide 2 and its regioselective
halogenation.
129.2
Table 1
126.0
nBu
SnPr
Synthesis of (Z) alkenyl sulfide 3
180.3
C
C
nBu
SnPr
148.9
H1
6.17(t)
C
[Zr]1
Entry
R1
R2
1H NMR of
a
-H to thio group
Yield of 3a (%)
H1
C
2[Zr]1
5.50(dt)
2H
3
[Zr]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
nBu
nBu
nBu
nBu
nBu
nHex
nHex
Ph
Et
nPr
iPr
nBu
Ph
nPr
nBu
nPr
Bn
5.91 (d, JH–H = 9.2 Hz, 1H)
72 (3a)
68 (3b)
54 (3c)
62 (3d)
59 (3e)
65 (3f)
61 (3g)
60 (3h)
66 (3i)
5.82(dt)
(E)-2
3
5
5.89 (d, JH–H = 9.6 Hz, 1H)
3
5.89 (d, JH–H = 9.6 Hz, 1H)
3
Figure 1. In situ NMR data of the mixture of hydrozirconation.
5.90 (d, JH–H = 9.2 Hz, 1H)
3
6.19 (d, JH–H = 9.2 Hz, 1H)
3
5.89 (d, JH–H = 9.6 Hz, 1H)
3
(E)-2, the sp2 carbon attached zirconium atom appeared character-
istically at 180.3 ppm and the other sp2 carbon at 148.9 ppm.22
When alkynyl sulfide (R1 = nBu, R2 = nPr), Schwart’s reagent, and
NBS were mixed together according to the comments of the re-
5.91 (d, JH–H = 9.2 Hz, 1H)
3
6.43 (d, JH–H = 10.8 Hz, 1H)
3
Ph
6.42 (d, JH–H = 11.2 Hz, 1H)
a
Isolated yields.