968
GOLOLOBOV et al.
X-ray diffraction analysis of compounds Ia, IIIa,
IIIb. The unit cell parameters and the intensity of the
reflections of compounds Ia, IIIa, IIIb were measured
on an automatic three-circle diffractometers Bruker
SMART APEX II CCD (λMoKα-radiation, graphite
monochromator, φ- and ω-scanning) (Ia) and Bruker
SMART 1000 CCD (λMoKα-radiation, graphite mono-
chromator, φ- and ω-scanning) (IIIa, IIIb). The main
crystallographic data are shown in Table 5. The struc-
tures of the compounds were solved by the direct
method and refined by the full matrix least squares
method in the anisotropic approximation for non-
hydrogen atoms. The hydrogen atoms of amino groups
were objectively localized by Fourier syntheses and
refined with the fixed positional and thermal
parameters. Positions of the remaining hydrogen atoms
were geometrically calculated and included into the
refinement with fixed positional (rider model) and
thermal parameters [Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C) for CH3-
groups and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) for all other groups].
All calculations were performed using SHELXTL
software package [9]. Tables of atomic coordinates,
bond lengths, bond angles, and anisotropic thermal
parameters for compounds Ia, IIIa, IIIb are deposited
in the Cambridge Structural Database.
Fig. 6. Crystal packing of the molecules of IIIb along the a
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
axis. Only hydrogen atoms involved into the hydrogen
bonding are represented. The dashed lines show the
intermolecular hydrogen bonds.
This work was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (grant no. 08-03-
00196a).
REFERENCES
The combined extracts were dried over anhydrous
sodium sulfate and potassium carbonate, and then
filtered. The solvent was removed, and the residue was
1. D’yachenko, V.D., Tkachev, R.P., and Bityukova, O.S.,
Zh. Org. Khim., 2008, vol. 44, p. 1591.
2. Gololobov, Yu.G., Gol’ding, I.R., Ter’ye, F., Petrov-
skii, P.V., Lysenko, K.A., and Garbuzova, I.A., Izv.
Akad. Nauk., Ser. Khim., 2009, p. 2365.
crystallized from
a
chloroform–petroleum ether
mixture (2:1). Yield 3.34 g (67%).
3. Kavalec, F., Manacek, V., and Sterba, V., Collect.
Chech. Chem. Commun., 1976, vol. 41, p. 590.
4. Gololobov, Yu.G., Linchenko, O.A., Gol’ding, I.R.,
Galkina, M.A., Krasnova, I.A, Garbuzova, and I.A.
Petrovskii, P.V., Izv. Akad. Nauk., Ser. Khim., 2005,
p. 2323.
5. Gololobov, Yu.G., Linchenko, O.A., Petrovskii, P.V.,
Starikova, Z.A., and Garbuzova, I.A., Heteroatom
Chem., 2007, vol. 18, p. 108.
6. International Tables for Crystallography, 2006, vol. C,
ch. 9.5, p. 790.
7. Domenicano, A., Vaciago, A., and Coulson, C.A., Acta
Cryst. (В), 1975, vol. 31, p. 221.
N-Methylmorpholinium N-methylcarboxamido-
2,4-dinitrocyclohexa-2,5-dienide (IIIa), triethyl-
ammonium and N-methylmorpholinium N-cyclo-
hexylcarboxamido-2,4-dinitrocyclohexa-2,5-dienides
(IIc, IIIc), triethylammonium and N-methylmor-
pholinium N-allylcarboxamido-2,4- dinitrocyclo-
hexa-2,5-dienides (IIb, IIIb) were obtained by the
general procedure. To a solution of 1 mmol of the
amide I in 8 ml of a diethyl ether–MeCN mixture (1:1)
was added a solution of 0.2 g (2 mmol) of triethyl-
amine or N-methylmorpholine in 4 ml of ether. The
mixture was stirred for 5 h at 20°C. After adding 4 ml
of petroleum ether, the mixture was kept overnight at –
10°C. The carmine red precipitate was separated,
washed with ether, and dried in vacuum.
8. Domenicano, A. and Vaciago, A., Acta Crystallogr. (В),
1979, vol. 35, p. 1382.
9. Sheldrick, G.M., Acta Crystallogr. (А), 2008, vol. 64,
p. 112.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 83 No. 5 2013