R. Yunoki et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 4102–4105
4103
Table 1
Scope of nucleophiles
NHEWG
F
NHEWG
Nu
Nucleophile
Base
N
N
R1
R1
NHCO2Me
NHCO2Me
Nu
N
N
R2 R3
R2 R3
Nucleophile (1.5 equiv)
α-fluorohydrazonesa
3−17b
F
K2CO3 (3 equiv)
Ph
Ph
1 (1.0 equiv)
2a−jg
THF, rt
NNHBoc
OMe
3: 30 min, 74%c
NNHBoc
N
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Entry
Nucleophile
Nu
Time
Yield (%)
O
4: 5.5 h, 97%c
1a
2a
3c
4d
MeOHb
MeO
CF3CH2O
AcO
2a
15 min
3 h
68
91
49
81
CF3CH2OHb
AcONa
2b
2c
2d
NNHTs
NNHAc
4 h
2 h
Me2NHÁHCle
Me2N
CH(CO2Me)2
CH(CO2Me)2
Ph
5: 12 h, 57%
6: 24 h, 32%
5
2e
7 h
95
O
NH
O
N
6f
7
TMSN3
PhSH
N3
PhS
2f
2g
5 min
3 h
89
95
NNHCO2Me
OMe
NNHCO2Me
OMe
NNHCO2Me
CH(CO2Me)2
8: 24 h, 80%c
Ph
O
Ph
7: 10 min, 71%c
9: 30 min, 87%
p-Tol
S
8
9
p-TolSO2Na
2h
2i
2.5 h
24 h
69
82
O
NNHCO2Me
NNHCO2Me
SPh
(CO2Me)2CH
(CO2Me)2CH2
Ph
N
BnO
O
O
O
10: 6 h, 95%
11: 6 h, 97%
CO2Et
CO2Et
10d
2j
4 h
64
NNHCO2Me
NNHCO2Me
CH(CO2Me)2
12: 6.5 h, 67%
Me
CH(CO2Me)2
gIsomer ratios (approximately estimated by 1H NMR): 2a (65:35), 2b (78:22), 2c
(>95:5), 2d (>95:5), 2e (76:24), 2f (80:20), 2g (58:42), 2h (55:45), 2i (75:25), 2j
(>95:5).
13: 48 h, 65%
Me
NNHCO2Me
OMe
NNHCO2Me
N3
a
1.5 equiv of K2CO3 was used.
Used as a solvent instead of THF.
DMF was used as a solvent instead of THF.
65 °C.
b
Ph
Ph
c
Me
Me
d
14: 1 h, 65%
15: 30 min, 75%
e
3 equiv.
NNHCO2Me
OMe
NNHCO2Me
f
DBU was used instead of K2CO3.
NMe2
Me
Ph
Ph
Me
Me
Me
as a model substrate to test nucleophiles. Results of reactions of 1
with a variety of nucleophiles are summarized in Table 1. Treat-
ment of 1 with potassium carbonate (1.5 equiv) in methanol
16: 1 h, 75%c
17: 2 h, 79%c
Figure 1. Scope of substrates. Same conditions are used for each nucleophile.
aStarting materials were used as mixtures of two isomers (ca. 80:20À95:5) unless
otherwise noted. bIsomer ratios (approximately estimated by 1H NMR): 3 (>95:5), 4
(>95:5), 5 (91:9), 6 (>95:5), 7 (>95:5), 8 (>95:5), 9 (82:18), 10 (94:6), 11 (70:30), 12
(83:17), 13 (75:25), 14 (>95:5), 15 (91:9), 16 (>95:5), 17 (95:5). cSingle isomers of
starting materials were used.
(0.2 M) at room temperature caused methanolysis to afford
a-
methoxyhydrazone 2a in 68% yield (entry 1).11 The reaction with
2,2,2-trifluoroethanol gave the corresponding substituted product
2b in excellent yield under similar conditions (entry 2). Acetoxyla-
tion of 1 with sodium acetate proceeded in N,N-dimethylformam-
ide (DMF) to give compound 2c in moderate yield (entry 3).
Reactions of 1 with amines such as dimethylamine and morpholine
were fast and afforded the corresponding amine compounds 2d
and 2c in 81% and 95% yields (entries 4 and 5).12 When sodium
azide was used for azidation of 1, azide compound 2f was obtained,
but the yield was moderate (46%, not shown in Table 1). We soon
found that a combination of trimethylsilylazide (TMSN3) and 1,8-
diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) gave 2f in improved yield
(89%) (entry 6). Sulfur nucleophiles such as benzenethiol and so-
dium p-toluenesufinate readily reacted with 1 to provide the corre-
sponding sulfide 2g and sulfone 2h in good yields (entries 7 and 8).
When dimethylmalonate and ethyl 2-oxocyclohexanecarboxylate
were employed as nucleophiles, CÀC bond formation on the CÀF
bond of 1 occurred to give compounds 2i and 2j (entries 9 and 10).
NNHCO2Me
F
NNHCO2Me
OMe
MeOK (5 equiv)
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
MeOH, rt
30 min
F
OMe
19: 92%
18
NNHCO2Me
NNHCO2Me
OMe
MeOK (5 equiv)
F
F
MeOH, reflux
72 h
OMe
F
OMe
21: 80%
20
Scheme 2. Reactions of di- and trifluorohydrazone derivatives.
a
,a
-Difluorohydrazone 18 (single isomer) reacted with methox-
ide anions to give dimethylacetal 19 (single isomer) (Scheme 2).9
Examples of reactions between various
a-fluorohydrazones and
nucleophiles are shown in Figure 1. -Fluorohydrazones bearing
a
In this reaction, replacement of potassium carbonate by potassium
tert-butoxycarbonyl or p-toluenesulfonyl groups gave the corre-
methoxide (5 equiv) gave a better result. Interestingly,
luorohydrazone 20 (single isomer) also underwent a substitution
reaction of all fluorine atoms to give -trimethoxyhydrazone
a,a,a-trif-
sponding substituted products 3À5 in good yields, whereas prod-
uct
6 was obtained in only 32% yield from an acetylated
a,a,a
hydrazone material. This might be due to the difference in the elec-
tronic properties of carbamates and amides. Substitution reactions
of hydrazones possessing other side chains, such as phenyl, benzyl,
benzyloxybutyl, heptenyl, and isopropyl, smoothly produced vari-
ous substituted derivatives 7À13 in good yields. Secondary and
tertiary fluoro derivatives also caused substitution reactions with
oxygen and nitrogen nucleophiles and afforded products 14À17.
21 (single isomer) in high yield, though a high temperature (reflux
in methanol) and long reaction time (72 h) were required
(Scheme 2).9,13
Exposure of
complicated the result, and no substituted product was isolated
from the reaction mixture. In addition, -trifluoroketone 23
did not react with potassium methoxide at all (Scheme 3). Com-
a-fluoroketone 22 to the methanolysis conditions
a,a,a