M. Seki et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 4230–4234
4233
On the basis of these findings, 5e was selected for further phar-
macological evaluation. The neuroprotective effect of 5e was eval-
uated in rats with a transient MCAO model.14 Subcutaneous
administration of 5e (0.8, 2.5, and 8.2 mg/kg) 30 min after occlu-
sion produced neuroprotective action in a dose-dependent manner
(27%, 37%, and 56% at 0.8, 2.5, and 8.2 mg/kg, respectively). More-
over, 5e at 8.2 mg/kg exhibited significant reduction in the size of
cerebral infarction compared with the vehicle [166.7 42.9 mm3
(n = 5) versus 379.8 43.8 mm3 (n = 6) (mean SEM), ⁄⁄p <0.01
(Student’s t-test)]. Since the effect of a drug on action potential
duration at 90% repolarization (APD90) prolongation is considered
of primary relevance in the context of a proarrhythmic potential
accompanying QT prolongation,15 we evaluated the effects of 5e
O
a
b
2HCl
N
HN
HN
N
N
O
O
16
15
cis-17
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) cyclohexylamine, p-TsOH, toluene, reflux
(94%); (b) (i) BH3ÁTHF, THF, reflux, (ii) 4 N HCl/EtOAc, EtOAc (44%).
Table 3
Effects of compound 5e and crobenetine on ADP90
(10, 30, and 100 lM) and crobenetine hydrochloride (3, 10, and
a
Compound
Concentration (
l
M)
APD90 (%)
30 lM) on APD90 prolongation in isolated guinea pig papillary
Crobenetine hydrochloride
3
10
30
96.6 0.6
89.1 1.6
72.9 10.2
muscles.16 As shown in Table 3, both compounds did not prolong
APD90. Compound 5e slightly shortened APD90 (9.2 2.7% at
100
l
M), whereas crobenetine substantially shortened APD90
5e
10
30
100
95.3 0.7
92.3 0.7
90.8 2.7
(27.1 10.2% at 30
tential for cardiac adverse effects.
lM), suggesting that 5e may have a lower po-
In conclusion, we discovered a novel and potent Na+ channel
blocker 5e, which showed remarkably in vivo neuroprotective
activity and reduced hERG-blocking activity. The effect of 5e on
APD90 prolongation was also investigated, and it was revealed that
5e had a low risk of drug-induced QT prolongation. Further studies
and results will be reported in due course.
a
APD90: action potential duration at 90% repolarization; %: percent change from
before treatment value. Each value represents the mean SEM of three cell
preparations.
(2E)-3-cyclohexylacrylate (7) readily prepared from cyclohexane-
carboxaldehyde by the Horner–Emmons reaction yielded trans-8
stereospecifically. Hydrolysis of 8, followed by the Curtius rear-
rangement with diphenyl phosphoryl azide (DPPA) afforded 9.
The tert-butyl carbamate (Boc) group of 9 was removed by treat-
ment with hydrochloric acid to give 10. Benzoylation of 10, fol-
lowed by reduction of the amide group afforded 11a. Acylation of
10 with cyclohexanecarbonyl chloride provided 11b, which was
then converted into 11c by reduction of the amide group. Reduc-
tive alkylation of 10 with cyclohexanone furnished 11d. Synthesis
of 1-cyclohexylpyrrolidine analogues 14a and 14b is depicted in
Scheme 3. Compound 12 was obtained from 5e by protection of
the cyclohexylamine group with a Boc group. Removal of the ben-
zyl group of 12 by catalytic hydrogenation yielded 13. Reductive
alkylation of 13 with cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde or cyclohexa-
none afforded 14a or 14b, respectively.
Biological evaluation results for 11a–d, 14a, and 14b are shown
in Table 2. Replacement of the 4-phenyl group on the pyrrolidine
ring with a 4-cyclohexyl group led to a decrease in Na+ channel
inhibitory activity (5b vs 11a, 5c vs 11b, 5d vs 11c, and 5e vs
11d). On the other hand, the hERG-blocking activity of the 4-cyclo-
hexyl analogues 11a, 11b, and 11d tended to increase compared
with that of the 4-phenyl analogues 5b, 5c, and 5e, respectively.
Although 1-cyclohexylmethylpyrrolidine 14a showed Na+ channel
inhibitory activity similar to that of 1-benzylpyrrolidine 5e, its
hERG-blocking activity was potentiated. Introduction of a 1-cyclo-
hexyl group (14b) substantially lowered Na+ channel inhibitory
activity. These results suggest that the cyclohexyl group at the 3-
position on the pyrrolidine ring would be crucial to reduce hERG
inhibition.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Yukimi Yoneyama, Hiroyuki Harada,
Makiko Asayama, and Hiroyuki Sato for performing pharmacolog-
ical and toxicological evaluation.
References and notes
6. Gandolfo, C.; Sandercock, P. A. G.; Conti, M. Cochrane Databese Syst. Rev. 2002,
8. Enecadin hydrochloride, crobenetine hydrochloride, SUN N8075, and
The attractive biological profiles of 5e encouraged us to exam-
ine its stereoisomers. Thus, cis-pyrrolidine 17 was synthesized
(Scheme 4) and evaluated for its inhibitory action against Na+
and hERG channels.12 Compound 15 was prepared according to
the previously reported procedure.13 Amination of 15 with cyclo-
hexcylamine in the presence of a catalytic amount of p-toluenesul-
fonic acid (p-TsOH) yielded 16. Reduction of 16 with borane
tetrahydrofuran complex afforded cis-17 as a major product (cis/
trans = 81/19). Compound 17 maintained Na+ channel inhibitory
compound 1 exhibited hERG inhibition by 60%, 69%, 78%, and 99% at 1 lM,
respectively. The hERG inhibitory activity was assessed by a conventional
voltage patch-clamp technique.
K.; Nakamura, Y. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1982, 685, 289.
activity (IC50 = 0.56
more potent than that of 5e (28% for 17 vs 8.4% for 5e at 1
lM), whereas its hERG-blocking activity was
12. The enantiomers of ( )-trans-5e showed a low eudysmic ratio (the IC50 values
of (+)- and (À)-trans-5e were 0.54 and 0.57
lM, respectively). These
lM).