aldehydes,6 and the transition-metal-catalyzed reactions of
R,β-unsaturated enones, vinyl ethers, or aldehydes with
varied diazo compounds.7 Dihydrofurans can also be
obtained by the ring enlargement of suitably substituted
cyclopropanes, catalyzed by Lewis acids, metals, or strong
oxidizing agents,8 which has become a complementary but
powerful approach.
Anion relay chemistry (ARC) has been demonstrated as
an effective protocol for diversity-oriented construction of
natural and unnatural molecules of higher complexity, and
tremendous progress has been made.9 The group of Smith
III has presented a variety of elegant Brook-rearrangement-
based anion relay reactions over the past decade. Recently,
we reported a Michael addition-initiated aza-oxy-carbanion
relay by the reaction of 1-cinnamoylcyclopropanecarbox-
amides with selected electrophiles (Scheme 1, left pathway).10
In continuation of this work, we wish to explore the
possibility of an organocatalyzed anion relay cascade
(Scheme 1, right pathway).11 As a result, a new concept
of an organocatalyzed anion relay cascade is established
and has been applied in the construction of functionalized
2,3-dihydrofurans.
Initially, the model reaction of 1-cinnamoyl-N-benzyl-
cyclopropanecarboxamide 1a was examined under basic
conditions (Table 1).12 No reaction occurred by the utiliza-
tion of Et3N as the base in DMSO at 110 °C, and the
substrate may be retractable quantitatively (entry 1).
In the reaction with DBU (1.2 equiv) as the base, substrate
1a decomposed completely within 0.5 h (entry 2). To our
delight, DABCO (1.0 equiv) gave the expected (E)-N-
benzyl-2-(4-methylstyryl)-4,5-dihydrofuran-3-carboxamide
2a in 90% yield under otherwise identical conditions
(entry 3).13 The amount of DABCO could be reduced to
be 0.2 equiv without significantly sacrificing the yield
(entry 4). A further decrease of the amount of DABCO
to 0.1 equiv or lowering the temperature to 90 °C may lead
to dramatically decreased yields (entries 5 and 6). Other
solvents, such as DMF, toluene, DCE, MeCN, and THF
proved to be inferior to DMSO (entries 7ꢀ11).
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa
Scheme 1
base
t
time
(h)
2a yield
(%)b
entry
(equiv)
solvent
(°C)
1
2
3
Et3N (1.0)
DBU (1.2)
DABCO
(1.0)
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
110
12
0.5
3
n.r.
0
110
110
90
4
DABCO
(0.2)
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMF
110
3
89
67
45
76
5
5
DABCO
(0.1)
110
4
(8) (a) Alonso, M. E.; Morales, A. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 4530.
(b) Yadav, V. K.; Balamurugan, R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2717.
(c) Bowman, R. K.; Johnson, J. S. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 573. (d) Bernard,
A. M.; Frongia, A.; Piras, P. P.; Secci, F.; Spiga, M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
4565. (e) Lee, P. H.; Kim, J. S.; Kim, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 7583.
(f) Nakajima, T.; Segi, M.; Mituoka, T.; Fukute, Y.; Honda, M.; Naitou,
K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 1667. (g) Zhang, R.; Liang, Y.; Zhou, G.;
Wang, K.; Dong, D. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8089.
6
DABCO
(0.2)
90
3.5
1
7
DABCO
(0.2)
110
8
DABCO
(0.2)
toluene
DCE
110
12
12
12
12
(9) For reviews on ARC: (a) Smith, A. B., III; Wuest, W. M. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 5883. (b) Smith, A. B., III; Adams, C. M. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2004, 37, 365. (c) Moser, W. H. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2065. For
elegant work by Smith: (d) Smith, A. B., III; Kim, W. S.; Tong, R. B.
Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 588. (e) Smith, A. B., III; Tong, R. B. Org. Lett. 2010,
12, 1260. (f) Smith, A. B., III; Kim, W. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2011, 108, 6787. (g) Smith, A. B., III; Tong, R. B.; Kim, W. S.; Maio,
W. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 8904. (h) Smith, A. B., III; Han,
H.; Kim, W. S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3328. (i) Smith, A. B., III; Hoye,
A. T.; Martinez-Solorio, D.; Kim, W.-S.; Tong, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012, 134, 4533. (j) Sokolsky, A.; Smith, A. B., III. Org. Lett. 2012, 14,
4470. (k) Sanchez, L.; Smith, A. B., III. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 6314. For
multicomponent ARC, see: (l) Bevarie-Baez, N. O.; Kim, W.-S.; Smith,
A. B.; Xian, M., III. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1861. For carbon-to-carbon
ARC: (m) Zheng, P. G.; Cai, Z. X.; Garimallaprabhakaran, A.;
Rooshenas, P.; Schreiner, P. R.; Harmata, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2011, 27, 5255. For dianion relay: (n) Li, H.; Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Zhao,
F.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, W.-X.; Xi, Z. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 7399.
Other examples: (o) Gao, L.; Lin, X.; Lei, J.; Song, Z.; Lin, Z. Org. Lett.
2012, 14, 158. (p) Yan, L.; Sun, X.; Li, H.; Song, Z.; Liu, Z. Org. Lett.
2013, 15, 1104.
9
DABCO
(0.2)
reflux
reflux
reflux
0
10
11
DABCO
(0.2)
MeCN
THF
0
DABCO
(0.2)
0
a Reactions were carried out with 1a (1.0 mmol) and the base in
solvent (4.0 mL). b Isolated yield.
Under the optimized conditions (Table 1, entry 4), a
range of reactions were carried out with various substrates
1 (Table 2). The substituents R1 on substrates 1 may be
(12) In the cases of tertiary amine as the base, the intramolecular aza-
Michael addition is inhibited. See: (a) Reference 10. (b) Li, Y.; Xu, X.;
Tan, J.; Liao, P.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 244. (c) Liu, J.;
Lin, S.; Ding, H.; Wei, Y.; Liang, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 6349.
(13) The CdC double bond in all the products is in (E)-conformation,
which were assigned based on the 1H NMR spectra and single-crystal
data. Also refer to: Sonye, J. P.; Koide, K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 199.
(10) Our work on ARC: (a) Liang, F.; Lin, S.; Wei, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 1781. (b) Lin, S.; Wei, Y.; Liang, F.; Zhao, B.; Liu, Y.;
Liu, P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 4571.
(11) For selected papers on organocascade catalysis, see: (a)Grondal,
C.; Jeanty, M.; Enders, D. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 167. (b) Jones, S.; Simmons,
B.; Mastracchio, A.; MacMillan, D. Nature 2011, 475, 183.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 15, 2013
3979