compounds have served as starting materials for the
preparation of spiroacetal natural products,12 cis-fused
bicyclic ethers13 by a tandem Achmatowicz reaction/
spiroacetalization approach, and spirocyclic ethers by
Piancatelli rearrangement.14 2-(ω-Hydroxyalkyl)furans
are generally prepared by alkylation15 or acylation16 of
2-lithiofurans or by addition of organolithium reagents
to furfural.17 In addition, furans with a polyhydroxylated
Employing the conditions optimized for the cross-
coupling of aryl bromides and aryl iodides [Pd(dppf)Cl2
(2 mol %), NaOH (2 equiv), dioxane/H2O (4:1), microwave
irradiation (MW), 100 °C, 10 min followed by pTsOH
(2.2 equiv), rt, 10 min] to a panel of subsituted 3-bromo-
or 3-iodoallylic alcohols, a series of polysubstituted 2-(ω-
hydroxyalkyl)furans were successfully prepared in moder-
ate to excellent yields (Table 1).23
sidechain can beconvenientlysynthesizedusingtheGarcıa
´
18
ꢀ
Gonzalez reaction. Allylation of dienol carbonates fol-
lowed by a Cope rearrangement/reduction/dehydration
sequence, recently proposed by our group, leads to a
variety of polysubstituted furans.19 A number of metal-
catalyzed furan syntheses have been developed using Au-,
Hg-, Ir-, Rh-, Ru-, Pd- and Cu-catalyzed transformations
of suitably substituted alkynes, allenes and cyclopropenes.20
Strong base-catalyzed21 and oxidative22 cyclizations of
2-penten-4-yn-1-ols can also lead to polysubstituted fur-
ans, and acidic treatment of γ-hydroxy-R,β-unsaturated
ketones has been reported to induce furan ring closure
under mild conditions.23
Table 1. Preparation of Furans 13À23
Recently, we have reported a rapid and high-yielding
preparation of spiroacetals based on a tandem Suzuki-
Miyaura/acid-catalyzed spiroacetalization.24 Herein, we dis-
close the outcome of a process involving (Z)-3-haloallylic
alcohols instead of 2-halobenzylic alcohols. Upon in situ
acidic treatement of the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling prod-
ucts, substituted furans were formed instead of the ex-
pected spiroacetals (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Tandem Suzuki-Miyaura Coupling/Acid-catalyzed
Cyclization
a Yield increased to 34% when the cross-coupling was performed
under anhydrous conditions (MeCN, 2 equiv Cs2CO3); 3 equiv of TsOH
was used for cyclization.
The halogenated allylic alcohols were prepared accord-
ing to literature procedures.25 From a reactivity stand-
point, there was no difference between bromo- and
iodoalkenes under the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling condi-
tions, so the substrates were chosen according to their ease
of access. The alcohols 3À12 were treated with boronate 1
or 2 under the previously described conditions.24 The cou-
pling with dihydrofuranyl boronate 1 (Table 1, entry 1)
suffered from significantly lower yield because of the
sensitivity of the starting boronate and the cross-coupling
intermediate. The yields with boronate 2 were generally
good to excellent for both 3-bromo- and 3-iodoallylic
alcohols. 2,3-, 2,4-, 2,5-disubstitued furans (Table 1,
entries 1À4), 2,3,4- and 2,3,5-trisubstituted (Table 1,
(15) (a) Stevens, K.; Madder, A. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 1555–1565.
(b) Craft, D. T.; Gung, B. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 5931–5934.
(16) (a) Tofi, M.; Montagnon, T.; Georgiou, T.; Vassilikogiannakis,
G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 772–777. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Aversa,
R. J.; Jin, J.; Rivas, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6855–6861.
(17) (a) Princival, J. L.; de Barros, S. M. G.; Comasseto, J. V.; Dos
Santos, A. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 4423–4425. (b) Zhou, X.; Wu,
W.; Liu, X.; Lee, C.-S. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5525–5528.
(18) (a) Scherrmann, M.-C. Top. Curr. Chem. 2010, 295 (Carbohy-
drates in Sustainable Development II), 1–18. (b) Nagarapu, L.; Chary,
M. V.; Satyender, A.; Supriya, B.; Bantu, R. Synthesis 2009, 2278–2282.
ꢀ
~
(c) Bartoli, G.; Fernandez-Bolanos, J. G.; Di Antonio, G.; Foglia, G.;
Giuli, S.; Gunnella, R.; Mancinelli, M.; Marcantoni, E.; Paoletti, M.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6029–6036.
(19) Fournier, J.; Arseniyadis, S.; Cossy, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 7562–7566.
(20) (a) Gulevich, A. V.; Dudnik, A. S.; Chernyak, N.; Gevorgyan, V.
Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 3084–3213. (b) Kirsch, S. F. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2006, 4, 2076 and references therein.
(21) Marshall, J. A.; Bennett, C. E. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 6110–
6113.
(22) (a) Du, X.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 9495–
9498. (b) Du, X.; Chen, H.; Chen, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, Y. Synlett 2011,
1010–1014.
(23) (a) Iriye, R.; Uno, T.; Ohwa, I.; Konishi, A. Agric. Biol. Chem.
1990, 54, 1841–1843. (b) Lee, P. H.; Kim, H. S.; Kim, S. Chem. Lett.
1994, 2401–2402. (c) Sammond, D. M.; Sammakia, T. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 6065–6068. (d) Donohoe, T. J.; Bower, J. F. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107, 3373–3376.
(24) Butkevich, A. N.; Corbu, A.; Meerpoel, L.; Stansfield, I.;
Angibaud, P.; Bonnet, P.; Cossy, J. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4998–5001.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX