(TIPDS)-, and 2,3-O-xylylene protected thioglycosides has
shown special promise.5,6e Alternatively, 20-carboxybenzyl
(CB) glycoside4a and p-cresol thioglycoside4b,c methodolo-
gies have also been reported by Kim and Lowary, respec-
tively, to be effective for the direct β-arabinosylations.
Recently, Demchenko and co-workers developed a nov-
el hydrogen-bond-mediated aglycone delivery strategy
for stereoselective synthesis of oligosaccharides.7 The basic
concept of their strategy relies on the fact that the inter-
molecular hydrogen bonding interaction formed between
the donor and acceptor can directthe accessof the acceptor
to one specific face of the donor ring. Based on this
strategy, various pyranosides including challenging R-glu-
co-, β-manno-, and β-rhamnosides were stereoselectively
synthesized.
Here, we sought to apply the H-bonding-assisted
glycosylation approach to the construction of 1,2-cis-
β-arabinofuranosides.8 Thus, a set of Araf donors 1ꢀ3,
all carrying a directing group at the 5-position, were
designed (Scheme 1). The sp2-hybridized nitrogen within
the 5-O-substituents can function as a H-bond acceptor. It
is anticipated that, in a typical glycosylation process, the
acceptor is first tethered via a H-bond with an arabinosyl
donor to form A. Upon activation, the nucleophilic attack
of the acceptor on the anomeric center will occur prefer-
entially from the β-side of the resulting oxacarbenium ion
B, thereby leading to a β-linked Araf glycoside C. In this
Letter, we report the development of a new β-arabino-
furanosylation method using 5-O-(2-quinolinecarbonyl)
(Quin) substituted thioglycosides as glycosyl donors and
demonstrate the efficiency the method possesses through
the stereoselective synthesis of a mannose-capped octasac-
charide fragment from mycobacterial LAM.
Scheme 2. Preparation of Donors 1ꢀ3
The designed 5-O-substituted donors 1ꢀ3 were readily
made as illustrated in Scheme 2. The known thioglycoside
49 was treated with 2-picolinic acid to furnish thioglycoside 1
in 92% yield. Compound 1was then converted into trichloro-
acetimidate 2 through a two-step activation procedure
(Scheme 2, eq 1).10 The synthesis of ethyl thioglycoside
derivatives 3aꢀd began with regioselective 5-O-protection
of 511 as a TBDPS ether. The obtained 6 was in turn
subjected to 2,3-O-benzylation and followed by 5-O-desi-
lylation to provide alcohol 74d (65% yield for the two
steps). Esterification of 7 with a series of carboxylic acids in
CH2Cl2 gave the required 3aꢀd in excellent yields (eq 2).
With the donors 1ꢀ3 in hand, we first explored their
reactions with Araf alcohols 8ꢀ10 (Table 1). All glycosyla-
tions were run employing 1.3 equiv of the donor (5 mM) and
1 equiv of the acceptor in the presence of the NIS/TfOH
system or TMSOTf for thioglycoside (1and 3) and trichloro-
acetimidate (2) donors, respectively, in dry ClCH2CH2Cl.
The product stereochemistry was determined by 1H NMR
spectroscopy in CDCl3.12 For the R-anomer, JH1,H2 is
3
∼2.0 Hz, while, for the β-anomer, 3JH1,H2 is ∼5.0 Hz.
The effect of the anomeric leaving group of the donor
on the reaction outcome was examined first. As a result,
the glycosylations of 1, 2, and 3a all bearing a Pico
(2-pyridinecarbonyl) group on O-5 with model 3-OH accep-
tor 8 afforded disaccharide glycoside 11a with equally satis-
factory 1,2-cis stereoselectivity (β/R 10:1, Table 1, entries
1ꢀ3). Among the three donors tested, the ethyl thioglycoside
3a showed the highest reactivity in terms of reaction tem-
perature and time and generated an excellent 85% yield of
11a (entry 3).
Scheme 1. Design of Potential Glycosyl Donors for
β-Arabinofuranosylation
Next, the influence of the 5-O-directing group on reac-
tion stereoselectivity was studied. As shown in Table 1,
entries 4ꢀ7, the glycosylations of the diversely 5-substi-
tuted ethyl thioglycosides 3aꢀd with acceptors 9 and 10
(5) (a) Zhu, X.-M.; Kawatkar, S.; Rao, Y.; Boons, G.-J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 11948. (b) Ishiwata, A.; Akao, H.; Ito, Y. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 5525. (c) Crich, D.; Pedersen, C. M.; Bowers, A. A.; Wink, D. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2007, 72, 1553. (d) Joe, M.; Bai, Y.; Nacario, R. C.; Lowary, T. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9885. (e) Wang, Y.-X.; Maguire-Boyle, S.;
Dere, R. T.; Zhu, X.-M. Carbohydr. Res. 2008, 343, 3100. (f) Imamura,
A.; Lowary, T. L. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3686.
(7) Yasomanee, J. P.; Demchenko, A. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012,
134, 20097.
(8) For a recent review on stereoselective glycosylation through an
intramolecular aglycone delivery (IAD) method, see: Ishiwata, A.; Lee,
Y. J.; Ito, Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 3596.
(9) Liang, X.-Y.; Bin, H.-C.; Yang, J.-S. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 2834.
(10) Schmidt, R. R.; Jung, K.-H. In Preparative Carbohydrate Chem-
istry; Hanessian, S., Ed.; Dekker: New York, 1997; p 283.
(11) Hou, D.-J.; Taha, H. A.; Lowary, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 12937.
(12) Mizutani, K.; Kasai, R.; Nakamura, M.; Tanaka, O.; Matsuura,
H. Carbohydr. Res. 1989, 185, 27.
(6) (a) Marotte, K.; Sanchez, S.; Bamhaoud, T.; Prandi, J. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 3587. (b) Bamhaoud, T.; Sanchez, S.; Prandi, J. Chem.
Commun. 2000, 659. (c) Gadikota, R. R.; Callam, C. S.; Wagner, T.;
Fraino, B. D.; Lowary, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4155. (d)
Ishiwata, A.; Munemura, Y.; Ito, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 4250. (e)
Ishiwata, A.; Ito, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 2275. (f) Thadke, S. A.;
Mishra, B.; Hotha, S. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 2466.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX