ChemComm
Communication
could also be explained by this model as the pore size is wider than
that for cyclic peptides (B7 Å). However, a carrier mechanism, though
unlikely cannot be ruled out.
In conclusion, a new class of readily accessible ion transpor-
ters has been derived from acyclic octapeptides containing
L/D alanine and m-aminobenzoic acid. These peptides are more
efficient than their cyclic analog in terms of synthesis and ion
transport activity, making them extremely attractive for develop-
ment of novel materials. CD, XRD and computational studies
allude to ion mediation via a tetrameric pore. This model
explains the higher transport activity, wider nanotube bundle
formation and lower cation selectivity by the acyclic peptides as
compared to their cyclic analog. Efforts are underway for enhan-
cing and modulating ion transport through these peptides.
This research was supported by DST (SR/S1/OC-41/2009),
New Delhi, India. B.P.B acknowledges CSIR, India for a research
fellowship. We thank Mr V. Ramkumar for X-Ray crystallo-
graphic analysis and Dr E. Prasad for the use of his DLS
instrument. We thank SAIF and the Dept. of Metallurgical and
Materials Engineering I.I.T. Madras for SEM and TEM images.
Fig. 3 (a) CD spectrum of peptide 1 (0.25 mM in methanol); (b) ORTEP diagram
of tetrapeptide 7.
computations.21 Frequency calculations were carried out subse-
quently to confirm minima.31 Peptide 1 was found to be S-shaped
(C-shaped from top), indicating that two peptides could align sideways
to form a pore. Such a dimer would present the alanine methyl groups
on the surface and facilitate membrane insertion as well as stabilize
the channel within the membrane. The most active peptide 2 has
polar carboxy groups which would presumably face the water–channel
interface. Therefore, to get basic insights into the self-assembly of
peptide 1, the equilibrium geometry of the laterally aligned peptide
dimer having the carboxy termini onthesamesidewasdeterminedby
AM1 calculations (Fig. 4a and b).21 The optimization resulted in a
dimeric pore which was 6–9 Å wide and B20 Å long. One can envision
two such dimers aligning in a head to head fashion to span the lipid
bilayer which has a thickness of B40 Å (Fig. 4c). The assembly would
place 8 aromatic units in the channel scaffold similar to Gramicidin A.
The model explains the enhanced activity of the acyclic peptides as
compared to the cyclic peptide as the self-assembly is curtailed to half
of that required for the cyclic peptides.19 Such an assembly could also
explain the enhanced activity of peptide 2 where all four carboxy
groups would be at the peptide–water interface. The non-selective ion
transport in the HPTS assay and thicker bundles seen in TEM images
Notes and references
1 B. Hille, Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes, Sinauer, Sunderland,
MA, 3rd edn, 2001.
2 F. Xia, W. Guo, Y. Mao, X. Hou, J. Xue, H. Xia, L. Wang, Y. Song, H. Ji,
Q. Ouyang, Y. Wang and L. Jiang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 8345.
3 Q. H. Nguyen, M. Ali, R. Neumann and W. Ensinger, Sens. Actuators,
B, 2012, 162, 216.
4 S. Hagihara, L. Gremaud, G. Bollot, J. Mareda and S. Matile, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 4347.
5 H. Bayley and P. S. Cremer, Nature, 2001, 413, 226.
6 P.-L. Boudreault and N. Voyer, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2007, 5, 1459.
7 N. Sakai, J. Mareda and S. Matile, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1354.
8 J. K. W. Chui and T. M. Fyles, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 148.
9 G. W. Gokel and I. A. Carasel, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 378.
10 K. S. Akerfeldt, J. D. Lear, Z. R. Wasserman, L. A. Chung and
W. F. DeGrado, Acc. Chem. Res., 1993, 26, 191.
ˇ
11 R. Pajewski, R. Ferdani, J. Pajewska, N. Djedovic, P. H. Schlesinger
and G. W. Gokel, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2005, 3, 619.
12 N. Busschaert and P. A. Gale, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1374.
13 B. A. Wallace, Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 1992, 57, 59.
14 U. Koert and J. R. Pfeifer, Synthesis, 2004, 1129.
15 U. Koert, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2005, 7, 1501.
16 P. Reiß, L. Al-Momani and U. Koert, ChemBioChem, 2008, 9, 377.
17 H. Itoh, S. Matsuoka, M. Kreir and M. Inoue, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012,
134, 14011.
18 H. Itoh and M. Inoue, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, DOI: 10.1021/ar300315p.
19 D. T. Bong, T. D. Clark, J. R. Granja and M. R. Ghadiri, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 988.
20 R. J. Brea, C. Reiriz and J. R. Granja, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 1448.
21 See ESI† for details.
22 R. Hourani, C. Zhang, R. van der Weegen, L. Ruiz, C. Li, S. Keten,
B. A. Helms and T. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 15296.
23 MD simulations have indicated that pore formation might be difficult.
24 K. Kano and J. H. Fendler, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1978, 509, 289.
25 N. R. Clement and J. M. Gould, Biochemistry, 1981, 20, 1534.
27 The steady increase in fluorescence is preceded by an initial rapid
increase due to deprotonation of the dye on the external vesicle surface.
28 N. Madhavan, E. C. Robert and M. S. Gin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2005, 44, 7584.
29 Deconvoluted using the CDNN 2.1 software.
30 The structure was solved in the space group P21 with an R factor of
8.36%. The unit cell parameters are a = 12.639 (2)0, b = 10.4737(16)0,
c = 18.814(3) Å and b = 90.117(1). Z = 20, V = 2490.54(68) Å3. CCDC
923387 contains crystallographic data for peptide 7.
31 Geometry optimization was done using the PC SPARTAN PRO Semi-
empirical program 6.0.6.
Fig. 4 Equilibrium geometry of peptide 1 dimer (a) front view; (b) top view;
(c) schematic representation of the ion channel derived from peptide 1.
c
7342 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 7340--7342
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013