and their esters B that proceed in the presence of copper and
palladium catalysts to furnish quaternary carbon centers,5
and (c) the construction of oxygenꢀacyl bonds through
the gold-catalyzed cyclization of (Z)-enynols C1 followed
by the oxidative cleavage of the exomethylene moiety,6 and
also through the palladium- or rhodium-catalyzed addition
of organoboron compounds to 4-hydroxy-2-alkynoates C2
followed by lactonization.7 In addition, the cyclization of
homopropargyl alcohols C3 having a silyl or bromo group
at the acetylene terminus has been successfully executed
using palladium, mercury, and gold catalysts, although with
the production of R,β-saturated-γ-lactones.8
group at the acetylene terminus undergo rearrangement
more rapidly than those with alkyl and aryl groups. This is
attributed to the inherent high reactivity of the phenoxy-
ethynyl moiety, which accelerates the 1,3-shift of the
hydroxyl groups to the adjacent position of the phenoxy
group.12 It was anticipated that the use of phenoxyethynyl
groups would render the alkyne susceptible to attack even
by bulky nucleophiles in the intramolecular cyclization.
Herein, we report the highly efficient AgOTf-catalyzed
intramolecular cyclization of phenoxyethynyl diols 3
having tertiary alcohol moieties under mild conditions to
afford γ,γ-disubstituted R,β-unsaturated-γ-lactones 4 in
good to excellent yields. Additionally, N-bromosuccinimide
(NBS) promoted a similar cyclization of 3 to give the
corresponding R-bromo derivatives 9.
Table 1. Screening of Reaction Conditions for the Cyclization of
3a to 4a
Figure 1. Reported Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Intramolecular
Lactone Formation.
yield of
4a (%)b
entry
catalyst
time (h)
1a
2
none
6
74
79
(Ph3P)AuCl, AgOTf
(0.5 mol % each)
2.5
Intermolecular lactonizations have also utilized the
ruthenium- or palladium-catalyzed cycloaddition of alle-
nyl alcohols and ketones with carbon monoxide.9 The
palladium-catalyzed γ-arylation of R-angelicalactone has
also been reported.10 However, owing to their inherent
steric hindrance, the application of these methods to the
syntheses of γ,γ-disubstituted R,β-unsaturated-γ-lactones
frequently requires a high catalyst loading, furnishes mod-
erate yields, has a narrow substrate scope, and calls for
harsh reaction conditions involving elevated temperatures
or a prolonged reaction time.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
AgOTf (0.5 mol %)
AgNTf2 (0.5 mol %)
Ag3PO4 (0.5 mol %)
CF3CO2H (10 mol %)
CF3SO3H (10 mol %)
Me3SiOTf (10 mol %)
PhOH (10 mol %)
0.5
1
93
90
4.5
2
45
78
34
1.5
2.5
3
52
no reaction
a The reaction was conducted under reflux. b Isolated yield.
Our ongoing research has focused on the transition-
metal-catalyzed rearrangements of propargyl alcohols into
R,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds.11 These studies
have revealed that propargyl alcohols having a phenoxy
Lithium phenoxyacetylide, generated in situ from
dichlorovinyl phenyl ether 213 and n-BuLi, reacted with
the hydroxyketone 1a in Et2O to afford the corresponding
diol 3a in 93% yield. Using 3a as a substrate, the reaction
conditionsfor the lactonization were evaluatedasshown in
Table 1. MaGee et al. reported that the intramolecular
lactonization of similar substrates, i.e., ethoxyethynyl
diols, required a temperature of 150 °C, which suggested
(5) (a) Ma, S.; Yu, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1775–1778.
(b) Ma, S.; Wu, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4075–4077.
(6) Liu, Y.; Song, F.; Guo, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11332–
11333.
(7) (a) Alfonsi, M.; Arcadi, A.; Chiarini, M.; Marinelli, F. J. Org.
Chem. 2007, 72, 9510–9517. (b) Oh, C. H.; Park, S. J.; Ryu, J. H.; Gupta,
A. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 7039–7042.
(12) (a) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Rudolph, M.; Huck, J.; Frey, W.; Bats,
ꢀ
J. W.; Hamzic, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5848–5852. For
(8) (a) Reddy, M. S.; Kumar, Y. K.; Thirupathi, N. Org. Lett. 2012,
other examples of efficient conversions with alkynyl ethers or ynamides
in transition metal catalysis, see: (b) Rettenmeier, E.; Schuster, A. M.;
Rudolph, M.; Rominger, F.; Gade, C. A.; Hashmi, A. S. K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 5880–5884. (c) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Rudolph, M.;
Bats, J. W.; Frey, W.; Rominger, F.; Oeser, T. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14,
6672–6678. (d) Istrate, F. M.; Buzas, A. K.; Jurberg, I. D.; Odabachian,
Y.; Gagosz, F. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 925–928. (e) Hashmi, A. S. K.;
ꢀ
ꢁ
14, 824–827. (b) Compain, P.; Gore, J.; Vatele, J.-M. Tetrahedron 1996,
52, 10405–10416.
(9) (a) Kang, S.-K.; Kim, K.-J.; Hong, Y.-T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 1584–1586. (b) Yoneda, E.; Kaneko, T.; Zhang, S.-W.;
Onitsuka, K.; Takahashi, S. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 441–443. (c) Cowell,
A.; Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4193–4198.
(10) Hyde, A. M.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2663–2666.
(11) (a) Egi, M.; Umemura, M.; Kawai, T.; Akai, S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12197–12200. (b) Egi, M.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Fujiwara,
N.; Akai, S. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1867–1870.
ꢀ
Salathe, R.; Frey, W. Synlett 2007, 1763–1766. (f) Couty, S.; Meyer, C.;
Cossy, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6726–6730. (g) Zhang, L.;
Kozmin, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11806–11807.
(13) Geary, L. M.; Hultin, P. G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 5563–5573.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX