2
Tetrahedron Letters
Scheme 1. Synthetic plan for the preparation of compound 1 from D-(–)-
ribose based on the steps published in the literature. Reagents and
conditions: i. (a) Br2, NaHCO3, H2O, 0 °C, 110 min, (b) NaHSO3, 0 °C; ii.
benzalacetone, RhH(PPh3)4 (cat.), anhydrous DMF, 40 °C, under argon,
1.5 h, 99%; iii. anhydrous acetone, 2,2-dimethoxypropane, conc. H2SO4
(cat.), r.t., 50 min, 73% from D-(–)-ribose, (b) Ag2CO3, r.t.; iv. (a) PPh3,
NBS, CH2Cl2, 10–25 °C, 2.5 h, (b) BaCO3, reflux, 15 min, 80%; v. (a)
DIBAL-H, anhydrous PhMe or anhydrous THF, –80 °C, 30 min, under
argon, (b) MeOH, r.t., 30 min, 95%; vi. BnONH3 Cl-, pyridine, CH2Cl2,
H2O, reflux, 18 h; 95%; vii. (a) (n-Bu)3SnH, AIBN (cat.), PhMe, reflux,
under argon, 6 h, (b) Et2O, 15% KF aq, overnight, 75%.
+
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: i. (a) acetone, conc. H2SO4 (cat.), r.t.,
18 h, (b) PPh3, NBS, DMF, 0 °C to r.t., 20 h, 28% for 5 from D-(–)-ribose,
38% for 12 from L-(+)-ribose, 18% for 13 from D-(–)-lyxose; ii.
+
BnONH3 Cl-, pyridine, CH2Cl2, H2O, reflux, 18 h, 93% for 7 from 5, 82%
In our attempts to make the synthesis of compound 1 more
convenient, we eliminated the initial protection of the free
anomeric hydroxyl group of D-(–)-ribose. We converted the
starting aldopentose into bromide 5 in two steps, without
purification of the intermediate 6. The first stage was the
conversion of D-(–)-ribose into its 2,3-O-isopropylidene
derivative 6.16 The crude acetonide 6 was then treated with
for 14 from 12, 93% for 15 from 13; iii. (a) (n-Bu)3SnH, ABCN (cat.),
PhMe, reflux, argon, 6 h, (b) Et2O, 20% KF aq, 12 h, 77% for 1 from 7,
71% for 8 from 14, 68% for 9 from 15.
Table 1.
Orthogonally protected aminocyclopentitols 1, 8 and 9 obtained from
aldopentoses.
PPh3
and
N-bromosuccinimide
(NBS)
in
N,N-
Final orthogonally
Overall yield
Starting aldopentose
protected
dimethylformamide (DMF) to give the bromide 5 in 28% yield
from D-(–)-ribose, after purification by flash column
chromatography. The bromide was converted into the oxime 7
using a literature procedure,15 in 93% yield. For the free-radical
carbocyclization of compound 7 into orthogonally protected
aminocyclopentitol 1, the radical initiator 2,2-azobis(2-
methylpropionitrile) (AIBN) as used in the literature
procedure,8 was replaced with the less hazardous 1,1-
azobis(cyclohexanecarbonitrile) (ABCN). The yield of this
carbocyclization step was 77% (Scheme 2). The overall yield
for the preparation of compound 1 from D-(–)-ribose using this
three-step procedure was 20% (Table 1), while the calculated
overall yield of the six-step procedure reported in the literature
was 40% (Scheme 1).
(%)b
aminocyclopentitol
20
22
11
We were thus able to make the synthesis of compound 1
more convenient by reducing the number of steps from six to
three, and by avoiding reactions that required the use of some
hazardous reagents. To confirm the general applicability of our
procedure, we converted L-(+)-ribose into compound 8, in 22%
overall yield, and D-(–)-lyxose into compound 9, in 11% yield,
bIsolated yield of pure product
As the configurations at C1, C2 and C3 of compounds 1, 8
and 9 are the same as in the corresponding starting
aldopentose, we were able to determine the configuration at C4
of these compounds using NOESY spectroscopy. In
compounds 1 and 8, where the hydroxyl group and the
benzylhydroxylamino group are in the trans configuration,
proton H1 correlates more intensely with one of the protons
H5, while proton H4 correlates more intensely with the other
H5 proton (Figure 2). In compound 9, where the hydroxyl
group and the benzylhydroxylamino group are in cis
thus
obtaining
two
additional
stereoisomeric
aminocyclopentitols (Scheme 2, Table 1).