CLUSTER
Pentafluorophenyl Triazolium Carbenes
1231
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 4298. (e) Jacobsen, C. B.;
C6F5
MeOOC
Albrecht, L.; Udmark, J.; Jørgensen, K. A. Org. Lett. 2012,
14, 5526. (f) Liu, Y.; Nappi, M.; Escudero-Adán, E. C.;
Melchiorre, P. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1310. (g) Grossmann, A.;
Enders, D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 314.
N
N
K2CO3
N
7
8
N
N
N
C6F5
N
O
(7) Zhao, X.; DiRocco, D. A.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011,
133, 12466.
E
Boc
F
(8) For representative examples, see: (a) Enders, D.;
Grossmann, A.; Fronert, J.; Raabe, G. Chem. Commun.
2010, 46, 6282. (b) Rong, Z.-Q.; Jia, M.-Q.; You, S.-L. Org.
Lett. 2011, 13, 4080. (c) Jia, M.-Q.; You, S.-L. ACS Catal.
2013, 3, 622.
F
N
N
N
N
(9) Typical Experimental Procedure for Decomposition of 1:
In a 5-mL vial were subsequently added triazolium salt 1
(0.2 mmol), KOAc (0.2 mmol) and MeOH (3 mL). The
solution was stirred under argon at 23 °C for 16 h, and then
concentrated. The resulting residue was purified by column
chromatography on silica gel [eluent: hexanes–EtOAc (1:1)
then 100% EtOAc then 100% MeOH] to give 2 and 3. The
salt 3 can be further purified by trituration with EtOAc.
Compound 2: yellow solid. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ
= 8.26 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.30 (br s, 4 H), 7.00 (br s, 0.5
H), 6.31 (br s, 0.5 H), 4.71–4.74 (m, 1 H), 4.63 (t, J = 4.7 Hz,
1 H), 4.21–4.38 (m, 2 H), 3.26 (dd, J = 16.9, 5.1 Hz, 1 H),
3.12 (d, J = 16.9 Hz, 1 H). 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3):
δ = 163.8, 158.5, 139.3, 128.7, 128.4, 127.4, 125.3, 123.3,
64.3, 57.2, 37.9, 29.3. 19F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –
142.8 (s, 0.5 F), –143.2 (s, 0.5 F), –145.8 (d, J = 19.8 Hz, 1
F), –152.6 (t, J = 21.4 Hz, 0.5 F), –153.4 (t, J = 21.4 Hz, 0.5
F), –160.8 (t, J = 19.5 Hz, 1 F), –161.5 (s, 1 F). LRMS (ES+):
m/z [M]+ calcd for C18H12F5N3O2: 397.09; found: 398.10.
Compound 3: slightly yellow solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): δ = 13.23 (s, 1 H), 7.71 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.23–
7.33 (m, 3 H), 6.50 (br s, 1 H), 4.98–5.05 (m, 3 H), 3.32 (dd,
J = 4.2, 17.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.19 (d, J = 17.1 Hz, 1 H). 13C{1H}
NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 150.6, 148.1 (br), 139.8,
F
F
N
N
base
MeOOC
9
MeOOC
F
F
F
O
O
N
N
F
F
F
F
Boc
Boc
G
F
Scheme 5 Proposed mechanistic pathway
gether, these results shed light on potential pathways for
catalyst decomposition and may lead to the design of new,
more efficient catalysts for NHC-mediated transforma-
tions.
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to NIGMS (GM 72586) for generous support of this
research. T.R. thanks Amgen and Roche for support. We thank
Donald Gauthier and Greg Hughes (Merck) for a generous gift of
aminoindanol.
134.7, 129.7, 128.0, 125.4, 124.2, 77.5, 62.8, 60.3, 37.5. 19
F
Supporting Information for this article is available online at
NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –143.7 (d, J = 18.4 Hz, 2 F),
–145.7 (t, J = 21.8 Hz, 1 F), –157.9 to –158.1 (m, 2 F).
HRMS (ESI): m/z [M – OH]+ calcd for C18H11F5N3O:
380.0817; found: 380.0816.
m
iotSrat
ungIifoop
r
t
References and Notes
(10) Salt 3 proved difficult to purify to analytically pure material,
resulting in significant loss of material. Thus, we do not
report an isolated yield here.
(1) (a) Moore, J. L.; Rovis, T. Top. Curr. Chem. 2010, 291, 77.
(b) Vora, H. U.; Rovis, T. Aldrichimica Acta 2011, 44, 3.
(c) Bugaut, X.; Glorius, F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3511.
(2) (a) Rovis, T. Chem. Lett. 2008, 37, 2. (b) Mahatthananchai,
J.; Bode, J. W. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 192. (c) Schedler, M.;
Fröhlich, R.; Daniliuc, C.-G.; Glorius, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2012, 4164.
(3) Kerr, M. S.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8876.
(4) (a) Liu, Q.; Perreault, S.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 14066. (b) Liu, Q.; Rovis, T. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2856.
(c) DiRocco, D. A.; Oberg, K. M.; Dalton, D. M.; Rovis, T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10872. (d) DiRocco, D. A.;
Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10402. (e) Sánchez-
Larios, E.; Thai, K.; Bilodeau, F.; Gravel, M. Org. Lett.
2011, 13, 4942.
(5) For representative examples, see: (a) Reynolds, N. T.;
Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16406. (b) Vora, H.
U.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13796. (c) Vora,
H. U.; Moncecchi, J. R.; Epstein, O.; Rovis, T. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 73, 9727. (d) Vora, H. U.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 2860.
(6) For representative examples, see: (a) Lathrop, S. P.; Rovis,
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13628. (b) Filloux, C. M.;
Lathrop, S. P.; Rovis, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010,
107, 20666. (c) Ozboya, K. E.; Rovis, T. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2,
1835. (d) Enders, D.; Grossmann, A.; Huang, H.; Raabe, G.
(11) Compound 4: orange solid. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ
= 7.35 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.13–7.17 (m, 1 H), 6.71 (d, J =
7.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.01 (t, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.05–5.17 (m, 3 H),
3.43 (dd, J = 17.0, 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.34 (d, J = 17.0 Hz, 1 H),
1.86–1.62 (br s, 2 H from H2O). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3): δ = 150.7, 139.7, 134.4, 130.3, 128.6, 126.0, 123.8,
98.7, 77.8, 62.9, 62.8, 60.1, 36.9. 19F NMR (376 MHz,
CDCl3): δ = –142.3 to –142.4 (m, 1 F), –144.1 (tt, J = 21.6,
4.4 Hz, 1 F), –144.2 to –144.3 (m, 1 F), –144.6 to –144.7 (m,
1 F), –147.3 to –147.4 (m, 1 F), –156.5 (td, J = 21.8, 6.8 Hz,
1 F), –156.8 (td, J = 21.8, 6.8 Hz, 1 F), –163.2 (t, J = 23.0
Hz, 1 F), –163.5 (t, J = 23.0 Hz, 1 F). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M
+ H]+ calcd for C24H11F9N3O2: 544.0708; found: 544.0712.
(12) This structure is somewhat disordered with what appears to
be partial protonation of the phenolic oxygen. There is a
corresponding counterion, also disordered, whose identity
could not be determined (hydroxide vs. fluoride). Both
structures (4 and 9) have been submitted to the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre as CCDC 935024 and CCDC
935025.
(13) (a) Enders, D.; Breuer, K.; Raabe, G.; Runsink, J.; Teles, J.
H.; Melder, J.-P.; Ebel, K.; Brode, S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
1995, 34, 1021. (b) Enders, D.; Breuer, K.; Kallfass, U.;
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Synlett 2013, 24, 1229–1232