10.1002/cphc.201701182
ChemPhysChem
COMMUNICATION
[22]
shifted.
Both the pristine dyad, (C60)-CF2, and the malonate
Graphite rods were vaporized in an arc-discharge reactor where
Teflon tubes have been added. The arc-discharge took place
under 80 mbar of constant helium flow and a dc current of 500
amps. The carbon soot was Soxhlet extracted with toluene. Bingel
reaction: 0.05 mg of the (C60)2-(CF2) were dissolved in 0.1 ml of
CS2. Solutions of 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) and
diethyl bromomalonate were prepared accordingly: 0.005 ml of
DBU in 4.995 ml toluene and 0.0057 ml diethyl malonate in 4.994
ml toluene. 0.005 ml of the DBU solution and 0.005 ml of the
malonate solution were added in the fullerene solution. Further
0.01 and 0.0114 ml of the DBU and malonate solutions were
added, the same after 2 hours, and 0.02+0.02 ml were finally
added after 41/2 hours. A C60 monomer functionalized with the
same malonate unit was synthesized through 1:1:1 C60: DBU:
bromomalonate molar ratio.
(C60)-(CF2)2, exhibit
a biexponential decay time resolved
fluorescence with one long and one short lifetime component (Fig.
4b). The lifetimes derived from the bi exponential decays are
0.53;2.85 ns for 420 nm, 0.73;3.24 ns for 440 nm, 0.84;3.58 ns;
for 460 nm, 1;4 ns for 480 nm.
a-I)
a-II)
700
600
500
400
0.005900
0.005287
0.004675
0.004063
0.003450
0.002837
0.002225
0.001613
1.000E-03
700
600
500
400
9.700
8.587
7.475
6.362
5.250
4.137
3.025
1.912
0.8000
1200 1225 1250 1275 1300
Emission (nm)
1200 1225 1250 1275 1300
Emission (nm)
420 nm
440 nm
460 nm
480 nm
500 nm
520 nm
420 nm
440 nm
460 nm
480 nm
Mono exp.
Bi exp
Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge EPSRC for
grant support (EP/K030108/1).
Supporting information section: HPLC curves, Raman/FTIR
spectra, 19F/13C NMR, photosensitization studies are available
free of charge via the internet.
b-I)
b-II)
6
9
12
15
4
6
8
10
ns
12
14
ns
Keywords: Fullerene dyads • Fluorescence • Photosensitization
References
1.
2.
3.
J.L.Segura, N.Martin. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2000, 29, 13
R.Taylor, M.P.Barrow, T. Drewello, Chem. Commun. 1998, 2497
K.Komatsu, G.W.Wang, Y.Murata, T.Tanaka, K.Fujiwara J.Org.Chem.
1998, 63, 9358-9366
4.
5.
6.
M.A. Lebedeva, T.W. Chamberlain, E. S.Davies et al Beilstein J. Org.
Chem. 2014, 10, 332–343
Figure 4. a) NIR PL for the (I) Bingel (C60)2-(CF2) (0.03 mg/ml in
CS2) and (II) the (C60)2-(CF2)2. b) Time resolved fluorescence
lifetime measurements. (I) Bingel (C60)2-(CF2) and (II) (C60)2-CF2.
The fitting curves are shown in yellow lines. c) the illuminations of
the samples with 400 nm light. From left to right: C60, (C60)2-CF2,
(C60)2-(CF2)2, Bingel (C60)2-(CF2)2.
A.Gromov, S.Lebedkin, S.Ballenweg, A.G. Avent, R.Taylor,
W.Kratschmer. Chem. Commun. 1997, 209
J.Zhang, K.Porfyrakis, J.J.L.Morton, M.R.Sambrook, J.Harmer, L.Xiao, A.
Ardavan, G.A.D. Briggs. J.Phys.Chem.C.Lett. 2008, 112, 2802-2804
S.Erten-Ela, C.Villegas, J.L.Delgado et al. Science, 1996, 271, 1833
Y. Rio, D. Sanchez-Garcıa, W. Seitz, T. Torres, J. L. Sessler, D. M. Guldi.
Chem.Eur. J. 2009, 15, 3956;
7.
8.
In summary, two novel C60 dyads bridged with the electron
withdrawing -CF2- can be synthesized through an arc-discharge
procedure. The structure of the dimers has been determined by
19F NMR, 13C NMR, mass spec and Raman/FTIR. HPLC analysis,
shows that the addition of Teflon alters the thermodynamics of the
systems, suppresses specific classes of fullerenes and stabilizes
these unusual dyads. Detailed fluorescence studies indicated the
similarity of their optical transitions compared to pristine and
malonate C60, resulting in reduced intensity of the singlet oxygen
generation compared to conventional fullerenes. Malonate
derivatives exhibited similar optical properties albeit with a more
pronounced singlet oxygen sensitization. These materials
represent a new class of carbon nanostructures that combine the
versatile surface functionality of fullerenes with the
photoluminescence properties of carbogenic dots.
9.
U. Giovanella, C. Botta, F. Galeotti, B. Vercelli, S. Battiato, M. Pasini. J.
Mater. Chem. C. 2013, 1, 5322–5329
10. Z.Wang, Y.Nakanishi, S.Noda, H.Niwa, J.Zhang, R.Kitaura, H.Shinohara.
Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2013, 52, 11770
11. I.E. Kareev, I.V. Kuvychko, S.F. Lebedkin et al. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 2005,
127, 8362-8375
12. G-W.Wnag, K.Komatsu, Y.Murata, M.Shiro. Nature 1997, 387, 583.
13. H.Kuzmany, R.Pfeiffer, M.Hulman, C.Kramberger. Phil.Trans.R.Soc.Lond.
A. 2004, 362, 2375
14. Z.Wang, Y.Nakanishi, S.Noda, K.Akiyama, H.Shinohara. J.Phys.Chem.C.
2012, 116, 25563-25567
15. V Filidou, S Simmons, SD. Karlen, F Giustino, HL. Anderson, JJ.L. Morton.
Nat.Phys. 2012, 8, 596
16. M.J.Krysmann, A.Kelarakis, P.Dallas, E.P.Giannelis. J.Am.Chem.Soc.
2012, 134, 747
17. W.Zhou, J.Zhuang, W.Li, C.Hu, B.Lei, Y.Liu. J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5,
8014--8021
18. C.K.Chua, Z.Sofer, P.Simek, O.Jankovsky, K.Klımova, S. Bakardjieva,
S.H.Kuckova, M.Pumera ACS Nano 2015, 9, 2548
19. N.Fuyuno, D.Kozawa, Y.Miyauchi, S. et al. Adv.Optical Mater. 2014, 2,
983-989
Experimental Section
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.