ChemComm
Communication
channels, which further self-assemble through lateral, intermole-
cular H-bonding interactions into a 3D microporous architecture.
To the best of our knowledge, this arrangement, reinforced by
extensive C–HꢂꢂꢂO hydrogen-bonding networks, represents the first
example of a homochiral, molecular organic porous crystal. In
solution, the enantiopure macrocycles exhibit remarkably intense
Cotton effects. We anticipate that the alleno-acetylenic macrocycle
3 will serve as an excellent platform for further funtionalisation
aimed at further stabilizing the discotic-type stacking in solution.
Such architectures may pave the way to novel, homochiral
porous organic materials with large channels that can be used,
for example, to encapsulate guests and facilitate their reactions
in an enantioselective manner.
Fig. 3 ECD spectra of enantiopure monomers (2), dimers (10), and tetrameric
macrocycles (11 and 3) measured in MeCN at 25 1C.
and participate in two O–Hꢂ ꢂ ꢂCl interactions with an average
Oꢂ ꢂ ꢂCl distance of 2.8 Å (Fig. S8b, ESI†). As a result of this
extended H-bonding network, the columnar stacks self-assem-
ble further into a 3D microporous architecture (Fig. 2c; see also
Fig. S8c, ESI†)14 that gives rise to contiguous, remarkably large
solvent channels in the crystal (Fig. S9, ESI†).15 The tetrameric
macrocycle (P)4-3 also undergoes hydrogen-bond-driven self-
assembly in solution, as suggested by the characteristic downfield
This work was supported by the ERC Advanced Grant No.
246637 (‘‘OPTELOMAC’’). We thank Dr. Pablo Rivera-Fuentes
for comments on the manuscript.
Notes and references
1 For selected reviews on SPMs, see: (a) C. Grave and A. D. Schlu¨ter,
¨
Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 3075; (b) S. Hoger, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004,
10, 1320; (c) W. Zhang and J. S. Moore, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006,
45, 4416; (d) M. Iyoda, J. Yamakawa and M. J. Rahman, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 10522.
1
shift of the OH protons in the H NMR spectra in CDCl3 upon
raising the concentration (Fig. S5 and S6, ESI†). The structure of
these assemblies in solution is under further investigation.
¨
2 For selected examples, see: (a) A. Bahr, A. S. Droz, M. Pu¨ntener,
U. Neidlein, S. Anderson, P. Seiler and F. Diederich, Helv.
Chim. Acta, 1998, 81, 1931; (b) T. Kawase, T. Nakamura,
K. Utsumi, K. Matsumoto, H. Kurata and M. Oda, Chem.–Asian J.,
2008, 3, 573; (c) C. Coluccini, D. Dondi, M. Caricato, A. Taglietti,
M. Boiocchi and D. Pasini, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 1640.
3 S. J. Lee and W. Lin, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 521.
ECD spectroscopy was finally employed to probe the chiroptical
properties of the enantiopure macrocycles 11 and 3 (Fig. 3; see also
Fig. S10–S15, ESI†). In MeCN, both macrocycles show intense
Cotton effects centred at 257 (De = ꢀ415 Mꢁ1 cmꢁ1, 11) and
254 nm (De = ꢀ375 Mꢁ1 cmꢁ1, 3). While these values remain very
large, they are reduced with respect to the tetrameric macrocycle
peripheꢁra1lly garnered by eight tert-butyl groups (253 nm, De =
ꢀ790 M cmꢁ1 in n-hexane) (Fig. S16, ESI†).4b This reduced
intensity of the Cotton effects correlates with a reduction in the
molar extinction coefficients, presumably induced by the phe-
nolic substituents, which also increase the conformational
flexibility of the macrocycle (Fig. S16–S18, ESI†).4d Despite the
reduction in Cotton effects, the Demax-values of the tetrameric
macrocycles (P)4-3 and (M)4-3 are still approximately 42 times
larger than those of the corresponding monomers (P)-2 and
(M)-2 and roughly 8 times higher than those of the dimers
(P,P)-10 and (M,M)-10. Similar conclusions can be drawn for the
corresponding macrocycles (P)4-11 and (M)4-11 (Fig. 3; see also
Fig. S10–S13, ESI†). Also, consistent with our previous studies,
both tetrameric macrocycles display a Cotton effect centred
between 305 and 311 nm, which splits into three maxima due to
vibronic coupling.4b,c Chiral amplification as a result of self-
assembly was not observed in solution in either a polar solvent
(i.e. MeCN) or a more appropriate, apolar solvent such as
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane in the concentration range between
1 ꢃ 10ꢁ4 and 1 ꢃ 10ꢁ5 M (Fig. S19, ESI†).
´
4 (a) S. Odermatt, J. L. Alonso-Gomez, P. Seiler, M. M. Cid and
F. Diederich, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 5074; (b) J. L. Alonso-
´
Gomez, P. Rivera-Fuentes, N. Harada, N. Berova and F. Diederich, Angew.
´
Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 5545; (c) P. Rivera-Fuentes, J. L. Alonso-Gomez,
A. G. Petrovic, P. Seiler, F. Santoro, N. Harada, N. Berova, H. S. Rzepa and
F. Diederich, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 9796; (d) P. Rivera-Fuentes,
B. Nieto-Ortega, W. B. Schweizer, J. T. L. Navarrete, J. Casado and
F. Diederich, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 3876.
5 T. Kawase, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 7334.
6 P. Rivera-Fuentes and F. Diederich, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012,
51, 2818.
`
7 M. Leclere and A. G. Fallis, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 568.
´
´
8 (a) J. L. Alonso-Gomez, A. Navarro-Vazquez and M. M. Cid,
´
Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 6495; (b) I. R. Lahoz, A. Navarro-Vazquez,
´
A. L. Llamas-Saiz, J. L. Alonso-Gomez and M. M. Cid, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2012, 18, 13836.
9 K. Campbell and R. R. Tykwinski, in Carbon-Rich Compounds:
From Molecules to Materials, ed. M. M. Haley and R. R. Tykwinski,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006, ch. 6, pp. 229–294.
10 D. Venkataraman, S. Lee, J. Zhang and J. S. Moore, Nature, 1994,
371, 591.
11 M. K. J. ter Wiel, S. Odermatt, P. Schanen, P. Seiler and F. Diederich,
Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2007, 3449.
12 These deprotection steps could be performed interchangeably without
showing any noticable difference in the final yield of (ꢀ)-2.
13 F. R. van Heerden, J. J. van Zyl, G. J. H. Rall, E. V. Brandt and
D. G. Roux, Tetrahedron Lett., 1978, 661.
14 L. J. Barbour, Chem. Commun., 2006, 1163.
15 For recent examples of channel structures based on SPMs, see:
(a) K. Ono, K. Tsukamoto, R. Hosokawa, M. Kato, M. Suganuma,
M. Tomura, K. Sako, K. Taga and K. Saito, Nano Lett., 2009, 9, 122;
(b) M. Fritzsche, A. Bohle, D. Dudenko, U. Baumeister, D. Sebastiani,
In summary, the bisphenol-substituted DEA derivatives (P)- and
(M)-2 have been prepared in enantiomerically pure form and further
reacted to afford the tetrameric macrocycles (P)4- and (M)4-3 bearing
eight lateral phenolic groups around the central alleno-acetylenic
all-carbon core, all available for H-bonding interactions. Thus,
consistent with our initial objectives, X-ray crystallography
revealed that (P)4-3 stacks in pillars in the solid state to form
¨
G. Richardt, H. W. Spiess, M. R. Hansen and S. Hoger, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 3030; (c) A. D. Finke, D. E. Gross, A. Han and
J. S. Moore, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 14063; (d) X. Zhou, G. Liu,
K. Yamato, Y. Shen, R. Cheng, X. Wei, W. Bai, Y. Gao, H. Li, Y. Liu,
F. Liu, D. M. Czajkowsky, J. Wang, M. J. Dabney, Z. Cai, J. Hu,
F. V. Bright, L. He, X. C. Zeng, Z. Shao and B. Gong, Nat. Commun.,
2012, 3, 949.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun.