one-flask metathesis sequence has recently been reported
by us,13 and a related ring-opening of benzooxepines14 and
benzoazepines15 obtained through RCM was reported by
Ramachary et al.
We started our investigation into a stereoselective synthe-
sis of dienyl phosphonates with the preparation of RCM
precursor 12a by adapting a sequence previously reported
by Virieux et al.16 To this end, allyl alcohol 10a was treated
with allyl chloro phosphonate 11 under slightly modified
conditions to give the required precursor 12a in 79% yield
as a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers. We chose the second-
generation catalyst A17 to accomplish the cyclization of
12a, because we suspected from previous experience with
the RCM of substituted allyl butenoates that this reaction
would most likely proceed slowly and in poor yield with
first-generation catalysts, even if comparatively high cata-
lyst loadings were used.18 However, it should be noted that
good yields had previously been reported for the RCM of
similar allyl phosphonates16,19,20 with sterically less de-
manding allylic substituents, using the first-generation
Grubbs catalyst.21 We found that 12a underwent RCM
Figure 1. Drugs and medicinal chemistry test substances con-
taining phosphonate units.
1
to 13a quantitatively as judged from the H NMR spec-
tethered ring-closing metathesis (RCM)ꢀring-opening re-
trum of the crude mixture within one hour by using a
comparatively low catalyst loading of 1 mol % of A and a
conveniently manageable initial substrate concentration
of 0.1 M in toluene at slightly elevated temperature. The
cyclic phosphonate 13a was isolated in 74% yield as a 1:1
mixture of diastereomers, indicating that RCM of both
diastereomers of 12a proceeds at a similar rate under these
metathesis conditions. In the next step, the projected one-
flask RCMꢀring-opening sequence was applied to pre-
cursor 12a by adding the base NaH to the reaction mixture
upon completion of the metathesis step. Monitoring the
reaction by TLC revealed that under these conditions the
intermediate RCM product 13a was completely consumed
after 2 h, and upon aqueous acidic workup the hemi-
phosphonate 14a was isolated as a single (1Z,3E)-diaster-
eomer in good yield. Similarly, the alkyl-substituted phos-
phonates 14b,c could be isolated as single diastereomers in
comparable yields (Scheme 2).
action following the general sequence outlined in Scheme 1.
Scheme 1. General Principle of Tethered RCMꢀRing-Opening
Sequences
In these reactions, RCM substrates of the general struc-
ture 6 comprising an electron-withdrawing functional
group Y and an acidic R-H atom are first subjected to
RCM, followed by in situ deprotonation of 7 and a base-
induced ring-opening of intermediate 8. After aqueous
workup, diene 9 results. In contrast to other tethered
RCM reactions,7,8 the XꢀY bond remains intact, but
the double bond formed during RCM is shifted and an
additional functionality, i.e., a second double bond, is
created. Precedence for the base-induced stereospecific
ring-opening of endocyclic alkenes of the general structure
7 exists for the conversion of R,β-unsaturated-δ-lactones
into (2Z,4E)-dienoic acids.9ꢀ12 The implementation of
this particular base-induced ring-opening reaction in a
At this stage we realized that the chromatographic
purification of the ring-opening products 14 was very
laborious, due to their high polarity. In addition, complex
(13) Schmidt, B.; Kunz, O. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 1008–1018.
(14) Ramachary, D. B.; Narayana, V. V.; Ramakumar, K. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 3907–3911.
(15) Ramachary, D. B.; Narayana, V. V. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011,
3514–3522.
(16) Fourgeaud, P.; Midrier, C.; Vors, J.-P.; Volle, J.-N.; Pirat, J.-L.;
Virieux, D. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 758–764.
(17) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999,
1, 953–956.
(7) Evans, P. A.; Murthy, V. S. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6768–6769.
(8) Venukadasula, P. K. M.; Chegondi, R.; Suryn, G. M.; Hanson,
P. R. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2634–2637.
(18) Schmidt, B.; Kunz, O. Synlett 2012, 23, 851–854.
(19) McReynolds, M. D.; Dougherty, J. M.; Hanson, P. R. Chem.
Rev. 2004, 104, 2239–2258.
(9) Cardillo, G.; Orena, M.; Sandri, S. Tetrahedron 1976, 32, 107–108.
(10) Corey, E. J.; Schmidt, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20, 2317–2320.
(11) Roush, W. R.; Spada, A. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 3773–
3776.
(12) Ciabatti, R.;Maffioli, S. I.;Panzone, G.;Canavesi, A.;Michelucci,
E.; Tiseni, P. S.; Marzorati, E.; Checchia, A.; Giannone, M.; Jabes, D.;
(20) (a) Hanson, P. R.; Stoinova, D. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
3939–3942. (b) Stoianova, D. S.; Whitehead, A.; Hanson, P. R. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 5880–5889. (c) Zhang, H.; Tsukuhara, R.; Tigyi, G.;
Prestwich, G. D. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6061–6066. (d) Bravo-Altamirano,
K.; Abrunhosa-Thomas, I.; Montchamp, J.-L. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73,
2292–2301.
ꢀ
Romano, G.; Brunati, C.; Candiani, G.; Castiglione, F. J. Med. Chem.
(21) Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 100–110.
2007, 50, 3077–3085.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 17, 2013
4471