were isolated, and our studies indicate that this forms by
hydrolysis of the NH imine protodepalladation product.15
We have undertaken an assessment of the scope of the
aryl moiety to determine its effects upon product selection
(Scheme 2).16 A range of electron-rich and -poor aryl
groups gave good selectivity for the target dihydropyrroles
10dÀi (10:1 to >20:1 vs 11dÀi).17 In all cases, the major
E-alkene isomer was isolated easily in moderate to good
yield (45À64%). For 10i, the crude reaction mixture was
not readily analyzed by 1H NMR and so in situ selectivities
have not been determined.
some alkene isomerization to the corresponding styrenyl
derivative was observed (6:1 regioisomer ratio).19 As before,
product ratios were largely constant over the time frame of
the reaction, which supports kinetic product selection.
Scheme 4
Scheme 3. Cyclizations Generating 1,2-Dialkylated Alkenes
In the cyclizations outlined in Scheme 3, the R2 group
seemingly provides no significant activation of CÀHa
(vs CÀHb) for β-hydride elimination (see Scheme 1c).
We have carried out an assay of ligand effects (PPh3 vs
P(4-CF3C6H4)3 vs P(3,5-(CF3)2C6H3)3) on the cyclization
of 9k to uncover the origins of product selection in these
cases (Scheme 4a). As expected, overall cyclization effi-
ciency improves as the ligand becomes more electron
deficient. However, both PPh3 and P(4-CF3C6H4)3 af-
forded predominantly the undesired pyrrole 11k.20 These
data indicate that P(3,5-(CF3)2C6H3)3 is able to enforce
selective β-hydride elimination because of the steric effects
of the meta-CF3 substituents (i.e., larger cone angle vs
P(4-CF3C6H4)3).21 It is generally accepted that β-hydride
elimination proceeds through a planar 4-centered transi-
tion state.22 This requires alkyl-Pd(II) intermediate 12 to
adopt transiently a high energy conformation where angle
x deviates from ideality (Scheme 4b). We suggest that
selective β-hydride elimination is facilitated by the inter-
play of the sterically demanding ligand system (PR3 =
P(3,5-(CF3)2C6H3)3) with the bulky dihydropyrrole moi-
ety (vs the smaller propyl group) (conformation I vs II). In
conformation I, steric repulsion between these two groups
is alleviated by progressing to TS-I en route to the desired
dihydropyrrole10k. Inconformation II, the smaller propyl
group suffers less severe steric interactions with the ligand,
and so progression to TS-II, and ultimately 11k, is
a Isolated yield of the major E-alkene isomer; only E-alkene products
were observed. Total cyclization yields and selectivities were deter-
b
mined by 1H NMR of the crude reaction mixture (vs trimethoxybenzene
as a standard). Isolated as a 6:1 mixture of alkene regioisomers.
c
d Isolated as a 12:1 mixture of alkene regioisomers.
In the cyclizations presented in Scheme 2, product
selectivity is dictated by the strategic installation of an aryl
group although the ligand may also play a role (vide infra).
Consequently, in cases where CÀHa is not benzylic (see
Scheme 1c), it was unclear whether cyclizations could be
selective for chiral products. Pleasingly, using the same
reaction conditions as outlined in Scheme 2, cyclization
of 9jÀl afforded dihydropyrroles 10jÀl with between
3:1 and 5:1 selectivity over the undesired pyrroles 11jÀl
(Scheme 3). Here, the lower product selectivities are
offset by the more efficient cyclizations (73À87% total
cyclization yield), and so the targets could still be isolated
in synthetically useful yields (58À60%).18 In the case of 10j,
(15) In the absence of palladium, pentafluorobenzoyl oxime esters
are stable to the reaction conditions (see ref 5).
(16) For the synthesis of oxime esters employed here see the Support-
ing Information. Oxime ester geometry does not affect the efficiency of
cyclization, and facile interconversion likely occurs at the stage of the
imino-Pd(II) intermediate (see ref 8).
(17) A strong trend between the electronics of the aryl moiety and
product selectivity is not evident. However, the importance of the aryl
group is underscored by comparing the cyclization results of 9a and 9k
using PPh3 as the ligand (12:1 vs 1:1.6 selectivity; see text and Scheme 4).
(18) We have also explored the cyclization of compound 3. Under our
optimized conditions we have been able to obtain a 62% overall yield
and 1:3 ratio of 4:5. However, control experiments indicate that dihy-
dropyrrole 5 is not stable to the reaction conditions and so yields and
selectivities are variable in this particular case.
(19) The regioisomer ratio of 10j is constant over the course of the
reaction suggesting that isomerization occurs prior to dissociation of
PdÀH. For related observations, see: Mei, T.-S.; Werner, E. W.;
Burckle, A. J.; Sigman, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 6830.
(20) In all cases, the ratio of 10k:11k was largely constant over the
time frame of the reaction, thereby supporting kinetic product selection.
(21) The cone angle for P(3,5-(CF3)2C6H3)3 has been determined as
160° vs 155° for PPh3 and P(4-CF3C6H4)3: Howell, J. A. S.; Fey, N.;
Lovatt, J. D.; Yates, P. C.; McArdle, P.; Cunningham, D.; Sadeh, E.;
Gottlieb, H. E.; Goldschmidt, Z.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Light, M. E.
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1999, 3015.
(22) Koga, N.; Obara, S.; Kitaura, K.; Morokuma, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1985, 107, 7109.
4618
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 17, 2013