The similarity in the proteins isolated by both compounds
imply that the cytosolic targets of Sanguinamide B are
ribosomes.
To verify that compounds 2, 3, and 4 act as translation
inhibitors, we utilized a cell-free in vitro translation assay.
Measuring protein synthesis in the presence of the deriva-
tives, as well as comparing the results to a commercially
available translational inhibitor (G418),11 provides evi-
dence on whether our molecules inhibit protein synthesis
(Figure 2a). The concentrations of compounds used in the
assays were based on the IC50 values of the compounds.
Using HCT-116 cell lysate as the ribosomal source, we
added accessory proteins and monitored the translation
of active green fluorescent protein (GFP). The amount of
GFP was measured and quantitated by flow cytometry.
Relative fluorescence units (RFU) for each reaction were
normalized to a positive control, which contained the GFP
reporter system but no compounds or translational inhi-
bitors (Figure 2a). Comparing compounds 2, 3, and 4 to
the positive control, we observe a significant reduction in
translation of GFP compared to the positive control.
Compound 2 (50 μM) reduces translation by 4.5-fold
(22 ( 2.4% RFU; p < 0.0007), and compound 3
(50 μM) by 5.6-fold (18 ( 0.5% RFU; p < 0.0001).
Compound 4 (20 μM) reduced translation by 4.5-fold,
but with 2.5 times less compound (22 ( 3.9% RFU; p <
0.03). The reduction in GFP translation observed with San
B analogues was similar to that observed with the transla-
tion inhibitor G418 (5 μM) (14 ( 1.4% RFU; p < 0.0023).
Although the potency of San B derivatives must be opti-
mized, our results show that the D-Phe analogues of San B
inhibit in vitro translation by 80% at concentrations
similar to their IC50 values.
Protein synthesis, cell growth, and cell cycle progression
are tightly coupled events.8a Many ribosomal proteins
contribute extra ribosomal functions that can affect both
gene transcription and translation.12 Protein L7 (from the
60S subunit) is overexpressed in colorectal cancers, causes
cell cycle arrest, and induces apoptosis.8a,13 Our data show
that all three compounds (2, 3, and 4) are cytotoxic to the
colon cancer cell line and they bind to ribosomal subunits
including L7.
Thus, we anticipate that the San B derivatives would
halt DNA synthesis and induce apoptosis. To measure
the impact of the San B analogues on DNA synthesis, we
measured BrdU incorporation in HCT-116 cells when
treated with 2, 3, or 4 (Figure S3).6 Our data suggest that
compound 4 has a significant inhibitory effect on DNA
synthesis. To analyze the mechanism of growth inhibition,
we examined cell morphology, caspase 3/7 activity
(Figure S2),6 and cell permeability of HCT-116 cells
Figure 2. (a) Cell-free based in vitro translation assay. Positive
(Fully translated proteins), Negative (No protein production),
G418 (5 μM), 2 (50 μM), 3 (50 μM), 4 (20 μM). The average of
five independent experiments are shown. (b) Cell membrane
permeability of HCT-116 cells after 48 h of treatment, as
measured by 7-AAD uptake. Compound concentrations are
identical to those used in part a.
treated with San B derivatives. Treatment of cells with
40 μM of 2 induced the formation of sickle-shaped nuclei
in treated cells, a modest increase in caspase 3 activity
over the DMSO control, and 23% of 2-treated cells
were permeable as measured by 7-AAD incorporation
(Figures 2b, 3C, and S2). These results point to auto-
phagy as the primary mechanism for 2-mediated growth
inhibition.
Autophagy is a cellular defense mechanism whereby cells
degrade cytoplasmic molecules and misfolded proteins
when the proteasome degradation pathway is compro-
mised and/or the endoplasmic reticulum is undergoing
stress.14 Cellular components are degraded in large auto-
phagic vacuoles called autophagosomes, and cells can
utilize this mechanism to replenish amino acids and main-
tain homeostasis. There is a degree of overlap between the
pathways that control autophagy and those that induce
apoptosis, and caspase 3 can be detected in autophagic
cells.15 Since 2 binds to ribosomal proteins and inhibits
translation, we believe that 2 causes endoplasmic reticulum
stress and leads to the induction of autophagy within 48 h.
Treatment of cells with 40 μM of 3 induced 51% cell per-
meability over the DMSO control as measured by 7-AAD
staining (Figure 2b). Interestingly, the cell morphology
(11) Eustice, D. C.; Wilhelm, J. M. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
1984, 26, 53.
€
(12) Lindstrom, M. S. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 379,
167.
(14) Zheng, H.-y.; Zhang, X.-y.; Wang, X.-f.; Sun, B.-c. Differentia-
tion 2012, 4, 11.
(15) Bursch, W.; Karwan, A.; Mayer, M.; Dornetshuber, J.;
Frohwein, U.; Schulte-Hermann, R.; Fazi, B.; Di Sano, F.; Piredda,
L.; Piacentini, M.; Petrovski, G.; Fesus, L.; Gerner, C. Toxicology 2008,
254, 147.
(13) (a) von Mikecz, A.; Hemmerich, P.; Peter, H.-H.; Krawinkel, U.
Immunobiology 1994, 192, 137. (b) Kasai, H.; Nadano, D.; Hidaka, E.;
Higuchi, K.; Kawakubo, M.; Sato, T. A.; Nakayama, J. J. Histochem.
Cytochem. 2003, 51, 567. (c) Neumann, F.; Hemmerich, P.; Vonmikecz,
A.; Peter, H. H.; Krawinkel, U. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23, 195.
4640
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 18, 2013