Chemical Research in Toxicology
Article
preconditionned C18 column (AIT, Houilles, France) using water/
CH3CN gradients to afford compound 3 as a green-orange solid (32.0
mg, 89%). Rf = 0.37 (SiO2, CH2Cl2/methanol 2:1 v/v + 0.1% acetic
acid). HRMS (ESI−) calcd for C49H54O15S15, 1361.9273; found,
1361.9226.
and in methanol containing 0.05 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluor-
oborate for radicals 1a-5. Solutions were carefully degassed by the
bubbling of nitrogen before each measurement. The redox potentials
were calculated according to the equation E = (Ep,a + Ep,c)/2.
HPLC Analysis. Analysis of products was performed at room
temperature on a Super ODS (TSK gel reverse-phase, 50 mm × 4.6
Tris(8-[2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethoxycarboxyl-2,2,6,6-
tetramethylbenzo[1,2-d;4,5-d′]bis[1,3]dithiol-4-yl)methyl Radical, 4.
Cesium carbonate (19.5 mg, 60.0 μmol) was added to a solution of 1a
(15.0 mg, 15.0 μmol) in 1.0 mL of freshly distilled DMF. After 30 min
at room temperature, 1-bromo-2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethane
(obtained from 2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy) ethoxy]ethanol using CBr4
and triphenylphosphine in THF, following a described protocol)36
(52.0 mg, 229 μmol) and KI (1.0 mg, 6.0 μmol) were added. The
mixture was stirred under argon for 36 h, and the solvent was
evaporated under high vacuum. The crude product was purified by
chromatography on SiO2 with diethyl ether/cyclohexane gradients to
afford compound 4 as a brown solid (18.0 mg, 82%). Rf = 0.85 (SiO2,
CH2Cl2/methanol 9:1 v/v + 0.1% acetic acid). HRMS for 4 chelating
Na+(ESI+): calcd for C61H81NaO15S12, 1460.2122 ; found, 1460.2122.
Tris(8-[4-triphenylphosphonium]butyloxycarboxyl-2,2,6,6-
tetramethylbenzo[1,2-d;4,5-d′]bis[1,3]dithiol-4-yl)methyl Radical,
Bromide, 5. Cesium carbonate (78.0 mg, 240 μmol) was added to a
solution of 1a (60.0 mg, 60.0 μmol) in 3 mL of freshly distilled DMF.
After 30 min at room temperature, (4-bromobutyl)-
triphenylphosphonium bromide (431.0 mg, 900 μmol) and KI (2.5
mg, 15.0 μmol) were added, and the mixture was stirred under argon
for 24 h. The solvent was evaporated under high vacuum, and the
crude product was purified by chromatography on neutral alumina
with CH2Cl2/ethanol gradients to afford compound 5 as a green-
orange solid (115.0 mg, 87%). Rf = 0.69 (Al2O3, CH2Cl2/ethanol/
water 50:45:5 v/v/v). HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C106H105O6P3S12,
1950.3773; found, 1950.3771.
Synthesis of Triarylmethanes 2-H and 3-H. Tris(8-[3-
trimethylammonium]propyloxycarboxyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethylbenzo-
[1,2-d;4,5-d′]bis[1,3]dithiol-4-yl)methane, Bromide, 2-H. Radical 2
(10.0 mg, 6.5 μmol) was dissolved in 10 mL of 0.01 M deoxygenated
HCl, and Na2S2O4 (2.3 mg, 13.2 μmol) was added. After 15 min at
room temperature under argon, water was evaporated under vacuum,
and the crude product was dissolved in 1 mL of CH3CN. The solution
was filtered and concentrated under vacuum to afford triarylmethane
2-H (10.0 mg, 100%) as a yellow solid. 1H NMR (CD3OD) δ 5.52 (s,
1H), 4.44−4.52 (m, 6H), 3.60 (t, 6H, J = 8.5), 3.21 (s, 27 H), 2.34−
2.40 (m, 6H), 1.80 (s, 9H), 1.79 (s, 9H), 1.75 (s, 9H), 1.68 (s, 9H).
13C NMR (CD3OD) δ 23.95, 28.82, 28.94, 33.87, 34.99, 54.01, 63.48,
mm, 2 μm, Interchim, Montluco̧ n, France) using a Spectra Physics
HPLC system. The mobile phase was a mixture of solvent A (10 mM
ammonium acetate, pH 6.5) and solvent B (acetonitrile) with the
following gradient: 0−2 min, isocratic elution with 5% B; 2−22 min,
linear increase from 5 to 90% B; 22−25 min, isocratic elution with
95% B; 25−27 min, linear decrease to 5% B; and 27−35 min, re-
equilibration at 5% B. The flow rate was 1 mL·min−1, and the
absorbance was monitored at 270 nm using a Borwin data acquisition
software. Under these conditions, the retention times for 1a and 1a-H,
QMa, 2, and 2-H, and 3 and 3-H were 7.3, 10.7, 16.5, and 9.6 min,
respectively. HPLC-MS studies were performed on a Surveyor HPLC
instrument coupled to the LCQ Advantage ion trap spectrometer
(Thermo Scientific, Courtaboeuf, France) under the above-described
conditions, except that the flow rate was 500 μL.min−1.
Preparation of Rat Liver Microsomes and Cytosols. Male
Sprague−Dawley rats (200−250 g) were provided laboratory chow
and water ad libitum. After 7 days of adaptation, animals were treated
with phenobarbital (80 mg·kg−1, in 0.9% saline, i.p. for 4 days). Liver
cytosols and microsomes were prepared by differential centrifugation
as previously reported and stored at −80 °C until use.37 Protein
concentrations were determined by the Bradford assay with bovine
serum albumin as standard.38 Cytochrome P450 contents were
determined by the method of Omura and Sato.39
Hydrolytic Stability of Radicals 2 and 3 in the Presence of Rat
Liver Cytosol or Microsomes. The hydrolytic stability of esters 2 and 3
(100 μM) was tested at 37 °C in the presence of 0.10 mg·mL−1 rat
liver cytosolic or 1.0 mg·mL−1 microsomal proteins in 0.1 M
phosphate buffer containing 0.1 mM EDTA. The reactions were
stopped by the addition of cold acetonitrile followed by centrifugation
for 15 min at 13,000 rpm, and the supernatants were analyzed by UV−
vis spectroscopy. The final concentrations of radicals were estimated
using ε491 nm = 14,500 M−1·cm−1 and 15,000 M−1·cm−1 for 2 and 3,
respectively. The supernatants were also analyzed by HPLC as
described above. The esterase activity of rat liver cytosol and
microsomes toward para-nitrophenol acetate was determined
following a previously described colorimetric method.40 The reactions
were performed at 37 °C in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.4
containing 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.10 mg·mL−1 cytosolic, or 1.0 mg·mL−1
microsomal proteins and were initiated by the addition of 1 mM para-
nitrophenol acetate (from a fresh 0.1 M solution in Me2SO). The
formation of para-nitrophenol was determined by following changes in
63.92, 64.16, 64.52, 65.49, 121.26, 131.43, 140.73, 141.46, 142.05,
142.97, 167.02. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C58H82N3O6S12, 1300.2852;
found, 1300.2816.
Tris(8-[3-sulfonic acid]propyloxycarboxyl-2,2,6,6-
tetramethylbenzo[1,2-d;4,5-d′]bis[1,3]dithiol-4-yl)methane, Sodium
Salt, 3-H. Radical 3 (10.0 mg, 7.0 μmol) was dissolved in 10 mL of
0.01 M deoxygenated HCl, and Na2S2O4 (2.4 mg, 13.8 μmol) was
added. After 15 min at room temperature under an argon atmosphere,
water was evaporated under vacuum, and the crude product was
dissolved in 1 mL of methanol. The solution was filtered and
concentrated under vacuum to afford triarylmethane 3-H (10.0 mg,
absorbance at 405 nm for 3 min and quantitated using Δε405 nm
=
13,000 M−1·cm−1.
Incubations of Radicals 2 and 3 in the Presence of Rat Liver
Microsomes and NADPH under Aerobic Conditions. Incubations
were performed at 37 °C in Eppendorf tubes. Typical aerobic
incubation mixtures (final volume 150 μL) contained 100 μM radicals
2 or 3 in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.4, 0.1 mM EDTA and 0.5−
0.8 mg·mL−1 microsomal proteins (1.0 μM P450). After equilibration
for 5 min at 37 °C, the reactions were started by the addition of
NADPH (1 mM, final concentration). After 30 min, the reaction
mixtures were quenched by the addition of cold acetonitrile (same
volume) and centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 rpm, and aliquots were
analyzed by HPLC as described above. The final concentrations of
radicals were estimated using ε491 nm = 14,500 M−1·cm−1 and 15,000
M−1·cm−1 for 2 and 3, respectively.
Metabolism of 2 and 3 by Rat Liver Microsomes in the Presence
of NADPH under Anaerobic Conditions. Anaerobic incubations were
performed at 37 °C in 1-cm path length quartz cuvettes previously
purged with argon and stopped with a rubber septum. Liver
microsomes were gently degassed by argon flowing at the surface of
the sample for 5 min at 4 °C. Meanwhile, the buffer was also degassed
by argon bubbling for at least 30 min at 4 °C before being added to
degassed liver microsomes. Typical anaerobic incubation mixtures
1
100%) as a yellow solid. H NMR (CD3OD) δ 5.46 (s, 1H), 4.44−
4.55 (m, 6H), 3.07 (t, 6H, J = 7.5), 2.27−2.33 (m, 6H), 1.80 (s, 9H),
1.77 (s, 9H), 1.74 (s, 9H), 1.67 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (CD3OD) δ 25.93,
29.14, 29.36, 33.51, 34.62, 49.75, 63.42, 63.64, 64.26, 66.51, 121.44,
131.29, 140.57, 141.40, 141.91, 142.96, 167.38. HRMS (ESI−) calcd
for C49H55O15S15, 1362.9352; found, 1362.9318.
Cyclic Voltammetry. Cyclic voltammetry was carried out with a
PST20 Autolab potensiostat (Metrohm Autolab BV, Utrecht, The
Netherlands) interfaced with a PC computer. Experiments were
performed in a water-jacketed electrochemical cell maintained at 20 °C
with a circulating water bath, using a platinum-wire auxiliary electrode,
and a saturated calomel reference electrode (+ 0.242 V vs standard
hydrogen electrode). The working electrode was a glassy carbon
electrode (0.071 cm2). Measurements were carried out in 0.1 M
phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 containing 0.1 mM EDTA for radicals 1a-3
C
dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx400250a | Chem. Res. Toxicol. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX