Published on Web 11/14/2002
Synthesis of Sugar Arrays in Microtiter Plate
Fabio Fazio,† Marian C. Bryan,† Ola Blixt,‡ James C. Paulson,‡ and
Chi-Huey Wong*,†
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry and Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, and
Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute,
10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037
Received June 27, 2002
Abstract: 1,3-Dipolar cycloadditions between azides and alkynes were exploited to attach oligosaccharides
to a C14 hydrocarbon chain that noncovalently binds to the microtiter well surface. Synthesis of sugar arrays
was performed on a micromolar scale in situ in the microtiter plate. As a model study, the â-galactosyllipid
5 was displayed on a 4-µmol scale. Formation of product was confirmed via ESI-MS, and the yield was
determined via chemical and biological assays. Several complex carbohydrates (6-16) were also displayed
in microtiter plates and successfully screened with various lectins. Moreover, sialyl Lewis x (17) was
synthesized via the enzymatic fucosylation of a precursor displayed in the plate. Studies on inhibition of
this biotransformation have been carried out, and the IC50 value found for the known inhibitor 20 was
consistent with previous studies in solution.
Introduction
slides can be used to immobilize microspots of carbo-
hydrate polymers without covalent conjugation. Mrksich et al.6
Cells universally carry a sugar coating formed by glycopro-
teins and glycolipids, which are involved in highly specific
recognition events between cells and proteins, hormones,
antibodies, and toxins. Understanding the mechanism of these
processes may lead to the development of new anti-infective,
anticancer, and anti-inflammatory strategies.1-3
Due to the increasing need to decipher the information
contained in complex carbohydrates, simple and readily acces-
sible methods for high-throughput analysis must be developed.
Microarrays have been reported to be one of the most frequently
used approaches because large libraries of compounds can be
quickly screened and only small quantities of material are
required,4 an important consideration due to the low availability
of some complex carbohydrates. Few approaches have been
developed, thus far, for the fabrication of carbohydrate microar-
rays. Wang et al.5 have found that nitrocellulose-coated glass
exploited the Diels-Alder mediated immobilization of carbo-
hydrate-cyclopentadiene conjugates to a monolayer that pre-
sents benzoquinone groups displayed on a gold surface.
Recently, Shin et al.7 reported on the attachment of maleimide-
linked carbohydrates to a glass slide coated by thiol groups,
and Feizi et al.8 described microarrays of oligosaccharides
displayed as neoglycolipids on nitrocellulose.
Our goal is to develop a simple and efficient system to attach
complex sugars to a microtiter plate to screen for their specific
interactions with proteins.
One major difficulty with regard to this subject is to identify
the appropriate functional groups and the generally useful
chemistry for attaching saccharides to various types of surfaces,
either covalently or noncovalently. We have chosen cyclo-
addition reactions, as they are often simple, reagent-free, and
very selective, but we have avoided the use of olefins, as
sustaining the reductive conditions often used in the final
deprotection of synthetic oligosaccharides is difficult in the
olefin group. In our effort to develop a simple, noncovalent
method for the preparation of saccharide arrays in microtiter
plates, we have found that a saturated hydrocarbon that is 13
to 15 carbons in length can stick to the surface of polystyrene
microtiter plates, and the glycolipids displayed are stable under
repeated aqueous washings and are functional in biological
screens.9 Because the preparation of glycolipids for microarrays
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wong@
scripps.edu
† Department of Chemistry and Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology,
The Scripps Research Institute.
‡ Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute.
(1) (a) Sears, P.; Wong, C.-H. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1998, 54, 223. (b) Lis, H.;
Sharon, N. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993, 218, 1. (c) Varki, A. Glycobiology 1993,
3, 97. (d) Dove, A. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 913. (e) Bertozzi, C. R.;
Kiessling, L. L. Science 2001, 291, 2357.
(2) Hakamori, S. Cancer Res. 1985, 45, 2405.
(3) Rademacher, T. W.; Parekh, R. B.; Dwek R. A. Glycobiology, Annu. ReV.
Biochem. 1988, 57, 785.
(4) (a) Fodor, S.; Read, J. L.; Pirrung, M. C.; Stryer, L.; Lu, A. T.; Solas, D.
Science, 1991, 251, 767. (b) Whitesides, G. M.; Love, J. C. Sci. Am. 2001,
285, 38. (c) Cui, Y.; Wei, Q. Q.; Park, H. K.; Lieber, C. M. Science 2001,
293, 1289. (d) Pirrung, M. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1277. (e)
Kodadek, T. Chem. Biol. 2001, 8, 105. (f) Hergenrother, P. J.; Depew, K.
M., Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7849. (g) Horan, S.;
Yan, L.; Isobe, H.; Whitesides, G. M.; Kahne, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1999, 96, 11 782.
(6) (a) Houseman, B. T.; Mrksich, M. Chem. Biol. 2002, 9, 443. (b) Kwon,
Y.; Mrksich, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 806. (c) Houseman, B. T.;
Huh, J. H.; Kron, S. J.; Mrksich, M. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 270.
(7) Park, S.; Shin, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3180.
(8) Fukui, S.; Feizi, T.; Galustian, C.; Lawson, A. M.; Chai, W. Nat. Biotechnol.
Advance online publication.
(5) Wang, D. N.; Liu, S. Y.; Trummer, B. J.; Deng, C.; Wang, A. L. Nat.
Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 275.
(9) Bryan, M. C.; Plettenburg, O.; Sears, P.; Rabuka, D.; Wacowich-Sgarbi,
S.; Wong C.-H. Chem. Biol. 2002, 9, 713.
9
10.1021/ja020887u CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2002, 124, 14397-14402
14397