protection via treatment with tert-butyldiphenylsilyl
chloride (TBDPS-Cl) and imidazole to form 3 and 4.
Isopropylidene protection of the 3- and 4-hydroxyl groups,
followed by buffered fluoridolysis of the silyl ether, af-
forded acceptors 5 and 6 in good yield over the two steps.
Gratifyingly, glycosylation of both acceptors with a stoi-
chiometric quantity of N-acetyl-5N,4O-carbonyl protected
phenylthiosialoside 710b under N-iodosuccinimide/triflic
acid (NIS/TfOH) promotion conditions at À38 °C furn-
ished the sialylated glycosyl amino acids 8 and 9 in 94%
and 80% yield, respectively, with only the R-sialoside pro-
duced in both cases. The R-stereochemistry was confirmed
through extraction of the 3JC1,H3ax coupling constants (see
Supporting Information (SI)).13 It is important to note that
only 0.4 equiv of TfOH was employed, so as to prevent
acidolysis of the isopropylidene. Rather than removing the
oxazolidinone auxiliary at this stage, we anticipated that it
could be removed following solid-phase assembly of the
glycopeptides. Accordingly, hydrolysis of the isopropyli-
dene acetals of 8 and 9 with aqueous AcOH, followed by
reductive acetylation of the C2-azido moiety with nano-
particle Zn, Ac2O, and AcOH, and acetylation of the free
hydroxyl groups at the 3- and 4-positions with Ac2O,
pyridine, and DMAP, gave acetamides 10 and 11 in 87%
and 81% yield over 3 steps. Finally, acidolysis of the tert-
butyl ester with TFA, triisopropylsilane, and water pro-
vided the peracetylated STN-derived Ser and Thr cassettes
12 and 13 in good overall yields.
Next, we turned our attention to the synthesis of suitably
protected 2,6-ST Ser and Thr cassettes. Deacetylation
of 1 and 2 followed by treatment with benzaldehyde
dimethylacetal/TsOHprovided benzylidene acetals 14
and 15. Schmidt glycosylation between acceptors 14 and
15 and tetraacetyl-D-galactose trichloroacetimidate (16)
afforded T-antigen core structures 17 and 18 in good yield
with complete β-selectivity due to the neighboring group
effect. The benzylidene acetal was next removed by hydro-
lysis with aqueous AcOH to provide diols 19 and 20.
Regioselective glycosylation of the 6-hydroxyl of acceptors
19 and 20 with a stoichiometric quantity of donor 7 under
NIS/TfOH promotion conditions afforded the correspond-
ing 2,6-ST core structures 21 and 22 in 81% and 80% yield,
respectively. Small quantities of the doubly sialylated tetra-
saccharides were detected by LC-MS (<5%); however,
these could be easily separated from the desired products by
flash chromatography. The stereo- and regiochemistry of
the ST glycosylamino acids 21 and 22 were confirmed by
NMR spectroscopic analysis (see SI). From here, reductive
acetylation of the C2-azide was achieved by treatment
with nanoparticle Zn in a mixture of AcOH and Ac2O
at elevated temperature (40 °C). The crude N-acetylated
glycosylamino acids were subsequently treated with Ac2O,
pyridine, and DMAPto acetylate the remaining 4-hydroxyl
group to provide 23 and 24 in 72% and 73% yield,
respectively. Finally, acidolytic cleavage of the tert-butyl
ester with TFA/iPr3SiH/H2O gave the target 2,6-ST amino
acids 25 and 26 in excellent yields.
Having synthesized the requisite glycosyl-Ser and
glycosyl-Thr building blocks we were next interested in
demonstrating their utility in the synthesis of glycopep-
tides via direct incorporation into Fmoc-SPPS protocols.
Specifically, we targeted four tumor-associated MUC1
glycopeptides 27À30 which were chosen with a view to
incorporation into synthetic cancer vaccine candidates in
future work (Scheme 2). Glycopeptides 27 and 28 possess
an STN- or ST-derived Ser moiety, respectively, within
the amino acid sequence GSTAPPAHGVT which embo-
dies the immunostimulatory GSTA epitope of MUC1.14
In contrast, glycopeptide targets 29 and 30 correspond
to an entire copy of the MUC1 VNTR region
(SAPDTRPAPGSTAPPAHGVT) with a key Thr residue
within the PDTRP immunodominant epitope14b,c,15 deri-
vatized with an STN (29) or ST (30) moiety. Synthesis of 27
and 28 began from preloaded 2-chlorotrityl chloride resin
31 which was elongated via Fmoc-SPPS to provide resin
bound nonapeptide 32. From here glycosyl-Ser building
blocks 12 and 25, bearing either the STN or ST antigen
respectively, were coupled to the resin bound peptide. It is
worth noting that due to the propensity of glycosyl-
Ser residues to epimerize upon coupling, a slight excess
of the precious glycosylamino acid (1.2 equiv) was used
in the presence of 2-(1H-7- azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-
tetramethyl uronium hexafluorophosphate (HATU, 1.2
equiv), sym-collidine (1.2 equiv), and 1-hydroxy-7-azaben-
zotriazole (HOAt, 1.5 equiv).16 Pleasingly, these condi-
tions almost completely prevented epimerization (<5%
detected by LC-MS) and facilitated quantitative coupling
to afford resin bound 33 and 34. Upon N-terminal Fmoc-
deprotection we discovered that the oxazolidinone moiety
was susceptible to nucleophilic attack with piperidine,
generating resin-bound N-acetyl piperidyl urea and piper-
idylurea byproducts (see SI). Assuch, weset outtoidentify
improved conditions for the en bloc removal of the oxazo-
lidinone moiety prior to further elongation of the glyco-
peptide chain. The optimized conditions involved treating
the resin bound peptides 33 and 34 with DTT and DBU in
DMF which led to clean opening of the oxazolidinone and
concomitant Fmoc-deprotection (see SI). The resulting
peptide was subsequently elongated by a further glycine
residue to provide 35 and 36. Having prepared the desired
resin bound target, the glycopeptides were deprotected and
cleaved from the resin by treating with an acidic cocktail.
ꢀ
The crude glycopeptides were next subjected to Zemplen
deacetylation conditions followed by saponification of the
(14) (a) Tarp, M. A.; Sørensen, A. L.; Mandel, U.; Paulsen, H.;
Burchell, J.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; Clausen, H. Glycobiology 2007,
€
17, 197. (b) Westerlind, U.; Schroder, H.; Hobel, A.; Gaidzik, N.;
Kaiser, A.; Niemeyer, C. M.; Schmitt, E.; Waldmann, H.; Kunz, H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8263.
(15) Burchell, J.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; Boshell, M.; Gendler, S.;
Duhig, T. Int. J. Cancer 1989, 44, 691.
(13) (a) Haverkamp, J.; Spoormaker, T.; Dorland, L.; Vliegenthart,
J. F. G.; Schauer, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 4851. (b) Hori, H.;
Nakajima, T.; Nishida, Y.; Ohrui, H.; Meguro, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1988, 29, 6317. (c) Prytulla, S.; Lauterwein, J.; Klessinger, M.; Thiem, J.
Carbohydr. Res. 1991, 215, 345.
(16) (a) Zhang, Y.; Muthana, S. M.; Farnsworth, D.; Ludek, O.;
Adams, K.; Barchi, J. J.; Gildersleeve, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134,
6316. (b) Zhang, Y. L.; Muthana, S. M.; Barchi, J. J.; Gildersleeve, J. C.
Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3958.
5796
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 22, 2013