that it simply provides polymeric support. These results were
very encouraging and spurred us to further explore this reaction.
Because lipase is known to catalyse the transesterification
reaction in organic solvents,9 we selected ethanol and tert-
butanol as the substrates (and also solvents) to investigate
the possibility of a one-pot Knoevenagel condensation/ester-
exchange reaction. A protocol for one enzyme that catalyses two
reaction types sequentially would be of interest and, moreover,
studying the kinetics of the reaction may help us to better
understand the mechanism of the enzyme promiscuity.
Some substituted aromatic aldehydes and methyl cyanoac-
etate were tested to verify the catalytic effect of the enzyme
(Scheme 1). In a typical experiment, an aromatic aldehyde
(1 mmol) and methyl cyanoacetate (1 mmol) were added to
alcohol (5 mL) containing enzyme (50 mg) and then incubated
at 40 ◦C in an end-over-end rotator at 150 rpm for 12 h. The
isolated yield of 1, 2, and 3 were all greater than 75%, while the
yields of 4 through 12 ranged from 34% to 60%. The yields of
aldehydes with electron-withdrawing groups were higher than
those with electron-donating groups. The structure of products
Fig. 1 Kinetic curve of Knoevenagel condensation and esterification
of benzaldehyde and methyl cyanoacetate catalysed by lipase in ethanol.
hypothesised that observed promiscuity is not due to the
classical mechanism of hydrolytic enzymes, instead suggesting
that alternate-site enzyme promiscuity is at work. Although we
do not have direct evidence, our results are in line with their
conclusions.
In summary, our experiments suggest that several enzymes,
especially lipase from porcine pancreas, catalyse the Knoeve-
nagel condensation with esterification with high yields. This is
the first time that enzymes had been shown to catalyse two
different reactions sequentially to form complex compounds.
Although the details of the catalytic mechanism remain un-
clear, the present observations extend the utility of enzyme
promiscuity.
1
was confirmed by H NMR and MS. Both condensation and
transesterification proceeded cleanly in ethanol, and as expected,
the transesterification in tert-butanol was incomplete (less than
1%) because of steric hindrances. However, in tert-butanol,
the Knoevenagel condensation proceeded to nearly 100% (GC
yield). GC-MS was used to monitor the lipase-catalysed kinetics
of the reaction between benzaldehyde and methyl cyanoacetate
(Fig. 1). The initial reaction rate of the condensation was
0.54 mM h-1, whereas the rate of transesterification was 0.01
mM h-1; clearly, condensation proceeded much faster than the
esterification reaction.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (No. 21076052).
Notes and references
1 N. Hessenauer-Ilicheva, A. Franke and D. Meyer et al., Chem.–Eur.
J., 2009, 15(12), 2941; R. O. M. A. De Souza, O. A. C. Antunes
and W. Kroutil, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 6157; S. G. Burton, D.
A. Cowan and J. M. Woodley, Nat. Biotechnol., 2002, 20(1), 37; E.
Champion, I. Andre and C. Mouli, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131,
7379.
Scheme 1 Knoevenagel condensation combined with esterification in
one pot in ethanol.
2 O. Khersonsky, C. Roodveldt and D. S. Tawfik, Curr. Opin. Chem.
We also varied temperature, catalyst concentration, and
reaction time. We found that the reactions were successful in
both aqueous and organic solvents when carried out for 64 h at
60 ◦C with 1% of the enzyme concentration. When carried out
in 1.5% water, the desired product (1) was obtained with a 90%
yield by GC.
A generally accepted catalytic mechanism for lipases is that
the active site for hydrolysis also contributes to promiscuous
catalysis.10 However; this mechanism cannot explain why some
lipases are active while others show no activity under the
same reaction conditions. This mechanism also cannot explain
our finding that hog pancreatic amylase can also catalyse this
reaction in organic solvents (Table 1). Reetz et al.11 recently
Biol., 2006, 10(5), 498.
3 O. Torre, I. Alfonso and V. Gotor, Chem. Commun., 2004, 1724.
4 P. Carlqvist, M. Svedendahl, C. Branneby, K. Hult, T. Brinck and P.
Berglund, ChemBioChem, 2004, 5, 1; M. Svedendahl, K. Hult and P.
Berglund, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 17988.
5 C. Li, X.-W. Feng and N. Wang et al., Green Chem., 2008, 10, 616.
6 J. M. Serafimov, D. Gillingham, S. Kuster and D. Hilvert, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 7798.
7 Y. Terao, K. Miyamoto and H. Ohta, Chem. Lett., 2007, 36, 420.
8 C. Li, N. Wang, K. Li, W.-W. Zhang, Z. Wang and X.-Q. Yu, Green
Chem., 2009, 11, 1933.
9 O. Ulbert, T. Fra´ter, K. Be´lafi-Bako´ and L. Gubicza, J. Mol. Catal.
B: Enzym., 2004, 31, 39.
10 K. Hult and P. Berglund, Trends Biotechnol., 2007, 25, 231.
11 A. Taglieber, H. Ho¨benreich, D. D. Carballeira, R. J. Mondie`re and
M. T. Reetz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 8597.
1918 | Green Chem., 2010, 12, 1917–1918
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
©