Because of these disadvantages, we often had to use
tremendous excesses of reagents (50 equiv of TIPSOTf is
needed to drive a silyl protection of the â-hydroxy group of
the diketide product to completion!) and unacceptably long
reaction times. Reactions involving heterogeneous catalysis
(e.g., hydrogenations) or reactions producing insoluble
byproducts during workup (e.g., DIBAH reductions) pro-
ceeded, if at all, only very unsatisfactorily. Thus, the polymer
imposes restrictions on the choice of reagents and reaction
conditions and renders development times high. Therefore,
we decided to use a soluble polymer that can be precipitated
in a solvent different from the one used in the reaction, which
combines the best of two worlds.5,7 The favorable properties
of solution phase chemistry, particularly the higher reaction
rates,8 and the ease of reaction monitoring are combined with
the operative advantages (easy separation of excess reagents
by simple filtration of the reaction mixture) of an insoluble
support.
In the 1H NMR, even without presaturation of the polymer-
related intense resonances around 3.65 ppm, the signal of
the terminal methoxy group appears as a baseline-separated
singlet (Figure 1). Its integral serves as an internal standard
to calculate the polymer loading.
For our purposes we found it advantageous to use the
popular monomethylated poly(ethylene glycol), MeOPEG,
as the polymer of choice, although there are other alternatives
such as non-cross-linked polystyrenes evolving, leading to
interesting alternatives.9 Poly(ethylene glycol) and its monom-
ethylated derivative, introduced by Bayer and Mutter in the
early 1970s10 as a polymeric support for peptide synthesis,
is commercially available at different degrees of polymeri-
zation (up to 20 000 g/mol), are soluble in THF and
dichloromethane and can be precipitated by addition of
diethyl ether or tert-butyl methyl ether.
1
Figure 1. Part of the H NMR of aldehyde 3 (400 MHz, 2.5 mg
in 0.4 mL of CDCl3). The terminal methoxy group of the polymer
serves as an internal standard.
Polymeric aldehyde 3 was now dried by azeotropic
distillation with toluene (100 mL/mmol),12 dissolved in
dichloromethane (80 mL/mmol), and cooled to -60 °C. To
this solution were added three different enol borinates and
their respective enantiomers from a separate flask at -78
°C using PTFE tubing (Scheme 2, Table 1). The enol
To attach the starter aldehyde onto the soluble support,
we reacted MeOPEG-5000 (MW ) 5000 g/mol) with 1,4-
bis(chloromethyl)benzene following literature procedures
(Scheme 1).11 After precipitation of the polymeric aldehyde
Scheme 1. Preparation of the MeOPEG-Bound Aldehydea
Scheme 2. Asymmetric Aldol Reactions on MeOPEGa
a Reagents and conditions: (a) 6 equiv of NaH, 2 equiv of NaI,
12 equiv of 1,4-bis(dichloromethyl)benzene, THF, rt, 5 d; (b) 6
equiv of p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, sodium salt, DMF, 50 °C, 24 h.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) X ) Cl; 1.01 equiv of n-BuLi,
THF, -78 °C to rt, 1 h; (b) X ) OH; 1.03 equiv of 4, 2.5 equiv of
Et3N, 1.03 equiv of Piv-Cl, 25 °C, 2 h, 1.0 equiv of 5, 1.13 equiv
of LiCl, rt, 7h; (c) 1.15 equiv of n-Bu2BOTf (2.3 equiv, R ) CH2-
ind), 3.0 equiv of Et3N, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 30 min; (d) 0.16 equiv of 3,
CH2Cl2, -78 to -20 °C, 16 h. For R decoding, see Table 1.
in diethyl ether (300 mL/mmol) and recrystallization from
cold ethanol, we obtained a polymer loaded with 90% of
the theoretical maximum load of 0.2 mmol/g.
(6) These problems have also been observed by others. See, for
example: Harris, J. M.; Liu, Y.; Chai, S.; Andrews, M. D.; Vederas, J. C.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2407.
(7) For recent reviews on the use of soluble polymers in other applications
of organic synthesis, see: (a) Wentworth, P., Jr.; Janda, K. D. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 1917. (b) Gravert, D. J.; Janda, K. D. Chem. ReV. 1997,
97, 489. (c) Geckeler, K. E. AdV. Polym. Sci. 1995, 121, 31.
borinates were prepared from the corresponding acylated
oxazolidinones using standard procedures.2 Only in the case
of the novel 3-(3-indolyl)propyl imides 6c and ent-6c was it
532
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 4, 2000