UPDATES
reactions,[14] we became interested in exploring the yield by using EtOAc as the solvent (Table1, entry 7).
possibility of reacting N-fluoro-sulfonamides with All the other solvents, such as, DMAc, EtOH, CH3CN,
acetylene sulfones through 1,5-HAT-alkynylation.
DCE, and t-BuOH gave lower reaction efficiency
Initially, N-fluoro-N-heptyl-4-methylbenzenesulfon- (Table 1, entries 2–6). In the testing of different copper
amide (1a) and (((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)ethynyl) salts, no better results could be obtained (Table 1,
benzene (2a) were synthesized and selected as the entries 8–9). Subsequently, various nitrogen ligands
model substrates to test our hypothesis. Inspired by our and bases were tested, we were very happy to find that
previous reports,[15] the reaction was firstly performed the yield can be further improved to 85% by using 2,9-
by using Cu(OTf)2 as the catalyst with bypridine as the dimethyl-4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (L5) as the
ligand and Li2CO3 as the base in toluene as the solvent. ligand and t-BuOLi as the base (Table 1, entry 16).
To our delight, we can detect our target coupling Furthermore, the reaction efficiency is influenced
product 3a in GC-MS with 4% GC yield (Table 1, significantly by changing the equivalent of 2a or the
entry 1). Encouraged by this positive result, we next reaction temperature (Table 1, entries 17 and 18). In
evaluated various solvents. The starting material 1a the absence of base, ligand, or copper salt, the yield
can be transformed into the desired product in 40% considerably decreased to 34–0% (Table 1, entries 19–
21). The final optimized reaction conditions were
found to be: 5 mol% Cu(OTf)2/5 mol% L5 and 1.0
Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions.[a]
°
equivalent of t-BuOLi in EtOAc at 80 C which gave
3a in 79% isolated yield.
With the best reaction conditions in hand, we then
examined the substrate scope with a range of N-fluoro-
sulfonamides. As shown in Table 2, we firstly studied
the influence of the alkyl chain part. We found that this
reaction exhibited robust δ-position regioselectivity,
and a series of internal alkynes were synthesized in
good yields (Table 2, entries 1–5). Besides the secon-
Entry Catalyst
Solvent Ligand+Base Yield (%)[b]
Toluene L1+Li2CO3
DMAc L1+Li2CO3 34
EtOH L1+Li2CO3 36
CH3CN L1+Li2CO3 37
DCE L1+Li2CO3 30
tBuOH L1+Li2CO3 35
EtOAc L1+Li2CO3 40
EtOAc L1+Li2CO3 28
dary carbon radical, tertiary carbon radical can partic-
ipate in this reaction very well too (Table 2, entry 6).
In addition, cyclic carbon radical can also react
smoothly under the standard conditions; provide the
corresponding product in moderate yield (Table 2,
entry 7). However, in the cases of N-fluoro-4-methyl-
N-(4-phenylbutyl)benzenesulfonamide and N-fluoro-N-
1
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
CuBr·Me2S
4
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(hex-5-en-1-yl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide,
only
trace amount of the desired products could be detected
under our standard conditions. Then, we investigated
the scope of sulfonamide groups. Different substrates
bearing electron-donating groups or electron-with-
drawing groups on the aromatic ring all worked well
and gave the corresponding products in high yields
(Table 2, entries 8–10).
The substrate scope with respect to acetylene
sulfone was studied systematically as well. As shown
in Table 3, different aromatic sulfonyl substituted
acetylenes worked well under the standard conditions
and gave the desired alkynylation products 3a in high
yields (Table 3, entry 1). According to literature,
halogenoalkynes are one of the frequently used
reagents for electrophilic alkynylation. However, in
our system, the reaction efficiency dropped signifi-
cantly by using (iodoethynyl)benzene as the reaction
partner (Table 3, entry 2). Subsequently, we tested
various other acetylene sulfones. Substrate with elec-
tron-donating group shows slightly better result com-
pared with substrate substituted with electron-with-
drawing group (Table 3, entries 6 and 7). The steric
effect exerted by the aryl moiety is week due to the
9
Cu(OTf)·toluene EtOAc L1+Li2CO3 34
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
-
EtOAc L2+Li2CO3 52
EtOAc L3+Li2CO3 74
EtOAc L4+Li2CO3 51
EtOAc L5+Li2CO3 77
EtOAc L5+Na2CO3 76
EtOAc L5+LiOH
79
EtOAc L5+tBuOLi 85(79)[c]
EtOAc L5+tBuOLi 48[d]
EtOAc L5+tBuOLi 58[e]
EtOAc L5
EtOAc tBuOLi
EtOAc L5+tBuOLi
34[f]
<5[g]
0
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), catalyst
(5 mol%), ligand (5 mol%), base (1.0 equiv.), solvents
°
(1 mL), 80 C, 20 h.
[b] GC yields were determined by using hexadecane as the
internal standard.
[c] Isolated yield is in the parenthesis.
[d]
°
60 C.
[e] 1.2 equivalent of 2a.
[f] no base.
[g] no ligand.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 1–6
2
© 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
��
These are not the final page numbers!