Paper
Dalton Transactions
7.55 mmol) was added for 1 hour. Finally, triethylamine temperature for 15 min. The two solutions were mixed and
(0.46 mL, 3.30 mmol) was added for 30 min. The resulting pre- refluxed at 110–115 °C for 48 hours under a nitrogen
cipitate was filtered and washed with methanol, dissolved in a atmosphere. The reaction solution was filtered and then
minimum quantity of dichloromethane, and chromatographed chromatographed on silica gel (eluting with a solution of
on silica gel (eluting with a solution of dichloromethane) to dichloromethane–hexane = 1 : 3) to afford ZnTMP-Ph-PD in
1
afford a purple solid. This solid was a mixture of compounds 48% yield (45 mg, purple solid); H NMR (300 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ
that were difficult to separate over a column of silica. We (ppm) = 1.84 (18H, s), 2.62 (9H, s), 5.98 (1H, s), 6.98 (2H, t),
inserted zinc into the porphyrin product to enhance the 7.15 (2H, d), 7.23 (12H, q), 7.84 (2H, d), 7.97 (2H, d), 8.27 (2H,
polarity difference between the desired product and other by- d), 8.70 (4H, s), 8.75 (2H, d), and 8.97 (2H, d) (Fig. S10†); 13C
products and thereby assist in its purification. Complexation NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ(ppm) = 21.9, 117.5, 118.0, 118.7,
with zinc was performed by mixing a solution of crude pro- 119.0, 120.0, 120.2, 122.3, 127.9, 128.4, 129.4, 130.8, 131.3,
ducts in CH2Cl2 with zinc acetate (1.0 g, 5.45 mmol) in MeOH 132.4, 133.2, 135.1, 137.6, 138.7, 139.2, 139.3, 139.5, 139.8,
for 3 hours, and the solution was monitored by UV-Vis spectro- 141.4, 143.4, 148.3, 149.9. Anal. Calc. for C77H64N6Zn: C 81.21;
scopy till the initial spectrum had completely changed. The H 5.66; N 7.38%; found: C 81.36; H 5.71; N 7.32%. HRMS
solution was extracted with water (3 times) and the concen- calcd for [C77H65N6Zn]+
= 1136.4512, found: 1136.4533
trated organic layer was purified by chromatography over silica (Fig. S17 and S18, ESI†).
gel in which the elution solution was dichloromethane–hexane
ZnTMP-Ph2-PD. A 30 mL toluene solution of compound 6
1
= 1 : 5 to afford 5 in 6.3% yield (152 mg, red-purple solid); H (50.00 mg, 0.048 mmol) and t-BuONa (23.20 mg, 0.241 mmol)
NMR (300 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ(ppm) = 1.84 (18H, s), 2.62 (9H, s), and another 30 mL toluene solution containing TPA-NH2
7.29 (6H, s), 7.72 (2H, d), 7.83 (2H, d), 7.97 (2H, d), 8.31 (2H, (62.87 mg, 0.242 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (3.82 mg, 0.004 mmol), and
d), 8.71 (4H, s), 8.76 (2H, d), and 8.94 (2H, d); 13C NMR dppf (2.31 mg, 0.004 mmol) were stirred separately at room
(75 MHz, CDCl3) δ(ppm) = 21.9, 118.9, 119.1, 119.6, 122.0, temperature for 15 min. Under a nitrogen atmosphere, two
125.2, 127.8, 129.2, 130.9, 131.3, 132.3, 132.3, 135.2, 137.6, solutions were mixed and refluxed at 110–115 °C for 48 hours.
139.0, 139.2, 139.3, 139.5, 139.7, 140.1, 142.7, 149.9, 150.0, The reaction solution was filtered, and chromatographed on
150.1. Anal. Calc. for C59H49BrN4Zn: C 73.87; H 5.15; N 5.84%; silica gel (eluting with a solution of dichloromethane–hexane
found: C 74.12; H 5.23; N 5.88% (Fig. S13 and S14, ESI†).
= 1 : 3) to afford ZnTMP-Ph2-PD in 41% yield (24 mg, purple
Zn(Ph3-Br)(mesityl)3P (6). Pyrrole (0.67 mL, 10.0 mmol), solid); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ (ppm) = 1.84 (18H, s),
4′-bromo-4-triphenylbenzaldehyde (0.65 g, 2.5 mmol), and mesi- 2.62 (9H, s), 5.98 (1H, s), 6.98 (2H, t), 7.15 (2H, d), 7.23 (12H,
tylaldehyde (1.34 g, 10.0 mmol) were mixed in 1000 mL CHCl3 q), 7.84 (2H, d), 7.97 (2H, d), 8.27 (2H, d), 8.70 (4H, s), 8.75
solution under a nitrogen atmosphere for 10 min. BF3·OEt2 (2H, d), and 8.97 (2H, d) (Fig. S10†); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3)
(0.85 mL, 6.77 mmol) was then added to this mixture. After δ (ppm) = 21.9, 117.6, 119.4, 120.3, 121.4, 122.6, 123.7, 125.5,
stirring for about an hour, 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzo- 126.0, 126.2, 127.2, 127.4, 128.2, 128.3, 129.7, 131.1, 131.6,
quinone (DDQ, 1.75 g, 7.55 mmol) was added for 1 hour. 132.7, 135.5, 138.1, 139.7, 140.1, 140.4, 142.5, 143.9, 148.6,
Finally, triethylamine (0.46 mL, 3.30 mmol) was added for 150.4. Anal. Calc. for C83H68N6Zn: C 82.06; H 5.64; N 6.92%;
30 min. The resulting precipitate was filtered and washed with found: C 82.32; H 5.71; N 6.98%. HRMS calcd [C77H65N6Zn]+ =
methanol, taken into a minimum of dichloromethane, and 1136.4512, found: 1136.4533 (Fig. S19 and S20, ESI†).
chromatographed on silica gel (eluting with a solution of
dichloromethane) to afford a purple solid which was a mixture
of products and other compounds. Complexation with zinc
and subsequent purification over silica gel conducted in
Results and discussion
Cyclic voltammograms
accordance with the procedure described in the purification of
1
compound 5 gave 6 in 7% yield (192 mg, red-purple solid); H To elucidate the electrochemistry of PD-substituted zinc por-
NMR (300 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ(ppm) = 1.86 (18H, s), 2.62 (9H, s), phyrins, the cyclic voltammetry of PD and ZnTMP were first
7.30 (6H, s), 7.62 (2H, s), 7.78 (2H, d), 8.01 (4H, t), 8.33 (2H, d), studied separately. Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of both PD
8.73 (4H, s), 8.78 (2H, d), and 8.99 (2H, d); 13C NMR (75 MHz, and ZnTMP exhibited two well-defined one-electron reversible
CDCl3) δ(ppm) = 21.9, 118.8, 119.1, 119.8, 119.9, 121.9, 125.3, redox couples. The half potentials (E1/2) for PD were +0.59 and
127.3, 127.7, 127.9, 128.0, 128.9, 129.1, 129.2, 130.9, 131.4, +1.01 V while those for ZnTMP were +0.79 and +1.11 V.12,17
132.2, 132.3, 135.2, 137.6, 139.3, 139.5, 139.8, 140.5, 142.5, When PD and ZnTMP were titrated separately with HIm, their
149.9, 150.1. Anal. Calc. for C65H53BrN4Zn: C 75.40; H 5.16; N CVs responded differently. In the case of PD (Fig. 1(A)), the
5.41%; found: C 75.28; H 5.26; N 5.34% (Fig. S15 and S16, current of the first redox couple with an E1/2 of +0.59 V
ESI†).
increased at the cost of the second redox couple, which gradu-
ZnTMP-Ph-PD. A 30 mL toluene solution of compound 5 ally disappeared. This one-step two electron oxidation is inter-
(80.00 mg, 0.083 mmol) and t-BuONa (26.45 mg, 0.275 mmol) preted to result from the electrochemically induced hydrogen
and another 30 mL toluene solution containing TPA-NH2 bond formation between oxidized PD and HIm.17 Whereas,
(65.13 mg, 0.250 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (3.82 mg, 0.004 mmol), and when ZnTMP (Fig. 2) was titrated with HIm, the first redox
dppf (2.31 mg, 0.004 mmol) were stirred separately at room couple exhibited a cathodic shift (+0.60 V) while the second
1426 | Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 1424–1433
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014