ChemComm
Communication
associated with the 2-(4-nitrophenoxy)ethanethiols at 3.1, 4.0, and
8.2 ppm (ESI,† Fig. S6A: protons A, B, and E), while the signal for
the benzylic protons of the scaffold shifted from 3.7 ppm (adjacent
to the disulfide linkage) to 3.6 when adjacent to the thiols
(ESI,† Fig. S6B). This demonstrated the quantitative cleavage of
the disulfide bonds under reductive conditions that led to
the release of the nitrophenol derivatives by a controlled
mechanism. Additionally, this process highlighted the stability
of the covalently attached molecules, since they remained
within the scaffold through vigorous purification steps until
the disulfide bonds were cleaved.
We report the synthesis of 2nd generation polyphenylene
dendrimers that were functionalized with eight thiols throughout
their scaffolds. These thiols were used as anchor points to covalently
bind guest moieties (i.e. 2-(4-nitrophenoxy)ethanethiol) through
oxidative disulfide bond formation, which yielded chemically stable
macromolecular structures with four molecules per dendrimer.
Furthermore, under reductive conditions the disulfide linkages
could be quantitatively cleaved resulting in the discharge of all the
Fig. 2 UV-Vis and photoluminescence spectra of the pyrene core,
1st and 2nd generation PPDs, 2-(4-nitrophenoxy)ethanethiol, and function-
alized PPDs.
dendrimer, again showing that there were four residual thiols nitrophenol derivatives. To our knowledge this represents the first
after reaction with the 2-(4-nitrophenoxy)ethanethiol.
report of the covalent attachment of small molecules to the scaffold
1H NMR spectroscopy was used to calculate the number of of a dendrimer, which can be chemically cleaved, yielding stable
2-(4-nitrophenoxy)ethanethiol and end-capped methyl groups multicomponent PPDs that possess a trigger for the controlled
within the dendrimers. As seen in ESI,† Fig. S6A, by integrating release of the guest species.
the proton signals from the nitrophenol derivatives (A) and
methylthiols (F) against those of the PPDs (C and D), it was
observed that there were four small molecules and four methyl
Notes and references
1 K. Greish, T. Sawa, J. Fang, T. Akaike and H. Maeda, J. Controlled Release,
end-capped thiols in each dendrimer.
2004, 97, 219.
2 T. Fojo and C. Grady, N. Engl. J. Med., 2009, 360, 563.
3 H. Tan, T. Zhan and W. Y. Fan, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 21690.
4 S. J. Guillaudeu, M. E. Fox, Y. M. Haidar, E. E. Dy, F. C. Szoka and
A very important aspect of the molecular design of these
dendrimers was their optical properties, specifically the photo-
luminescence of the pyrene, so it was necessary to characterize the
influence of the nitrophenol derivative, a known chromophore.
Fig. 2 shows the UV-Vis absorption of the pyrene core, sequential
dendrimer generations, and the PPDs loaded with the nitrophenol
derivatives. The unfunctionalized 2nd generation PPDs had a
maximum absorption at lmax B 290 nm with an absorption from
the pyrene core at l B 380 nm, while 2-(4-nitrophenoxy)ethanethiol
had a lmax B 310 nm. PPD 2 still had a lmax B 290 nm, but
displayed a shoulder B310 nm ascribed to the attached nitrophenol
derivatives. There was a lemission B 450 nm (lexcitation = 400 nm) for
the dendrimers with and without the guest molecules, as charac-
terized by photoluminescence spectroscopy, which was expected
since there is no overlap between the photoluminescence of the
pyrene core and absorption of the nitrophenol derivatives.
´
M. J. M. Frechet, Bioconjugate Chem., 2008, 19, 461.
´
5 C. C. Lee, J. A. MacKay, M. J. M. Frechet and F. C. Szoka, Nat.
Biotechnol., 2005, 23, 1517.
6 M. J. Maciejewski, J. Macromol. Sci., Chem., 1982, 17, 689.
7 L. Liu and R. Breslow, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 12110.
8 T. M. Miller, T. X. Neenan, R. Zaya and H. E. Bair, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1992, 114, 1018.
9 F. Morgenroth, E. Reuther and K. Mu¨llen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1997, 36, 631.
10 M. Mu¨ller, C. Ku¨bel and K. Mu¨llen, Chem.–Eur. J., 1998, 4, 2099.
11 K. Harre and G. Wegner, Polymer, 2006, 47, 7312.
12 F. Jaiser, D. Neher, A. Meisel, H. G. Nothofer, T. Miteva, A. Herrmann,
K. Mu¨llen and U. Scherf, J. Chem. Phys., 2008, 129, 114901.
13 N. Krasteva, Y. Fogel, R. E. Bauer, K. Mu¨llen, Y. Joseph, N. Matsuzawa,
A. Yasuda and T. Vossmeyer, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2007, 17, 881.
14 M. Stemmler, F. D. Stefani, S. Bernhardt, R. E. Bauer, M. Kreiter,
K. Mu¨llen and W. Knoll, Langmuir, 2009, 25, 12425.
15 J. Sakamoto and K. Mu¨llen, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 4277.
16 S. Kobayashi, H. Uyama and S. Kimura, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 3793.
17 D. Tu¨rp, T. T. T. Nguyen, M. Baumgarten and K. Mu¨llen, New
J. Chem., 2012, 36, 282.
Next it was imperative to demonstrate the ability to cleave
the bond between the covalently bound molecules and PPDs
under reductive conditions. PPD 2 was reacted with dithiothreitol
(20 equivalents) in THF at 60 1C for 2 h to reduce the disulfide
18 R. E. Bauer, J. C. G. Clark and K. Mu¨llen, New J. Chem., 2007, 31, 1275.
19 T. T. T. Nguyen, D. Tu¨rp, D. Wang, B. Nolacher, F. Laquai and
K. Mu¨llen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 11194.
bonds, and thus release the guest species. The dendrimers were 20 K. Chiad, M. Grill, M. Baumgarten, M. Klapper and K. Mu¨llen,
Macromolecules, 2013, 46, 3554.
precipitated in methanol and purified by dialysis in THF for 24 h to
remove the nitrophenol derivatives. Fig. 1D shows the MALDI-TOF
´
21 W. Zhang, S. E. Tichy, L. M. Perez, G. C. Maria, P. A. Lindahl and
E. E. Simanek, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 5086.
spectrum of PPD 3 post-reduction with a [M/Z]exp = 5801.33 g molÀ1 22 G. Saito, J. A. Swanson and K. D. Lee, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 2003,
([M/Z]theor. = 5800.56 g molÀ1) that is 789 g molÀ1 less than PPD 2,
2, 199.
23 A. R. Frand, J. W. Cuozzo and C. A. Kaiser, Trends Cell Biol., 2000,
which correlates to the loss of the four nitrophenol derivatives.
10, 203.
1H NMR spectroscopy reveals the disappearance of the signals 24 H. F. Lodish and N. Kong, J. Biol. Chem., 1993, 268, 20598.
2036 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 2034--2036
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014