Page 3 of 4
Journal Name
ChemComm
DOI: 10.1039/C3CC48549H
[26380 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1]. Interestingly the LLCT transition in 2 is fourꢀ
times more intense than for 1 [877 nm, 55 160 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1]. This
enhancement may reflect the involvement of the coordinated
diaminobenzene bridge in the transition for 1. During electrolysis of
2 the 877 nm band disappeared at the expense of two intense
transitions at 410 [26 100 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1] and 494 nm [22 600 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1],
and a broad band at ca. 700 nm (Fig. 4b). The latter two bands
correspond to 12+ (Fig. 3c), whereas the former originates from the
oxidized free ligand (see ESI). These spectroscopic results again
diiminosemiquinonate bonds to allow for redoxꢀtriggered
ligand ejection, while keeping rebinding possible. The effect of
the pH and substituents on the process are currently
investigated in our laboratory.
This research has been funded by a grant from the University
Joseph Fourier (fond d’intervention) and the Labex ARCANE.
Notes and references
support
a
redoxꢀdriven ligand ejection, consistent with
Département de Chimie Moléculaire ꢀ Chimie Inorganique Redox (CIRE)
ꢀ UMR CNRS 5250, Université Joseph Fourier, B. P. 53, 38041 Grenoble
cedex 9, France.
electrochemical data.
Email : fabrice.thomas@ujfꢀgrenoble.fr
40
30
20
†
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: CCDCꢀ
927235ꢀ6, experimental procedures, EPR, NMR, UVꢀVis spectra and
cyclic voltammetry curves. See DOI: 10.1039/c000000x/
1
J. W. Canary, S. Mortezaei, J. Liang, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254
2249; K. W. Plaxco, H. T. Soh, Trends. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 1.
Y. L. Zhao, Z. Li, S. Kabehie, Y. Y. Botros, J. F. Stoddart, J. I. Zink,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13016.
B. Y. Ahn, E. B. Duoss, M. J. Motala, X. Guo, S. I. Park, Y. Xiong,
J. Yoon, R. G. Nuzzo, J. A. Rogers, J. A. Lewis, Science 2009, 232, 1590.
B. L. Feringa, Molecular Switches. WileyꢀVCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2001.
,
(a)
(b)
2
10
(c)
ε
3
0
400
600
800
1000
λ
/ nm
4
Figure 3. Vis-NIR spectra of (a)
CH2Cl2 (+ 0.1 M TBAP). T = 298 K.
1
, (b) 1+, (c) 12+. Concentrations = 0.5 mM in
5
S. Zahn, J. W. Canary, Science 2000, 288, 1404; B. Champin, P.
Mobian, J.ꢀP. Sauvage, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 358. G. Periyasamy, J.
P. Collin, J.ꢀP. Sauvage, F. Remacle, Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1310.
We monitored the reversibility of the system by applying to 2 the
required potential to eject one ligand (exhaustive electrolysis at
+0.21 V), and then a cathodic potential (ꢀ0.60 V). The VisꢀNIR
spectrum recorded just after electrolysis (Fig. 4c) was clearly
different than that of 2, with a maximum peak at 894 nm [18 460 Mꢀ1
cmꢀ1] and a shoulder at 950 nm. However, after 15 h the NIR band
has both shifted to 877 nm and increased in intensity (Fig. 4d),
giving spectral features reminiscent of 2. Thus, although the reaction
6
7
A. M. Allgeirer, C. A. Mirkin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 894.
For recent articles see: H. Li, A. C. Fahrenbach, A. Coskun, Z. Zhu,
G. Barin, Y. L. Zhao, Y. Y. Botros, J. P. Sauvage, J. F. Stoddart, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6782. A. Iordache, M. Oltean, A. Milet, F.
Thomas, B. Baptiste, E. SaintꢀAman, C. Bucher, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012,
134, 2653; G. Barin, M. Frasconi, S. M. Dyar, J. Iehl, O. Buyukcakir, A.
occurs slowly the ejected ligand can rebind the nickel ion after A. Sarjeant, R. Carmieli, A. Coskun, M. R. Wasielewski, J. F. Stoddart, J.
reduction (Scheme 3). [14]
Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2466.
8
S. M. Sembiring, S. B. Collbran, D. C. Craig, Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34,
761.
9
60
40
20
0
(d)
(a)
Z. He, S. B. Colbran, D. C. Craig, Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 116.
10 R. Hubner, S. Weber, S. Strobel, B. Sarkar, S. Zalis, W. Kaim,
Organometallics 2011, 30, 1414.
11 D. Herebian, E. Bothe, F. Neese, T. Weyhermüller, K. Wieghardt, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9116.
12 The electrochemically generated 1+ is paramagnetic (
(b)
(c)
ε
S
= 1/2). It
(c)
exhibits a slightly rhombic EPR signal at g1 = 1.994, g2 = 2.004, g3
=
2.021. These values are consistent with a main ligand radical character of
the singly occupied MO (M. Orio, O. Jarjayes, H. Kanso, C. Philouze, F.
Neese, F. Thomas, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4989).
400 600 800 1000 400 600 800 1000
λ
/ nm
Figure 4. Vis-NIR spectra of (a):
2
; (b): 2 after electrolysis at 0.21 V; (c-d): 2 after
electrolysis at 0.21 V followed by reduction at -0.60 V [(c) 5 min after reduction,
(d) after 30 min, 2 h and 15 h]. Arrows indicate spectral changes. Concentrations
= 0.25 mM in CH2Cl2 (+ 0.1 M TBAP). T = 298 K.
13 The NIR band of
1 and 2 is assigned to an IVCT transition involving
the peripherical ISQ moieties; It formally corresponds to the transfer of
an electron from one ISQ group to the other one, and could be formulated
as (ISQ)NiII(ISQ)→(phenylenediamine)NiII(IBQ); The NIR band of 1+
reflects the mixedꢀvalent character of this compound. It is ascribed to the
(ISQ)NiII(IBQ)→(IBQ)NiII(ISQ) transition. See ref. 11.
In conclusion we herein describe the first example of
electrochemically driven ejection of a redox hemilabile ligand
involving
intramolecular Hꢀbonds and the attenuated negative charge at
the terminal chelating atoms in labilize sufficiently the Mꢀ
diiminosemiquinonate
moieties.
Both
the
14 The potential of ꢀ0.60 V is not sufficient to reduce the oxidized free
ligand. The driving force for the conversion 12+
→ 2 is therefore not
2
electron transfer to the free ligand, but rather to the complex. This
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3