J.J. Stone et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 342 (2003) 236ꢂ
/240
237
2. Experimental
7.78 (broad m, 9H, Arꢀ
6.65ꢂ6.68 (m, 2H, ArꢀH), 5.05 (m, 4H, ꢁ
2.10ꢂ2.16 (m, 8H, ꢀCH2ꢀ
), 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3,
25 8C): d 19.2 (br s, JPtP nr).
/
H). 7.08ꢂ
/
7.13 (m, 2H, Arꢀ
/
H),
/
/
/
CHCH2ꢀ
/),
2.1. General considerations
/
/
/
1
ꢁ
/
All reactions were performed under a nitrogen atmo-
sphere on a vacuum line or in a nitrogen-filled drybox.
2.2.3. Synthesis of [PtCl2(P(C6H5)(C6H4Cl-2)2)2] (4)
A flask was charged with 1 (95 mg, 0.2 mmol),
[PtCl2(NCCH3)2] (50 mg, 0.14 mmol), and THF (10
ml). This solution was refluxed for 24 h during which
time a fine precipitate formed. After filtration a yellow
powder was obtained (67.8 mg, 52%). Anal. Calc. for
THF was distilled from sodiumꢂbenzophenone. Diethyl
/
ether was purified using a Grubbs-type solvent purifica-
tion system. Dichloromethane was dried over CaH2 and
distilled. Nitrogen was purified by passage through
purification columns (oxygen and moisture) from
Chromatography Research Supplies. [PdCl2(cod)]
C36H26Cl6P2Pt: C, 46.58; H, 2.82. Found: C, 46.19; H
1
(codꢁ/1,5-cyclooctadiene) [2], [PdCl2(NCCH3)2] [3]
2.93%. H NMR (CDCl3, 25 8C): d 7.22ꢂ
/
7.45 (broad,
H), 6.66ꢂ6.69
H). 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 25 8C): d
2832).
and [PtCl2(NCCH3)2] [4] were prepared as described
previously. P(C6H5)(C6H4Cl-2)2 (1) was prepared from
2-bromochlorobenzene in a manner similar to that
described in the literature [5]. [PtCl2(cod)] and
m, 18H, Arꢀ
/
H), 7.11ꢂ
/
7.13 (m, 4H, Arꢀ
/
/
(m, 4H, Arꢀ
/
1
19.14 (s, JPtP
ꢁ
/
[NiBr2(DME)] (DMEꢁ
/
CH3OCH2CH2OCH3), 2,2?-bi-
2.2.4. Reaction of [NiBr2(DME)] with 1
pyridine, 1,10-phenanthroline, and 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-
phenanthroline were obtained from Aldrich and used
as received. Elemental analyses were performed by
A flask was charged with [NiBr2(DME)] (50 mg, 0.162
mmol), 1 (107.3 mg, 0.325 mmol), and THF (10 ml). The
reaction was refluxed for 24 h. Upon removing the
solvent, a green solid was obtained. Analysis of the H
and 31P NMR spectra of the material revealed that no
uptake of 1 had occurred.
1
1
Midwest Microlabs. H (300 MHz) and 31P (121 MHz)
NMR spectra were taken using a Bruker ARX-300
instrument and referenced to Me4Si (0 ppm) and H3PO4
(85% aq. solution, 0 ppm), respectively. Quantitative
31P{1H} NMR spectra were obtained by turning off the
decoupler during the pulse and delay and setting d1 to
30 s. Coupling constants are in given in Hertz.
2.2.5. Treatment of 2 with Lewis bases
An NMR tube was charged with [PdCl2(cod)] (3 mg,
10 mmol), 1 (6.9 mg, 20 mmol), P(O)Ph3 (2.9 mg, 10.4
mmol; internal standard), Lewis base (20.8 mmol for
monodentate ligands; 10.4 mmol for bidentate ligands),
and CDCl3 (0.5 ml). The sample was heated to 90 8C
for 10 min in the sealed NMR tube. Due to the
insolubility of many of the products, the progress of
the reaction was monitored by the integration of the
internal standard P(O)Ph3 versus free 1. The results of
these experiments are summarized in Tables 3 and 4.
2.2. Reaction of MX2L2 with 1
2.2.1. Synthesis of trans-[PdCl2(P(C6H5)(C6H4Cl-
2)2)2] (2)
A flask was charged with [PdCl2(NCCH3)2] (100 mg,
0.39 mmol), 1 (260 mg, 0.79 mmol), CH2Cl2 (15 ml). The
reaction was stirred at 25 8C, and a cloudy yellowꢂ
/
orange solution was evident after 30 min. After 24 h a
fine yellow powder was obtained. After filtration and
washing with diethyl ether, the residue was dried under
vacuum to afford 300 mg (93%) of 2. Anal. Calc. for
2.2.6. Molecular structure determination of 2×
/
2CDCl3
A crystal suitable for X-ray diffraction studies was
grown by slow evaporation of a CDCl3 solution. The
data collection was performed using a Bruker SMART
C36H26Cl6P2Pd: C, 51.50; H, 3.12. Found: C, 52.20; H,
1
˚
diffractometer (Mo radiation, 0.71073 A) equipped with
3.68%. H NMR (CDCl3, 25 8C): d 7.10ꢂ
/
7.78 (broad
H). 31P{1H}
m, 22H, Arꢀ
/
H), 6.68ꢂ
/
6.70 (m, 4H, Arꢀ
/
a CCD detector at 218 K Preliminary cell determination
was done using a set of 45 narrow frames (0.38, 15 s
exposure). The data sets consisted of 4790 independent
reflections. Crystal data and structure refinement para-
meters are listed in Table 1. Structure solution and
refinement were carried out using the SHELXTL-PLUS
NMR (CDCl3, 25 8C): d 21.6. Similar results were
obtained using [PdCl2(cod)] (100 mg, 0.350 mmol) and 1
(232 mg, 0.700 mmol). A yellow solid was obtained from
this reaction (280 mg, 96%).
2.2.2. Synthesis of [PtCl2(cod)(P(C6H5)(C6H4Cl-
2)2)] (3)
A flask was charged with [PtCl2(cod)] (50.0 mg, 0.134
mmol), 1 (88.5 mg, 0.268 mmol), and THF (10 ml). The
reaction was refluxed for 24 h. After filtration and
drying under vacuum, a yellow solid was obtained.
software package [6]. The Cꢀ
/
Cl bond distances were
restrained to be within 0.05 deviation, while the thermal
parameters of the chlorines were restrained to be similar.
Due to partially twinned crystals, it was not possible to
obtain a reasonable solution from SMART. The triclinic
cell suggested by SMART resulted in extremely poor data
reduction parameters and no chemically reasonable
solution could be obtained based on this cell. Therefore,
Anal. Calc. for C26H25Cl4PPt: C, 44.27; H, 3.54. Found:
1
C, 44.30; H, 3.68%. H NMR (CDCl3, 25 8C): d 7.22ꢂ
/