5
With the enantio pure 2 in hand, the synthesis of crizotinib can
be completed by the route shown in Scheme 1. The synthesis
started with 2-aminopyridin-3-ol (3), which is commercial
available. 3 reacted with bis(trichloromethyl)carbonate (BTC) to
give oxazole compound 7 in 86% yield, in which both amino and
hydroxy groups were protected. Bromination of 7 occurred
regioselectively by reacting with bromine at 0-30 oC to give
bromide 8 as the main product in 88% yield. Hydrolysis of 8 in
boronate intermediate 4 in 80% yield as the white solid. While
using 2-isopropoxy-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (16)
for the coupling reaction, the target compound 4 could also be
obtained in 60% yield. (Scheme 3)
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a new approach for the
asymmetric synthesis of Crizotinib (1) with high
enantioselectivity. The key step of this approach is the
asymmetric synthesis of chiral alcohol (S)-1-(2,6-dichloro-3-
fluorophenyl)ethanol 2 through asymmetric hydrogenation of
ketone precursor 6 by using highly efficient and enantioselective
Ir[(R)-DTB-SpiroPAP-3-Me] (5) as catalyst. The asymmetric
hydrogenation was practiced in the pilot plant at 100 kg scale and
2 could be obtained in 99.5% ee with TON of 100,000,15 which
further proves highly efficiency of this type of the catalyst in
producing chiral alcohols.16
o
10% NaOH solution at 100 C to give 9 in 90% yield, followed
by the protection of amino group by Boc group to afford 10 in
75% yield. After coupling of 10 and 2 under Mitsunobu
condition, intermediate 11 could be isolated in 50% yield. Suzuki
coupling of intermediate 11 with boronate
4 by using
Pd(Ph3P)2Cl2 as catalyst in DMF at 60 oC for 3 h, to give Di-Boc
protected compound 12 in 85% yield. Finally, removal of Boc
groups of 12 with HCl in ethanol to produce crizotinib (1) in 87%
yield with 99.5 % ee. It was noted that no racemization occurred
during the above transformation.
References and Notes
1. a) Zou, H. Y.; Li, Q.; Lee, J. H.; Arango, M. E.; McDonnell,
S. R.; Yamazaki, S.; Koudriakova, T. B.; Alton, G.; Cui, J.
J.; Kung, P.-P.; Nambu, M. D.; Los, G.; Bender, S. L.;
Mroczkowski, B.; Christensen, J. G. Cancer Res. 2007, 67,
4408–4417; b) Siegel, R.; Naishadham, D.; Jemal, A. CA
Cancer J. Clin. 2012, 62, 10–29.
2. Coleman, M. P.; Alexe, D-M.; Albreht, T.; McKee, M
(Eds). Responding to the Challenge of Cancer in Europe,
Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia,
Slovenia, 2008.
3. a) Hallberg, B.; Palmer, R. H. New Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363,
1760–1762; b) Kwak, E.; Bang, Y.; Camidge, R. et al. New
Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 1693–1703; c) Christensen, J. G.;
Zou, H. Y.; Arango, M. E. et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007, 6,
3314–3322; (d) Bergethon, K.; Shaw, A. T.; Ignatious Ou,
S. H. et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012, 30, 863–870.
Scheme 2. Original synthetic route of 4 from iodo compound 13. Reaction
conditions: (a) 14, Pd(Ph3P)2Cl2, KOAc, DMSO, 80 oC, 2 h; (b) 15, 2 M i-
PrMgCl in THF, 0-30 oC.
4. Mathre, D. J.; Thompson, A. S.; Douglas, A. W.;
Hoogsteen, K.; Carroll, J. D.; Corley, E. G.; Grabowski, E.
J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2880–2888.
5. Brown, H. C.; Chandrasekharan, J.; Ramachandran, P.V. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1539–1546.
6. Jiang, B.; Feng, Y.; Zheng, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
10281–10283.
7. Martinez, C. A.; Keller, E.; Meijer, R.; Metselaar, G.;
Kruithof, G.; Moore, C.; Kung, P. -P. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 2010, 21, 2408-2412.
8. a) Kung, P.-P; Martinez, C. A.; Tao, J. Pat. Appl. WO
2006/021885 A1, 2006. b) Liang, J.; Jenne, S. J.; Mundorff,
E.; Ching, C.; Gruber, J. M.; Krebber, A.; Huisman, G. W.
Pat. Appl. WO 2009/036404 A2, 2009.
9. De Koning, P. D.; McAndrew, D.; Moore, R.; Moses, I. B.;
Boyles, D. C.; Kissick, K. et al. Org. Process. Res. Dev.
2011, 15, 1018–1026.
Scheme 3. Synthetic route of 4 through bromide 18. Reaction conditions: (a)
o
MsCl, Et3N, MTBE, 0-30 oC, 1 h, 95 %; (b) 19, NaH, DMF, 0 C, 2 h; (ii) 18,
o
o
100 C, 12 h, 55 %; (c) (i) i-PrMgCl·LiCl in THF, 20–30 C, 12 h; (ii) 15 (or
16), THF, 20–30 oC, 6 h, 60–80 %.
10. Knowles, W.S.; Noyori, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40,
1238-1239. For a pharmaceutical process, TON of the
catalysts > 20,000 will be acceptable, as the cost of the
catalysts can be neglected and recovery of catalysts will be
not necessary.
11. a) Doucet, H.; Ohkuma, T.; Murata, K.; Yokozawa, T.;
Kozawa, M.; Katayama, E.; England, A. F.; Ikariya, T.;
Noyori, R. Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 1792–1796; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1703–1707; b) Blaser, H.-U.;
Buser, H. P.; Goers, K.; Hanreich, R.; Jelett, H. P.; Jelsch,
E.; Pugin, B.; Schneider, H. D.; Spindler, F.; Wegmann, A.
Chimia 1999, 53, 275–280; c) Blaser, H.-U. Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2002, 344, 17–31.
In addition, another key intermediate boronate
4 was
previously prepared from the corresponding iodide 13. The
general route can be divided in two classes: Pd-catalyzed
boronation of 13 with pinacol boronate 14,14 or Knochel
procedure of i-PrMgCl assisted coupling reaction of 13 with
pinacol boronate 15 (Scheme 2).9 However, the cost of iodo
compound normally is considered much higher than its bromo
derivatives in process perspective, and in most of the cases of
using iodo compounds for the reaction, the color would be
contained in the product, which needs extra cost for the
purification. As shown in Scheme 3, synthesis of pinacol
boronate intermediate 4 started from pipradrol (17), which was
transformed to its mesylate 18 in 95% yield. Reaction of the
mesylate 18 with 4-bromopyrazole (19), which was previously
deprotonated by sodium hydride, and heating in DMF to give 20
in 55% yield. Reaction of 20 with i-PrMgCl·LiCl generated the
expected Grignard reagent, which was quenched with 2-
methoxy-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (15) to yield
12. Other examples of asymmetric hydrogenation of
acetophonone with TONs as high as 1,000,000, see: a) Hu.
A. G.; Ngo. H. L.; Lin, W. B. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2937–
2940; b) Li, W.; Sun, X.; Zhou, L.; Hou, G.; Yu, S.; Zhang,
X. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1397–1399.