Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 6519−6521
Preventing Nitrite Contamination in Tetramethylammonium Peroxynitrite
Solutions
Petr Latal,† Reinhard Kissner,† D. Scott Bohle,‡ and Willem H. Koppenol*,†
Laboratorium fu¨r Anorganische Chemie, Departement Chemie und Angewandte Biowissenschaften,
ETH-Ho¨nggerberg, Zu¨rich, Switzerland, and Department of Chemistry, McGill UniVersity,
Montreal, Canada
Received June 28, 2004
Peroxynitrite prepared from superoxide and nitric oxide in liquid
ammonia does not contain detectable levels of nitrite. However,
the dissolution of nitrite salts can lead to variable levels of
peroxynitrite depending on the conditions used to disolve the salt.
Low levels of nitrite result when frozen peroxynitrite solutions are
Peroxynitrite decomposition yields nitrite and dioxygen
in a 2:1 ratio,4 and the yields of these products, relative to
peroxynitrite, can provide information about the mechanism
of decomposition. Generally, frozen stock solutions are
melted and warmed to 0,5 25,6,7 or 37 °C4 and then mixed
with varying concentrations of phosphoric acid at the
appropriate temperature to obtain different pH values at 25
or 37 °C, followed by a nitrite determination. If nitrite is
already generated by the warming process and if the
concentration of nitrite is a function of the time that the stock
solution is kept at a particular temperature, then this would
complicate the analysis, even if a determination is made at
low pH some time after the stock solution has melted. This
issue of nitrite generation in the alkaline solution needs to
be resolved for progress to be made on the mechanistic front.
Herein, we demonstrate how, through warming above 0
°C, alkaline (0.01 M potassium hydroxide) stock solutions
can become heavily contaminated with nitrite, and we
describe the steps that should be followed to avoid this
problem.
The tetramethylammonium peroxynitrite used in these
studies was prepared by treating tetramethylammonium
superoxide with nitrogen monoxide at -77 °C in liquid
ammonia, followed by isolation as a crystalline solid via
removal of the ammonia. From combustion analysis, this
solid corresponds to (NMe4)(O3N); contamination with as
little as 6.6% (NMe4)(NO2) would significantly alter these
figures.8-10 Clearly, the C, H, and N analyses alone are not
consistent with 20% contamination with nitrite. Greater
precision might be possible when oxygen analysis is included
first brought to
undergo only 2
findings of a recent report (Lymar, S. V.; Khairutdinov, R. F.; Hurst,
J. K. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 5259 5266), where high levels of
nitrite ( 20%) result from rapid thawing of these solutions to room
+1
°
C and then to room temperature. These
−3% decomposition after 1 h, in contrast with the
−
∼
temperature. Warming the frozen peroxynitrite solution directly to
room temperature in 30 min leads to a nitrite level of 28%.
The mechanism of peroxynitrite [systematic name: oxo-
peroxonitrate(1-)] decomposition has been intensively stud-
ied and vigorously debated in the past decade. Among the
critical mechanistic issues are the reaction products, which
include nitrite and dioxygen when the initial concentration
of peroxynitrite is high.
ONOOH + ONOO- f 2NO2- + O2 + H+
(1)
In a recent paper on the thermodynamics of peroxynitrous
acid, Hurst and co-workers1 criticized our model to describe
the formation of nitrite and dioxygen and claimed that their
high-pressure studies support homolysis. Furthermore, these
authors mention that the peroxynitrite supplied by us
contained 20% nitrite. Whereas the first two points have
already been addressed,2,3 the origin of the nitrite contamina-
tion needs to be scrutinized carefully.
(4) Pfeiffer, S.; Gorren, A. C. F.; Schmidt, K.; Werner, E. R.; Hansert,
B.; Bohle, D. S.; Mayer, B. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 3465-3470.
(5) Kissner, R.; Koppenol, W. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 234-
239.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: koppenol@
inorg.chem.ethz.ch.
(6) Coddington, J. W.; Hurst, J. K.; Lymar, S. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 2438-2443.
† ETH-Ho¨nggerberg.
‡ McGill University.
(7) Kirsch, M.; Korth, H.-G.; Wensing, A.; Sustmann, R.; De Groot, H.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003, 418, 133-150.
(1) Lymar, S. V.; Khairutdinov, R. F.; Hurst, J. K. Inorg. Chem. 2003,
42, 5259-5266.
(8) Bohle, D. S.; Hansert, B.; Paulson, S. C.; Smith, B. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 7423-7424.
(2) Kissner, R.; Nauser, T.; Kurz, C.; Koppenol, W. H. IUBMB Life 2003,
55, 567-572.
(9) Bohle, D. S.; Glassbrenner, P. A.; Hansert, B. Methods Enzymol. 1996,
269, 302-311.
(3) Kissner, R.; Thomas, C.; Hamsa, M. S. A.; van Eldik, R.; Koppenol,
W. H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 11261-11263.
(10) Bohle, D. S.; Sagan, E. S. Inorg. Synth. 2004, 34, 36-41.
10.1021/ic049161k CCC: $27.50
Published on Web 09/17/2004
© 2004 American Chemical Society
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 43, No. 21, 2004 6519