MedChemComm
Concise Article
The indole derivatives with 3-pyridyl carbamate residues
(52 and 54) were synthesized with the latter method utilizing
3-pyridyl chloroformate, synthesized from diphosgene and
pyridin-3-ol, instead of phenyl chloroformate in the last step
(Scheme 2).
Inhibition of FAAH hydrolase by the test compounds was
determined with an assay using microsomes from rat brain as
enzyme source and N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-pyren-1-ylbutanamide
as uorogenic substrate.23 Inhibitory potencies of the tested
compounds were assessed by comparing the amount of 4-pyren-
1-ylbutanoic acid released from the substrate in their absence
and presence aer an incubation time of 60 min by reversed-
phase HPLC with uorescence detection (see ESI†). With this
assay for the diphenylimidazole 2 an IC50 of 0.35 mM was
measured (Table 1). Replacement of the imidazole scaffold of 2
by a pyrrole (9) led to an about sevenfold loss of activity.
Shortening of the alkyl chain connecting the carbamate group
and the pyrrole heterocycle from six to four and two carbon
atoms further decreased inhibitory potency. With an IC50 of 6.2
mM the butyl derivative 13 was only about half as active as the
hexyl compound 9. The derivative with an ethyl linker (15) even
was inactive at the highest test concentration of 10 mM. Because
removing of the methyl group in position 2 of the imidazole ring
of 2 did not change the activity of the compound,24 the impact of
the corresponding methyl group of the pyrrole 9 on inhibitory
potency was not examined.
Fig.
inhibitor 6.
2 Structure of the dual cyclooxygenase–5-lipoxygenase
Introduction of polar ethoxycarbonyl, acetyl and cyano
substituents at the free position of the pyrrole ring of 9 was also
detrimental. The inhibition values of obtained compounds 18,
21 and 24 were in the magnitude of 10 mM (Table 2). Interest-
ingly, moving the phenyl group from position 3 to position 4 of
the pyrrole ring, to give compound 27, as well as completely
removing the phenyl ring, to give compound 30, signicantly
increased FAAH inhibition. The activity of these two inhibitors
was comparable to that of the diphenylimidazole 2.
Similar results were obtained with analogous indole deriva-
tives (Table 3). With IC50 values of about 5 mM the 2,3-dipheny-
lindole 32 and the 3-phenylindole 34 possessed the lowest potency
of the series. The 2-phenylindole 36 was about tenfold more active
than the 3-phenylderivative 34. Thus, a phenyl substituent is
much better tolerated in position 2 than in position 3 of the indole
scaffold. The indole derivative 38, which has no phenyl-substitu-
ents in 2- and 3-position, possessed the highest activity (IC50
0.25 mM) showing that phenyl substituents are even unfavourable.
Scheme 1 Reagents and conditions: (a) tert-butyl-N-(6-bromohexyl)-
carbamate–tert-butyl-N-(2-bromoethyl)carbamate, K-tert-butylate,
DMSO, 60/80 ꢀC; (b) (1) trifluoroacetic acid, CH2Cl2, 0 ꢀC; (2) phenyl
chloroformate, triethylamine, CH2Cl2, room temp.; (c) 1,4-dibromo-
butane, tetrabutylammonium bromide, toluene, 50% aqueous NaOH,
45 ꢀC; (d) potassium phthalimide, DMF, 130 ꢀC; (e) (1) hydrazine-
hydrate, ethanol, reflux; (2) phenyl chloroformate, triethylamine,
CH2Cl2, room temp.; (f) N-(6-bromohexyl)phthalimide, K-tert-buty-
late, DMSO, 50/70 ꢀC; (g) (1) hydrazine-hydrate, ethanol, reflux; (2)
phenyl chloroformate, triethylamine, CH2Cl2, 0 ꢀC to room temp.
The related derivatives with indole, indazole, imidazole and
benzotriazole heterocycle were prepared similarly to Method C
of Scheme 1 using K-tert-butylate–DMSO, NaH–DMSO, NaH–
DMF, K2CO3–DMSO and K2CO3–acetonitrile, respectively, for
the N-alkylation of the appropriate heterocycle with N-(u-bro-
moalkyl)phthalimide.22
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: (a) N-(u-bromoalkyl)phthali-
mide, NaH, DMSO, 100 ꢀC; (b) (1) hydrazine-hydrate, ethanol, reflux, 2
h; (2) trichloromethyl chloroformate, pyridin-3-ol, ethyl(diisopropyl)-
amine, CH2Cl2, THF, – 30 ꢀC to room temp.
Med. Chem. Commun.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014