KARUNAKAR, KUMAR
1938
Table 3. One-pot three- and four-component syntheses of compounds 4a–4f
Three-component synthesis [8]
Four-component synthesis (this work)
Comp. no.
Ar
reaction time, h yield,a %
mp, °C [8]
reaction time, h
yield, %
mp, °C
4a
Ph
1
85
83
80
85
82
80
138–140
180–182
140–142
160–162
180–182
178–180
1
85
87
83
80
86
82
139–141
181–182
141–143
162–163
181–183
178–180
4b
4-MeC6H4
4-MeOC6H4
4-O2NC6H4
2-MeC6H4
4-ClC6H4
1
1
4c
1
1
4d
1.5
1.5
1.5
1
4e
4f
1.5
2
a
Crude product.
hyde 2 was added to the reaction mixture which was
maintained at the same temperature for 30 min; as
a result, intermediate 7 was obtained (TLC). Malono-
nitrile (3) was then added, and the mixture was heated
again for 60 min to afford target compound 4.
Compounds 4a–4f were identified by comparing their
zide (5, 1 mmol), aromatic aldehyde 2a–2f (1 mmol),
and malononitrile (3, 1 mmol) in ethanol (20 mL) was
refluxed for 1.0–2.0 h. The progress of the reaction was
monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction,
the mixture was poured into cold water (60 mL), and
the precipitate was filtered off, washed with 1 M so-
dium bicarbonate solution (3 × 50 mL) and water
(50 mL), and dried at 50–55°C for 10–12 h. The yields,
reaction times, and melting points of compounds 4a–4f
are given in Table 3. The products had identical melting
points and spectroscopic characteristics with those
described in [8].
1
melting points and spectral characteristics (IR, H and
13C NMR, and mass spectra) with those reported in [8]
(Table 3).
In summary, we have successfully adapted a simple
one-pot green procedure for the synthesis of 2-amino-
4-aryl-6-[1,4-dioxo-3,4-dihydrophthalazin-2(1H)-yl]-
4H-pyran-3,5-dicarbonitriles via four-component con-
densation. The procedure is advantageous due to easy
workup, short reaction times, good yields, and the use
of ethanol as a green solvent. Furthermore, it is superior
to the three-component synthesis reported previously
[8] since it involves one step less, does not require
external catalyst, and ensures comparable or higher
yields in the same (or shorter time).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are thankful to GVK Biosciences Private
Limited (IDA Nacharam, Hyderabad, Telangana, India) and
Division of Chemistry, Department of Sciences and
Humanities, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology &
Research University (Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh,
India) for providing facilities to perform this study.
EXPERIMENTAL
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
No conflict of interest is declared by the authors.
REFERENCES
The melting points were determined in open capil-
lary tubes in a sulfuric acid bath. Thin-layer chromatog-
raphy was run on silica gel G, and visualization was
done with iodine or UV light. The IR spectra were
recorded in KBr using a Perkin Elmer 1000 instrument.
1. Strecker, A., Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1850,
vol. 75, p. 27.
2. Toure, B.B. and Hall, D.G., Chem. Rev., 2009, vol. 109,
p. 4439.
The H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on
1
a Bruker Avance III spectrometer at 400 and 100 MHz,
respectively, using DMSO-d6 as solvent and tetra-
methylsilane as internal standard. The mass spectra
were recorded on an Agilent LC/MS instrument.
One-pot synthesis of 2-amino-4-aryl-6-[1,4-di-
oxo-3,4-dihydrophthalazin-2(1H)-yl]-4H-pyran-3,5-
dicarbonitriles 4a–4f (general procedure). A mixture
of phthaloyl dichloride (6, 1 mmol), 2-cyanoacetohydra-
3. Handbook of Combinatorial Chemistry: Drugs, Catalysts,
Materials, Nicolaou, K.C., Hanko, R., and Hartwig, W.,
Eds., Weinheim: Wiley, 2002.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 55 No. 12 2019