Communication
unit to the aldehyde at the C-11 position of an intermediate.
The required aldehyde A could be obtained by oxidation of
the corresponding hydroxy group at the C-11 position of the
intermediate B, which would also be a promising intermediate
for tetrodotoxin. In order to synthesize the b-hydroxy amino
acid of chiriquitoxin stereoselectively, we selected a d-cam-
phor-derived tricycloiminolactone 3 as a chiral glycine equiva-
lent, because a highly anti-selective aldol reaction with alde-
hyde was reported by Xu and co-workers.[21] The intermediate
B was envisaged to arise from C by oxidative cleavage of the
acetylenic moiety to carboxylic acid and subsequent orthoester
formation. According to the previous synthetic studies in this
laboratory, the acetylene C would be synthesized from vinylep-
oxide D through ozonolysis of the vinyl group followed by ste-
reoselective addition of acetylide as a carboxylic acid equiva-
lent. The oxygen functionalities of D would be installed
through hydroxylation at the C-5 position by allylic oxidation
and subsequent epoxidation from compound 4,[19] a new inter-
mediate possessing two hydroxy groups at the C-8 and C-11
positions for tetrodotoxin and its analogues.
Synthesis began with inversion of the configuration of the
hydroxy group at the C-8 position of the intermediate 4
(Scheme 2). Protection of the primary alcohol with a TBS group
and oxidation with PCC gave enone, which was reduced with
LiAlH4 in ether as a solvent at approximately À110 8C, giving
the desired allylic alcohol 5 in good yield with high stereose-
lectivity (d.r.>20:1).[22] Protection of the resulting alcohol with
a TBS group provided 6. Allylic oxidation at the C-5 position
was next investigated. Upon heating of the bis-TBS ether 6
with SeO2 and pyridine N-oxide in 1,4-dioxane,[10b–c] the desired
allylic alcohol 8 was obtained in 15% yield along with an a,b-
unsaturated aldehyde in 80% yield. Further experiments re-
vealed that the regioselectivity depended on the protective
group of the hydroxy group at the C-11 position.[23] In the
event, the acetate 7 was found to be the best substrate for
the allylic oxidation under the conditions, providing the de-
sired 9 in 52% yield with the unsaturated aldehyde in 22%
yield. Then, 9 was transformed into bis-TBS ether 8 in two
steps because the acetyl group was not compatible for the
subsequent reactions.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of diacetate 14: a) TBSCl, imidazole, DMF, 08C, 15 min,
96%; b) PCC, 4 ꢁ MS, CH2Cl2, RT, 12 h, 89%; c) LiAlH4, Et2O, ca. À110 8C, 0.5 h,
73%; d) TBSOTf, 2,6-lutidine, CH3CN, À108C, 10 min, 95%; e) HF·Py, pyridine,
THF, À208C, 5 h; f) Ac2O, pyridine, RT, 1 h, 86% in 2 steps; g) SeO2, PNO, 1,4-
dioxane, 1008C, 34 h, 52%; h) K2CO3, MeOH, RT, 30 min; i) TBSOTf, 2,6-luti-
dine, CH2Cl2, À208C, 0.5 h, 99% in 2 steps; j) MCPBA, (CH2Cl)2, RT, 19 h, 88%;
k) PMBOC(=NH)CCl3, TfOH, Et2O, 08C, 0.5 h, 86%; l) O3, CH2Cl2, À788C, 5 h,
then Me2S; m) trimethylsilylacetylene, nBuLi, THF, À208C, 0.5 h, 80% in
2 steps; n) Ac2O, pyridine, RT, 2.5 h; o) TBAF, MeOH, THF, À208C, 15 min,
95% in 2 steps; p) DDQ, CH2Cl2, H2O, RT, 4 h, 93%; q) PCC, MS-4 ꢁ, CH2Cl2,
RT, 12 h, 87%; r) NaBH4, MeOH, À208C, 0.5 h; s) Ac2O, pyridine, DMAP, RT,
11 h, 94% in 2 steps. TBS=tert-butyldimethylsilyl, PCC=pyridinium chloro-
chromate, MS=molecular sieves, Tf=trifluoromethanesulfonyl, Py=pyri-
dine, THF=tetrahydrofuran, Ac=acetyl, PNO=pyridine N-oxide, MCPBA=3-
chloroperbenzoic acid, PMB=p-methoxybenzyl, TBAF=tetrabutylammoni-
um fluoride, DDQ=2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone, DMAP=N,N-
dimethyl-4-aminopyridine.
Epoxidation of 8 with MCPBA and subsequent protection of
the secondary alcohol as a PMB ether gave 10. The vinyl group
was ozonolyzed to afford an aldehyde, which was subjected to
addition of trimethylsilylacetylene as a carboxylic acid equiva-
lent. The aldehyde reacted with the lithium acetylide in THF at
À208C to give a 10:1 diastereomeric mixture, from which the
desired product 11 was isolated in 80% yield in two steps
from 10.[24] Acetylation followed by selective desilylation of the
TMS group afforded propargyl acetate 12. At this stage, the
configuration of the hydroxy group at the C-5 position of 12
was inverted by an oxidation–reduction sequence; deprotec-
tion of the PMB group with DDQ was followed by oxidation
with PCC to give ketone 13. Reduction with NaBH4 provided
a single alcohol, which was isolated as a diacetate 14 in 94%
yield in two steps.
through epoxide opening was next investigated. Oxidation of
14 was best carried out by RuCl3·nH2O and Oxone[25] to give
a mixture of the desired lactone 15 and a-ketocarboxylic acid
16 (Scheme 3).[26] Without purification, the mixture was treated
with alkaline hydrogen peroxide to give the desired carboxylic
acid, which underwent spontaneous opening of the epoxide
to afford an equilibrium mixture of lactones and orthoester.
The mixture was further treated with TIPSOTf in the presence
of 2,6-lutidine to provide the desired orthoester 17 in 68%
overall yield in three steps from 14. To cleave the 1,2-glycol
protected as an acetonide, deprotection of the acetonide was
attempted. Although the selective deprotection in the pres-
ence of acid-sensitive protective groups such as siloxy groups
was difficult, we fortunately found that 17 was treated with
With multigram quantities of 14 in hand, oxidative cleavage
of the acetylenic moiety and subsequent lactone formation
Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 1247 – 1251
1248
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim