N. Al-Maharik et al. / Tetrahedron 70 (2014) 4626e4630
4627
Fig. 1. Target liquid crystalline (LC) candidates with 2e6 containing the difluoro threo-vicinal motif.
2. Results and discussion
particularly relative to analogue 3, to determine the influence of the
fluorine atoms on the LC properties. The synthesis route to 6 is il-
lustrated in Scheme 2. In this case allylic alcohol 10 was hydroge-
nated to generate alcohol 18, and the alcohol was then subjected to
etherification with phenol 12c, to generate 6. An analytically pure
sample was also prepared by semi-preparative HPLC for LC prop-
erty analysis.
The properties of the prepared compounds 1e6 were assessed
for their LC characteristics, and the data is summarised in Table 1.
The liquid crystals 1e6 do not show any mesophases. This is also
reflected in the low virtual clearing temperatures, which are all
below ꢀ10 ꢂC. However, the melting points of the
difluoropropyleneoxy-linked materials 1e5 are all significantly
higher (>53 ꢂC) than for the non-fluorinated propyl-ether linked
compound 6 (33 ꢂC). This is an indication of fluorine-induced in-
termolecular electrostatic interactions, stabilising the crystal
lattice.
The target LCs 1e6 have a common general structure. They all
possess a propyl-cyclohexyl motif linked through the propyl chain
to a phenol ether. For structures 2e6, the difluorovicinal motif was
introduced by conversion of an epoxide ring in intermediates
13aee by sequential stereospecific conversion of the original
epoxide CeO bonds to CeF bonds.15,16 Thus epoxides 13aee
were key intermediates. They were prepared by the Hor-
nereWordswortheEmmons reaction of cyclohexylaldehyde 7 and
phosphonate 8.17 The resultant (E)-
a,b-unsaturated ester 9 formed
as a 1:4 mixture of isomers due to the configuration of substituents
across the cyclohexyl ring. This isomeric ratio could be improved by
epimerisation to a 1:9 ratio after treatment of 9 with base (KOH/
EtOH)18 (Scheme 1).
Reduction to allylic alcohol 10 was straightforward, and then
epoxidation with m-CPBA generated epoxy alcohol 11, which was
isolated as a single diastereoisomer after chromatography. Epoxy
alcohol 11 served as a common intermediate to the vicinal
difluorinated LC targets 2e6. At this stage it was treated with
a series of different phenols, 12aee under conditions described
previously6 to generate ethers 13aee. The epoxide functionality of
13aee was then taken through to the corresponding vicinal
difluoro motifs in a three step protocol.7,9 This involved epoxide
ring opening with Et3N$3HF, to give a mixture of fluorohydrin
regio-isomers, namely 14aee and 15aee. These reactions did not
show any particular selectivity and the regio-isomers were gener-
ally formed in 1:1 ratios. Regio-isomers 14aed were purified by
chromatography whereas regio-isomer 14e was inseparable from
15e, and in that case both isomers were treated together to gen-
erate a mixture of 16e and 17e. Compounds 14aed were obtained
after two rounds of chromatography and were converted to their
corresponding triflates 16aed. The triflates were then treated,
without further purification, with Et3N$3HF (65 ꢂC) to generate the
desired vicinal difluoro products 1e5. This protocol displayed
complete stereointegrity, and only the threo-vicinal difluoro iso-
mers were formed. On the other hand, when trifates 17a, 17c and
17e generated from regio-isomers 15a, 15c and 15e were subjected
to identical fluorination conditions, these substrates gave complex
rearrangement product mixtures. The products were not charac-
terised, but the presence of significant levels of fluoromethyl
groups was obvious in the 19F NMR spectra of the product mixtures.
Samples of each of the difluoro ethers 1e5 derived from 16aed,
were further purified by preparative HPLC, such that analytically
pure samples (w400 mg) were available for LC property analyses.
The non-fluorinated analogue 6 was also prepared. This was
required such that it could be assessed as a comparative compound,
Compound 1 is distinct in that it does not carry a polar terminal
group, therefore, the dielectric anisotropy of 1 is mainly caused by
the electronegative threo-difluoro motif in the linker. This moder-
ate negative dielectric anisotropy (
D 3 virt) indicates that the overall
molecular dipole moment is oriented in a perpendicular manner
relative to the long molecular axis, as is well known for other liquid
crystals with a vicinal-difluoroalkylene subunit.4 In the case of
compounds 2 and 5, the polar fluorine substituents on the aromatic
head groups twist the overall dipole moment more in line with the
long molecular axis, rendering liquid crystal 2 dielectrically nearly
neutral in spite of the presence of seven electronegative hetero-
atoms. This indicates that the angle between the overall dipole
moment vector and the director of the nematic phasedapproxi-
mated by the long molecular axisdis around 53ꢂ, where
D 3 be-
comes zero, independent from the molecular dipole moment.5 In
contrast, compounds 3, 4 and 6 with a 2,3-difluorophenyl head
group show strong negative dielectric anisotropy. In general 1-
alkoxy-2,3-difluorobenzenes prefer an anti arrangement of the
arylealkoxy bond by about 10:1 over the syn conformation, which
is reflected nicely in the crystal structure of 4.6 A comparison be-
tween 3 and 6 allows some conclusions to be drawn on the pre-
ferred conformation; the virtual clearing point of 3 is 18.1 K higher
than that of the analogue 6 with the non-fluorinated linker. This
can be seen as evidence for the conformational rigidification of the
linker group by threo-difluorination.
Unexpectedly, the comparison of the dielectric anisotropies of 3
(
D
3
¼ꢀ5.69) and 6 (
D
3
¼ꢀ5.77) are very similar. A closer look at
virt
virt
the crystal structure of 3 suggests a rationale assuming this is
a highly populated conformer in the LC phase; the all-gauche
conformation around the fluorine and oxygen atoms in the linear