ꢁꢁꢁꢂ
90ꢀ ꢀJ. Zakrzewski and M. Krawczyk: Alkanoic acid derivatives bearing a nitroxyl moiety
R
acidified with 1 N hydrochloric acid to pH 2. The acidified aqueous
layer was extracted with dichloromethane (3 ꢀ× ꢀ 20 mL). The extract
was dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered and concen-
trated. The residue was subjected to silica gel chromatography eluting
with benzene/methanol (9:1) to give product 3a–e as red oils.
OH
O
COOH
R
2a-e
COOH
Br
N
O
N
O
NaH, THF
1
3a-e
[(1-Oxyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)oxy]acetic
acid
(3a)ꢀYield 51%; IR (ν, cm-1, film): 2977, 2938 (C-H, stretch), 1737 (Cꢀ= ꢀO,
stretch), 1177, 1123 (C-O, stretch); EI MS: m/z 277 (4), 231 (7), 230 (7,
M+), 216 (100), 200 (40), 160 (6), 143 (18), 140 (87), 129 (11), 124 (51),
109 (19), 108 (28), 107 (34), 102 (33), 98 (39), 85 (61), 84 (21), 83 (20),
82 (22), 81 (25), 74 (28), 71 (91), 69 (27), 67 (28), 58 (43), 57 (29), 56
(44), 55 (59), 45 (23), 43 (57), 42 (57), 41 (97); ESI MS: m/z 230 (15, M-·),
229 (100, [M-H]-), 171 (5); HR ESI MS. Calcd for C11H19NO4 ([M-H]-): m/z
229.1314, found: m/z 229.1325.
a: R = H
b: R = Me
c: R = Et
d: R = C14H29
e: R = Ph
Scheme 1ꢀSynthesis of alkanoic acid derivatives bearing a nitroxyl
moiety 3a–e.
Table 1ꢁAntifungal activity of 3a–e at a concentration of 200 ppm.
No.ꢂ
Botrytisꢂ
Fusariumꢂ
Phytophthoraꢂ
Rhizoctonia 2-[(1-Oxyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)oxy]propanoic acid
solani (3b)ꢀYield 46%; IR (ν, cm-1, film): 3395, 2976, 2950 (C-H, stretch), 1732
cinerea
culmorum
cactorum
(Cꢀ= ꢀO, stretch), 1460 (CH3, bend), 1365 (CH2, CH3, bend), 1178, 1120,
3a ꢃ
3b ꢃ
3c ꢃ
3e ꢃ
32ꢃ
32ꢃ
36ꢃ
24ꢃ
44ꢃ
46ꢃ
34ꢃ
40ꢃ
9ꢃ
16ꢃ
100ꢃ
29ꢃ
0
1065 (C-O, stretch); EI MS: m/z 244 (4, M+), 230 (2), 172 (2), 157 (4), 154
20
(4), 149 (7), 143 (6), 140 (6), 139 (6), 124 (13), 109 (16), 98 (11), 85 (37),
0
26
71 (100), 69 (18), 57 (27), 56 (20), 55 (29), 45 (29), 43 (68), 42 (41), 41
(93); ESI MS: m/z 311 (3), 244 (20, M-·), 243 (100, [M-H]-), 171 (3); HR
ESI MS. Calcd for C12H21NO4 [M-H]-: m/z 243.1471, found: m/z 243.1474.
2-[(1-Oxyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)oxy]butanoic acid
(3c)ꢀYield 42%; IR (ν, cm-1, KBr): 2974, 2930 (C-H, stretch), 1726
(Cꢀ= ꢀO, stretch), 1460 (CH3, bend), 1389 (CH2, CH3, bend), 1178, 1130,
1080 (C-O, stretch); EI MS: m/z 258 (30, M+), 244 (32), 228 (4), 213 (2),
202 (4), 171 (14), 157 (21), 155 (15), 154 (17), 140 (26), 139 (24), 124 (60),
Experimental
General
116 (7), 109 (48), 98 (24), 85 (100), 71 (26), 69 (34), 57 (13), 56 (19), 55
(27), 43 (15), 41 (43); ESI MS: 258 (5, M-·), 257 (100, [M-H]-); HR ESI MS.
Calcd for C13H23NO4 [M-H]-: 257.1627, found: m/z 257.1622.
4-Hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (1) was synthesized
by oxidation of 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinol with 30% hydro-
gen peroxide (76% yield, mp 71–73°C), as previously described [21–
23]. THF was distilled over sodium under argon in the presence of
benzophenone. The experiments were performed in a two-necked
round-bottom flask of 25 mL capacity, equipped with a magnetic stir
bar, reflux condenser protected against humidity, under an argon
atmosphere. TLC was carried out on silica gel Merck Alurolle 5562 or
Alufolien 5554. Column chromatography was performed using Merck
silica gel, 230–400 mesh. TLC visualization was performed using
UV 254 nm light and/or iodine vapor. EI MS data were recorded on
an AMD 604 and Agilent Technologies 5975 B mass spectrometers.
EI mass spectra were obtained at 70 eV. ESI mass spectra (negative
ionisation, CH3OH as solvent) were recorded on a Micromass LCT
apparatus. IR spectra were recorded on an FT/IR Jasco 420 spectro-
photometer. Conditions of the fungicidal bioassay in vitro are identi-
cal to those described previously [24].
2-[(1-Oxyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)oxy]hexadecanoic
acid (3d)ꢀYield 3%; IR (ν, cm-1, KBr): 2925, 2854 (C-H, stretch), 1717
(Cꢀ= ꢀO, stretch), 1462 (CH3, bend), 1378 (CH2, CH3, bend), 1109 (C-O,
stretch); EI MS: m/z 426 (7, M+), 412 (100), 396 (57), 156 (16), 155 (11),
154 (9), 140 (43), 124 (43), 109 (11), 100 (14), 98 (17), 87 (10), 85 (21), 83
(19), 74 (20), 71 (22), 69 (21), 67 (9), 58 (19), 57 (20), 56 (16), 55 (30), 43
(43), 41 (25); ESI MS: 426 (100, M-·), 313 (5), 221 (10); HR ESI MS. Calcd
for C25H48NO4 (M-·): 426.3583, found: m/z 426.3569.
[(1-Oxyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)oxy](phenyl)acetic
acid (3e)ꢀYield 53%; IR (ν, cm-1, KBr): 3430, 2976, 2960 (C-H, stretch),
1736 (Cꢀ= ꢀO, stretch), 1460 (CH3, bend), 1389 (CH2, CH3, bend), 1177, 1099
(C-O, stretch); EI MS: m/z 306 (33, M+), 292 (55), 276 (10), 261 (10), 155
(23), 154 (24), 140 (28), 139 (18), 136 (80), 135 (100), 124 (52), 118 (18), 109
(31), 107 (42), 105 (10), 100 (13), 98 (16), 85 (17), 83 (12), 82 (13), 81 (14),
79 (44), 77 (27), 74 (11), 69 (23), 67 (12), 57 (17), 56 (19), 55 (25), 41 (34);
ESI MS: 306 (30, M-·), 305 (100, [M-H]-), 261 (10), 239 (8), 171 (35); HR
ESI MS. Calcd for C17H23NO4 [M-H]-: m/z 305.1627, found: m/z 305.1640.
General procedure for 3a–e
Anhydrous THF (5 mL) and 2-bromoalkanecarboxylic acid 2a–e
(1 mmol) were placed in a flask and the resultant solution was treated
with a 60% slurry of sodium hydride in mineral oil (0.9 g). Afer the
evolution of hydrogen ceased, compound 1 (0.17 g, 1 mmol) was
added. The mixture was stirred while it foamed again, then heated
under gentle reflux under argon for 24 h. Afer cooling, water (20 mL)
was carefully added and the resultant dark orange solution was trans-
ferred to a separation funnel. The aqueous mixture was washed with
Acknowledgment: This work was supported by the
Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education,
4180/E-142/S/2013.
diethyl ether (2 ꢀ× ꢀ 25 mL), with dichloromethane (2 ꢀ× ꢀ 20 mL) and then Received November 4, 2013; accepted February 6, 2014
Brought to you by | New York University Bobst Library Technical Services
Authenticated
Download Date | 6/4/15 10:01 PM