CHEMMEDCHEM
COMMUNICATIONS
were purchased from Invitrogen. Synthesis of 4-{[4-fluoro-3-(4-(5-
Conjugation reactions
oxopentanamide)piperazine-1-carbonyl)phenyl]methyl}-2H-phthala-
[18F]Benzyl-BFL ([18F]Bn-BFL, [18F]7): The crude [18F]BFL-NHS mix-
ture, prepared as described above in the acid-catalyzed exchange
reaction after 45 min at 508C, was loaded onto an SPE silica gel
cartridge (1.0 mCi) conditioned with pentane (500 mL). The car-
tridge was washed with pentane (2ꢁ150 mL), then the [18F]BFL-
NHS eluted with CH2Cl2 (3ꢁ150 mL) followed by DMSO (3ꢁ150 mL).
Activity collected in the elution fractions was as follows: 1.7 and
2.7 mCi for pentane fractions 1 and 2; 179.5, 273.0, and 14.3 mCi for
CH2Cl2 fractions 1, 2, and 3; 48.6, 192.1, and 14.3 mCi for DMSO
fractions 1, 2, and 3; and 229 mCi remaining on the silica cartridge.
To the combined CH2Cl2 fractions of [18F]BFL-NHS was added Et3N
(10 mL, 250 mm in CH2Cl2) and benzylamine (37.5 mL, 25 mm in
CH2Cl2) and stirred at room temperature for 40 min. HPLC analysis
(10 mL aliquot) demonstrated full conversion of [18F]BFL-NHS to
[18F]Bn-BFL. Bn-BFL (7) LC–ESIMS analysis found: 404.28 [M+Na]+,
362.18 [MÀFÀ]+, calculated: 404.17 [M+Na]+, 362.18 [M-FÀ]+.
[18F]Cysteine-BFL ([18F]Cys-BFL, [18F]8): The crude [18F]BFL-Mal mix-
ture, prepared as described above in the acid-catalyzed exchange
reaction after 45 min at 508C, was loaded onto an SPE silica gel
cartridge (1.0 mCi) conditioned with pentane (300 mL). The car-
tridge was washed with pentane (2ꢁ150 mL), then the labeled
compounds eluted with EtOAc (3ꢁ150 mL) and DMSO (3ꢁ150 mL).
Activity collected in the elution fractions was as follows: 2.6 and
2.5 mCi for pentane fractions 1 and 2; 198.9, 291.9, and 95.9 mCi for
EtOAc fractions 1, 2, and 3; 18.8, 30.5, and 5.6 mCi for DMSO frac-
tions 1, 2, and 3; and 317 mCi remaining on the silica cartridge. To
the combined EtOAc fractions of [18F]BFL-Mal was added Et3N
(10 mL, 250 mm in CH2Cl2) and l-cysteine (37.5 mL, 25 mm in CH2Cl2)
and stirred at room temperature for 40 min. HPLC analysis (10 mL
aliquot) demonstrated full conversion of [18F]BFL-Mal to [18F]Cys-
BFL. Cys-BFL (8) LC–ESIMS analysis found: 516.31 [MÀFÀ]+, 534.25
[MÀH+]À, calculated: 516.19 [MÀFÀ]+, 534.18 [MÀH+]+.
zin-1-one 9 was described earlier[9,16] 18FÀ ion (n.c.a.) in 18O-en-
.
riched water was purchased from PETNET (Woburn, MA, USA) and
dried by azeotropic distillation of water with MeCN in the presence
of tetra-n-butylammonium bicarbonate (TBAB; ABX) using a Synthra
RN Plus automated synthesizer (Synthra GmbH, Hamburg, Germa-
ny) operated by SynthraView software. The dried 18F/TBAB was re-
constituted in MeCN, collected in a 2 mL vial, and diluted to ach-
ieve a 12 mm TBAB solution. For non-radioactive compounds, LC–
ESIMS analysis and HPLC purifications were performed on a Waters
(Milford, MA, USA) LC–MS system. For LC–ESIMS analyses, a Waters
XTerra C18 (4.6ꢁ50 mm, 5 mm) column was used (Method A: elu-
ents 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in H2O (A) and MeCN (B); gradient: 0–
1.5 min, 5–100% B; 1.5–2.0 min 100% B; 5 mLminÀ1). Preparative
HPLC runs for synthetic intermediates involved an Atlantis Prep T3
OBD (19ꢁ50 mm, 5 mm) column (Method B: eluents 0.1% TFA (v/v)
in H2O (A) and MeCN (B); gradient: 0–1.5 min, 5–100% B; 1.5–
2.0 min 100% B; 30 mLminÀ1). Analytical HPLC of radiolabeled
compounds was performed with an Agilent 1200 Series HPLC and
a
Poroshell 120 EC-C18 (4.6ꢁ50 mm, 2.7 mm) reversed-phase
column (Method C: eluents 0.1% TFA (v/v) in H2O (A) and MeCN
(B); gradient: 0–0.3 min, 5% B; 0.3–7.5 min, 5–100% B; 7.5–10 min,
100% B; 2.5 mLminÀ1) with a multichannel-wavelength UV/Vis de-
tector, fluorescence detector, and a flow-through g detector con-
nected in series. Solid-phase extraction cartridges used were Oasis
C18 3-cc cartridge (60 mg, 30 mm particle size, Waters, MA, USA)
and Sep-Pak Silica 3-cc Vac cartridge (500 mg, 55–105 mm particle
size, (Waters)). The two-step, one-pot 18FÀ labeling procedure em-
ploying TMS-OTf was described previously.[3]
Isotope exchange reactions: To azeotropically dried 18F/TBAB
(30 mL, 12 mm TBAB in MeCN) in a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube, triflic an-
hydride (Tf2O; 10 mL, 250 mm in MeCN), tert-butanol (tBuOH; 10 mL,
250 mm in MeCN) and the BODIPY dye (12.5 mL, 10 mm in 1.5:1
CH2Cl2/MeCN, B493-NHS (1), BFL-NHS (2), B530-NHS (3), BTMR-X-
NHS (4), B630-X-NHS (5), BFL-Mal (6), or PARPi (9)) were added se-
quentially in 2 min intervals. The radioactivity of the reaction tube
was measured in a well counter then placed in 508C shaker. At 15,
30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min (with exception of 1, only 15 and
30 min data points were obtained), the tubes were removed from
heat, cooled in an ice bath for 20 s, and the activity of the reaction
tube measured. An aliquot (1–3 mL) was removed from the reaction
tube, radioactivity measured in a well counter and analyzed by
HPLC (Method C). Radioactivity of the reaction tube was measured
and then returned to the heated shaker. Kinetic data points were
obtained from the area of the HPLC radio-chromatograms and
plotted as a percent fraction. Observed rate constants were gener-
ated from the data by the program KINETIC of Dr. R. Fink, a gift
from the late Prof. William von Eggars Doering, which handles ki-
netic schemes containing up to seven components, and incorpo-
rates a calculation of Marquardt that generates error limits in the
rate constants at the 95% confidence level.[17,18] Second-order rate
constants were calculated using GraphPad Prism 4.0c (GraphPad
Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Exchange experiments were re-
peated for 2 in the same manner as described above by varying
starting concentrations of 2 (final reaction concentrations of 1.0
and 0.5 mm) or Tf2O/tBuOH (final reaction concentrations of 14, 10,
and 7 mm) while maintaining a constant final reaction volume. Ad-
ditional experiments were conducted for 2 at 0 and 238C.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants
P50CA86355 and RO1EB010011, and the Department of Energy
Training grant DE-SC0001781PO1.
Keywords: fluorine-18 · BODIPY · fluorescence · molecular
imaging · positron emission tomography
[3] J. A. Hendricks, E. J. Keliher, D. Wan, S. A. Hilderbrand, R. Weissleder, R.
[4] Z. Li, T. P. Lin, S. Liu, C. W. Huang, T. W. Hudnall, F. P. Gabbai, P. S. Conti,
[5] S. Liu, T. P. Lin, D. Li, L. Leamer, H. Shan, Z. Li, F. P. Gabbai, P. S. Conti,
Theranostics 2013, 3, 181–189.
[7] K. A. Menear, C. Adcock, R. Boulter, X. Cockcroft, L. Copsey, A. Cranston,
[8] M. Rouleau, A. Patel, M. J. Hendzel, S. H. Kaufmann, G. G. Poirier, Nat.
[9] T. Reiner, J. Lacy, E. J. Keliher, K. S. Yang, A. Ullal, R. H. Kohler, C. Vinego-
ni, R. Weissleder, Neoplasia 2012, 14, 169–177.
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ChemMedChem 0000, 00, 1 – 6
&
5
&
ÞÞ
These are not the final page numbers!