Organic Letters
Letter
structures of 4−6 also confirmed their t−c conformations in
N-Alkyl−amide bonds exist in a mixture of cis and trans
rotameric forms.13 Although the cis amide bond preference of
N-methylanilides is known, this is a special case that arises due
to the repulsion between the carbonyl oxygen lone pairs and
the π-electrons of the phenyl ring on the nitrogen atom in the
trans amide bond conformation.14 We were intrigued by the
complete reversal from trans (HNCO ∼ 180°) to cis
(MeNCO ∼ 0°) geometries of the hydrazide amide
bonds in 4−6 upon N-methylation. To probe this behavior, we
synthesized compound 4-CH2 (Figure 3A), wherein the NH
group in 4 was replaced with a CH2 isostere. Isosteric
replacement of NH with CH2 should eliminate the nN → π*Ar
interaction due to the absence of the electron donor lone pair
in 4-CH2 and should reveal the role of the nN → π*Ar
interaction in the conformational preference of 4−6. As
anticipated, we observed a mixture of cis and trans amide bond
rotamers in 4-CH2 (trans, 70%; cis, 30%). Therefore, it is clear
that the presence of the NH group is essential for the
stabilization of the cis conformations of the NMe−amide
bonds in 4−6. We ruled out any role of hydrogen bonding as
4-NMe (Figure 3A) also adopted a conformation similar to
that of 4 in solution and the solid state (Figure 3D). Inspection
of the crystal geometries of 4−6 and 4-NMe revealed positive
pyramidality of the phenyl carbon (CPh) toward the NH
nitrogen atom, and NBO analyses indicated the presence of
nN(amide) → π*Ar interactions in them (Table 1, Figure 3B−
E). Interestingly, in 4-NMe, we also observed pyramidalization
of the donor nitrogen atom (0.103 Å) toward the acceptor
carbon atom, indicating the presence of the nN(amide) → π*Ar
interaction (Figure 3D).
To systematically modulate the strength of nN(amide) →
π*Ar interactions and probe spectroscopic signature, we further
synthesized compounds 7−12 (Figure 3A) with various
substituents at the para-position of the phenyl ring. From
the solution NMR studies we confirmed the t−c rotamers to
be the most dominant rotamers of 7−12 in solution. A minor
c−c rotamer was also observed due to the isomerization of the
relatively smaller acetyl group to the cis form. As in 4−6, no
isomerization of the NMe−amide bond near the phenyl ring
was observed in 7−12. We could crystallize 7−10 and 12
the t−c rotameric forms with positive pyramidalization of the
aromatic carbon atom (CPh) toward the amidic NH nitrogen
atom (Figure 4B). Interestingly, similar to RH-5849-conf1 and
RH-5849-conf2, we could crystallize 12 in two different forms
(12tc-conf1) and (12tc-conf2) (Figure 4C,D). We could also
locate two conformational forms (t−c-conf1 and t−c-conf2) of
the t−c rotamer of 7−12 using quantum chemistry calculations
which showed the dominance of the nN(amide) → π*Ar
interaction in the t−c-conf2 and the dominance of the CO···
CO nO → π*CO interaction in the t−c-conf1 conformer,
respectively. This is also reflected in the higher pyramidality of
the acceptor CPh atoms in the optimized geometries of the t−c-
conf2 of 7−12 (Figure 4E, Table S7). We observed a good
correlation between the N···C distances and the corresponding
NBO nN(amide) → π*Ar interaction energies in 7−12 (Figure
4F and Figure S7D). However, the effect of the nN(amide) →
π*Ar interaction was not observed in the change in the CN
and CO bond lengths of the NH−amide group of 7−12
Figure 4. (A) Bar diagram showing the percentage of the rotameric
populations of 7−12. (B) Pyramidality of the phenyl carbon (CPh)
[directly bonded to the CO group near the NMe group] observed in
the crystal geometries of 7−10 and 12. (C), (D) Crystal geometries
of 12 in two different forms. (E) Pyramidality of the phenyl carbon
(CPh) bonded to the NMe−amide group in the optimized t−c-conf1
and t−c-conf2 conformations of 7−12. (F) Correlation of the N···C
distances (Å) and the NBO nN(amide) → π*Ar interaction energies
(E2) of 7−12. The average of the N···C distances (Å) and E2 values of
the t−c-conf1 and t−c-conf2 of 7−12 were used for this plot (Table
Interestingly, stronger nO → π*CO interactions in 7−12
should weaken the nN(amide) → π*Ar interactions and vice
versa, and these two interactions should have opposite effects
on the CO and NH stretching frequencies. nO → π*CO
interactions should increase the HN→CO conjugation of the
donor amide and, therefore, shorten the N−H bond, and a
blue shift in the N−H vibrational frequency is expected. On
the other hand, nN(amide) → π*Ar interactions should weaken
the HN→CO conjugation of the donor amide and, therefore,
elongate the N−H bond and cause a red shift in the N−H
vibrational frequency. The NH stretch region of the IR spectra
of 7−12 consisted of three overlapping peaks (Figure 5A and
Figure S9A). The concentration dependent IR experiments
suggested that the lowest frequency NH peak belongs to an
NH that is involved in intermolecular NH···OC hydrogen
bonding (HB) (Figure 5A), but the highest frequency peak
(gray) and the middle peak (cyan) (Figure S9A) are for NH
groups not involved in intermolecular HB. On the basis of
NMR and IR spectroscopic observations, we assigned the
highest frequency peak to the t−c and the middle peak to the
details). Analyses of the N−H vibrational frequencies of the t−
c rotamers of 7−12 showed a gradual red shift from 7 to 12
(Figure 5B, Table S9), which indicates the dominance of
nN(amide) → π*Ar interactions in 7−12 in CDCl3 solution. A
strong correlation of the red shift in the N−H vibrational
C
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX