3
Next, the scope of the nucleophiles was studied using spiro
phosphinooxazoline 1a under optimum reaction condition. The
results were shown in Table 3. For alkylamines, the desired
products 11a-11j were obtained in excellent yields and
enatioselectivities both for primary and secondary amines.
Benzylamine and substituted benzylamines gave the products in
high yields and enatioselectivities (11a-11c). The electron
property of the aromatic ring of benzylamine has no effect on the
yields and enatioselectivities. The steric hindrance has some
effect on the enantioselectivity. The excellent yields and
enantioselectivities were obtained for n-butylamine (11g), whilst
slightly lower ee value when isobutylamine was used (11h).
Compared with the PHOX ligand, spiro phosphinooxazolines 7
had better enatioselectivities with benzylamine as the nucleophile
(11a, 96.8% ee vs. 89% ee)12. The aromatic amines were not as
good nucleophiles as the alkylamines in terms of yields and
enatioselectivities. The substituents on the rings of aromatic
amines influenced the reaction significantly. The reactions
proceeded in good yields with anilines, but the
enantioselectivities were inferior to alkylamines (11j-11l).
Scheme 2.The plausible reaction mechanism
Conclusions
In summary,
phosphinooxazolines were developed and synthesized. The
asymmetric catalytic potential of them were demonstrated in the
asymmetric palladium catalyzed allylic aminations, affording the
corresponding chiral allylamines in high yields and
enatioselectivities. Further investigations of these new spiro
phosphinooxazolines in asymmetric catalysis are underway and
will be reported in due course.
the
new
conformationally
rigid
To further explore the scope of the reaction, the palladium
catalyzed allylic aminations were examined using symmetrical
and unsymmetrical allylacetates under optimum conditions. As
seen in Table 4, for the symmetrical allylacetate 9b, the catalyst
showed high yields and good enatioselectivities (11m-11o). For
the unsymmetrical allylacetate 9c, the catalyst showed high
yields and regioselectivities, but the enatioselectivities was
decreased greatly (11p-11r).
References and notes
1.
(a) B. M. Trost and D. L. Van Vranken, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 395–422;
(b) A. Pfaltz and M. Lautens, In Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis;
E. Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz and H. Yamamoto, Eds.; Springer: New York,
NY, 1999, 2, 833–884; (c) G. Helmchen and A. Pfaltz, Acc. Chem. Res.
2000, 33, 336–345.
Table 4. Substrate scope of asymmetric allylic aminationa
1a
R1 R2
N
OAc
R4
(4.5mol%)
2.
3.
(a) B. M. Trost and M. L. Crawley, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2921–2943;
(b) H. Yorimitsu and K. Oshima, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
4435–4439; (c) S.-L. You and L.-X. Dai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 5246–5248
R1 R2
N
H
[Pd(C3H5)Cl]2 (2mol%)
R3
R4
R3
BSA (3equiv)
9b
9c
R
R
3 = R4 = 4-OCH3-Ph
3 = Ph, R4 = CH3
10
CH2Cl2, 40°C, 6h
11
(a) L. Zhan and S. Ma, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 258–297; (b)
B. M. Trost, T. Zhang and J. D. Sieber, Chem. Sci. 2010, 1, 427–440;
(c) P. Tosatti, A. Nelson and S. P. Marsden, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012,
10, 3147–3163; (d) B. M. Trost, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2012, 16, 185–
194; (e) A. Lumbroso, M. L. Cooke and B. Breit, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2013, 52, 1890–1932; (f) C.-X. Zhuo, C. Zheng and S.-L. You, Acc.
Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2558–2573
O
N
HN
HN
MeO
OMe
MeO
OMe
OMe
MeO
b
b
b
4.
5.
(a) T. Hayashi, A. Yamamoto, Y. Ito, E. Nishioka, H. Miura and K.
Yanagi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6301–6311; (b) J. Park, S. Lee,
K. Ahn and C. Cho, Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 7263–7265; (c) J. Park,
S. Lee, K. Ahn and C. Cho, Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6137–6140.
(a) S.-L. You, X.-Z. Zhu, Y.-M. Luo, X.-L. Hou and L.-X. Dai, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7471–7472; (b) M. Mori, M. Nakanishi, D.
Kajishima and Y. Sato, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9801–9807; (c) R.
Weihofen, O. Tverskoy and G. Helmchen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
4, 5546– 5549; (d) I. Dubovyk, I. Watson and A. Yudin, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 14172–14173; (e) D. Popa, R. Marcos, S. Sayalero, A.
Vidal-Ferran and M. Pericas, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1539– 1556.
(a) Z. Liu and H. Du, Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3054–3057; (b) P. Tosatti, J.
Horn, A. J. Campbell, D. House, A. Nelson and S. P. Marsden, Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 3153–3157; (c) J.-B. Xia, W.-B. Liu, T.-M.
Wang and S.-L. You, Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6442–6446.
11m
11o
91%Yield
94%Yield
86.5%ee cd
11n
93%Yield
91.2%eecd
80.9%eecd
O
N
HN
HN
b
b
11q
95%Yield
14.3%eecd
11r
93%Yield
b
11p
95%Yield
13.1%eecd
8.7%eecd
aReaction conditions: allyl actates 9 (0.6 mmol), amines 10 (1.8 mmol),
ligand (0.027 mmol), palladium compound (0.012 mmol), BSA(1.8 mmol),
DCM (2mL). bIsolated yield. Determined by HPLC analysis. dThe absolute
configurations of 11m-11o were assigned as R by comparison with literature
data18, The absolute configurations of 11p-11r were assigned as S by
comparison with literature data19, 20
6.
7.
c
(a) K.-Y. Ye, H. He, W.-B. Liu, G. Helmchen, L-X. Dai and S.-L You, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19006–19014; (b) K.-Y. Ye, L.-X. Dai and
S.-L.You, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 5932– 5939; (c) J. Wang, J.
Chen, C. W. Kee and C.-H. Tan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51,
2382–2386.
.
A plausible mechanism was proposed to account for the
observed stereochemistry of the products. As is shown in Scheme
2, the W-type allyl transition state of Pd-η3-allyl intermediate
formed preferentially over its M-type counterpart, due to the
steric interaction between the two phenyl rings of the phosphine
and those of (E)-1,3-diphenylallyl acetate. Thus, the N-
nucleophiles would attack trans to the P atom to afford the
corresponding products.
8.
9.
(a) L. Du, P. Cao, J. Xing, Y. Lou, L. Jiang, L. Li and J. Liao, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4207-4211; (b)B. Feng, H.-G. Cheng, J.-R.
Chen, Q.-H. Deng, L.-Q. Lu and W.- J. Xiao, Chem. Commun. 2014,
50, 9550–9553.
P. von Matt, A. Pfaltz. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1993, 32, 566-568.
10. G. J. Dawson, C. G. Frost, J. M. Williams, S. J. Coote. Tetrahedron Lett.
1993, 34, 3149-3150.
11. J. Sprinz, G. Helmchen. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 1769-1772.
12. P. von Matt, O. Loiseleur, G. Koch, et al. Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 1994,
5(4), 573-584.