Carboxylic acids as A traceless activation group for conjugate additions: A three-step synthesis of (±)-pregabalin

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/ja505964r

The direct application of carboxylic acids as a traceless activation group for radical Michael additions has been accomplished via visible light-mediated photoredox catalysis. Photon-induced oxidation of a broad series of carboxylic acids, including hydrocarbon-substituted, α-oxy, and α-amino acids, provides a versatile CO₂-extrusion platform to generate Michael donors without the requirement for organometallic activation or propagation. A diverse array of Michael acceptors is amenable to this new conjugate addition strategy. An application of this technology to a three-step synthesis of the medicinal agent pregabalin (commercialized by Pfizer under the trade name Lyrica) is also presented.

Full text of DOI:10.1021/ja505964r

Communication
pubs.acs.org/JACS
Open Access on 07/17/2015
Carboxylic Acids as A Traceless Activation Group for Conjugate
Additions: A Three-Step Synthesis of ( )-Pregabalin
Lingling Chu, Chisa Ohta, Zhiwei Zuo, and David W. C. MacMillan*
Merck Center for Catalysis at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States
S
* Supporting Information
nucleophiles or donor components in this 1,4-coupling path-
way.2,3 Expanding upon this theme, we recently questioned
whether simple and abundant carboxylic acids might be
generically5 employed as a traceless activation group for radical
1,4-conjugate additions via the use of a photoredox-mediated
CO2-extrusion mechanism.6,7 Herein, we describe the successful
execution of these ideals and present a new, decarboxylative 1,4-
addition reaction that enables a broad array of organic molecules
to participate as Michael donors without the need for
organometallic activation or propagation (eq 2). We envision
that the use of carboxylic acids as a generic TAG for Michael
chemistry will (i) reduce operational complexity, (ii) greatly
expand the scope, and (iii) lower the costs associated with
performing 1,4-conjugate addition reactions.
ABSTRACT: The direct application of carboxylic acids as
a traceless activation group for radical Michael additions
has been accomplished via visible light-mediated photo-
redox catalysis. Photon-induced oxidation of a broad series
of carboxylic acids, including hydrocarbon-substituted, α-
oxy, and α-amino acids, provides a versatile CO2-extrusion
platform to generate Michael donors without the require-
ment for organometallic activation or propagation. A
diverse array of Michael acceptors is amenable to this new
conjugate addition strategy. An application of this
technology to a three-step synthesis of the medicinal
agent pregabalin (commercialized by Pfizer under the
trade name Lyrica) is also presented.
Recently, our laboratory introduced a new protocol for the
direct construction of benzylic amines from α-amino acids using
a previously unknown photoredox-catalyzed decarboxylation−
ince the discovery of the Michael reaction in 1887,1 1,4-
8
3
S
conjugate additions have become a central bond con-
struction within the field of organic synthesis.2 This broadly
employed fragment-coupling mechanism is founded upon the
use of a series of electrophilic olefins (now referred to as Michael
acceptors) that combine with nucleophiles3 or SOMO-activated
partners4 in a regioselective 1,4-addition pathway (eq 1). Over
aryl coupling mechanism. A critical feature of this new Csp -
arylation reaction is the capacity for aliphatic carboxylic acids to
undergo CO2-extrusion under mild conditions (room temper-
ature, household light bulb) to generate primary, secondary, and
tertiary radicals, which subsequently participate in hetero
radical−radical couplings. Seeking to take advantage of this
new oxidative decarboxylation pathway, we recognized that
simple carboxylic acids should therefore be suitable and generic
precursors for radical conjugate addition reactions under similar
photoredox conditions (given the long established success of
SOMO-activated fragments in Michael additions).4 As described
more specifically in Scheme 1, it is well-known that photoredox
catalysts, such as Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)+ 1, can readily
accept photons from visible light to generate the strongly
oxidizing excited state *Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)+ 2, (E1*/I2II/II
=
+1.21 V vs saturated calomel electrode (SCE) in CH3CN).9 We
assumed that base-promoted deprotonation of a carboxylic acid
substrate (cyclohexyl carboxylic acid (3) is depicted) and
subsequent single-electron transfer (SET) oxidation of the
resulting carboxylate functionality (hexanoate ion, Er1e/d2 = +1.16 V
vs SCE)10 by the visible-light-excited photocatalyst *Ir[dF-
(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)+ 2 should be thermodynamically favorable,
to generate the reduced Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy) 6 and the
carboxyl radical species which would immediately extrude CO2
to give the SOMO species 4. We anticipated that the alkyl radical
4 would be highly nucleophilic and thereby readily undergo
conjugate addition with electron-deficient olefin 5 to forge a new
C−C bond with concomitant formation of the alkyl radical 7.4
the past four decades, significant advances have been made in the
development of traceless activation groups (TAGs) such as
cuprates, boronic acids, halides, and Grignard reagents that
enable a broad range of organic structures to participate as
Received: June 13, 2014
Published: July 17, 2014
© 2014 American Chemical Society
10886
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja505964r | J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10886−10889

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
readily reduced excited states, such as Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2-
(dtbbpy)PF6 (1) (entry 1, 67% yield); however, less oxidizing
systems (Ir(dFppy)3 and Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)PF6) resulted in
dramatic decreases in efficiency (entries 2 and 3). A survey of
inorganic bases revealed that K2HPO4 is the preferred carboxylic
acid deprotonation system, providing the desired pyrrolidine
Michael adduct in the highest yield (entry 9, 92% yield). It is
important to note that control experiments have demonstrated
that both photocatalyst and visible light are essential for the
desired transformation to occur (entries 4 and 5).
Scheme 1. Proposed Mechanism for Decarboxylative
Alkylation
With optimal reaction conditions in hand, we next evaluated
the scope of Michael acceptors that can participate in this new
CO2-extrusion, conjugate addition protocol. As revealed in Table
2, these mild reaction conditions are compatible with a wide
a
Table 2. Decarboxylative Addition: Michael Acceptor Scope
red
1/2
Facile SET reduction of the α-acyl radical 7 (E = −0.60 V vs
SCE)11 by the strongly reducing Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)
9
III/II
1/2
complex 6 (E
= −1.37 V vs SCE) would deliver the desired
1,4-conjugate addition product (upon enolate protonation),
while simultaneously regenerating photocatalyst 1.
Evaluation of this CO2-extrusion/conjugate addition strategy
was first examined with Cbz-protected proline, diethyl
ethylidenemalonate as the Michael acceptor, and a series of Ir-
based photocatalysts in the presence of CsF (base) and a
household 26 W fluorescent light bulb (Table 1). We were
delighted to find that the proposed decarboxylative alkylation
was indeed feasible in the presence of photocatalysts that have
Table 1. Decarboxylative Conjugate Addition: Catalyst
Evaluation
a
a
entry
photocatalyst
Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)+
base
CsF
yield (%)
Reaction performed using the optimized conditions from Table 1
(see SI). All cited yields are isolated. Ratios of diastereoisomers
1
2
3
4
67
<5
10
0
b
determined by 1H NMR analysis are between 1 and 1.5:1. Performed
Ir(dFppy)3
Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)+
CsF
c
with 1.2 equiv of CsF instead of K2HPO4. Performed on a 1.0 mmol
scale. Performed with 1.5 equiv of Cbz-Pro-OH.
CsF
d
none
CsF
b
5
Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)+
Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)+
Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)+
Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)+
Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbbpy)+
CsF
0
range of functional groups, such as esters, bromides, ketones,
aldehydes, sulfones, imides, and carboxylic acids, providing a
versatile platform for further synthetic manipulations. Unsatu-
rated ketones are well tolerated in both cyclic and acyclic form
(products 10 and 11, 81−88% yield). Moreover, acyclic enals
undergo the desired radical conjugate addition with excellent
efficiency (product 12, 92% yield). The resulting aldehyde
adducts are versatile precursors to a wide range of bicyclic
6
7
8
9
CsOAc
Cs2CO3
K2CO3
K2HPO4
73
65
31
92
a
b
Isolated yields. Reaction performed in the absence of visible light.
Abbreviations: ppy, 2-phenylpyridyl; dtbbpy, 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-
bipyridyl; Cbz, benzyl carbamoyl; CFL, compact fluorescent light.
10887
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja505964r | J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10886−10889

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
a
Table 3. Decarboxylative Conjugate Addition: Scope of Carboxylic Acid Fragment
a
Reaction performed using the optimized conditions from Table 1 (see SI). The cited yields are isolated. Ratios of diastereoisomers determined by
b
c
1H NMR analysis are between 1 and 1.5:1. Reaction performed using 34 W blue LED, instead of 26 W fluorescent light. Cyclopentanecarboxylic
acid and octanoic acid also worked under the reaction conditions, affording the corresponding products in ≥58% yield with 1,4-dioxane as a solvent.
d
Reaction concentration is 0.2 M.
systems including pyrrolizidine12 and indolizidine13 alkaloids,
which are large classes of natural products showing a variety of
interesting biological activities (see Supporting Information (SI)
for a demonstration of a pyrrolizidine alkaloid synthesis).
Moreover, this protocol could be further applied to other
electrophilic olefins, including α,β-unsaturated imides, sulfones,
and malonates, as well as acrylates and maleates, to furnish a
variety of alkylated amines in good to excellent yields (products
14−24, 69−93% yield). In terms of the scope of acrylate
coupling partners, unsubstituted as well as α-aryl and α-alkyl
groups are well tolerated (products 17−22, 69−90% yield).
Interestingly, variation of the electronic nature of the aromatic
ring at the α-position of the acrylates has little influence on the
reaction efficiency (products 19−22, 76−90% yield). With
respect to the alkylidene malonate substrates, linear and sterically
demanding substituents (R = CH2CH2Ph, cyclohexyl) can be
attached at the β-olefin position without loss in overall yield
(products 23 and 24, 87−92% yield). Intriguingly, this new
protocol provides a strategy for direct access to γ-amino acids
from naturally occurring α-amino acids. As demonstrated in
Table 2, the direct decarboxylative coupling of Cbz-Pro-OH with
2-benzylacrylic acid provides the corresponding γ-amino acid
with useful reaction efficiency (product 13, 57% yield).
We next turned our attention to the scope of carboxylic acids
that can participate in this new conjugate addition protocol. As
revealed in Table 3, a variety of cyclic (e.g., cyclohexyl,
cyclopentyl, and cyclobutyl) and acyclic (e.g., 2-hexyldecanoic
acid) hydrocarbon radical precursors can be readily employed
with good levels of efficiency (products 27−30, 53−97% yield).
Moreover, this transformation appears to be tolerant of a broad
range of substituents at the carboxylic α-position. Indeed a series
of cyclic systems that incorporate α-oxy groups (e.g., tetrahydro-
2H-pyran-2-carboxylic and 2-tetrahydrofuranoic acid), provide
the corresponding conjugate adduct in high yield (products 25
and 26, ≥90% yield). Importantly, a variety of natural α-amino
acids (e.g., Boc-protected Phe, Pro, Trp, Ser, Gly) readily
participate in this decarboxylative conjugate addition to generate
α-alkylated amines in a highly efficient fashion (products 31, 35,
36, 40, and 44, 57−97% yield). Notably, α-amino acids bearing
an unprotected amide or indole ring were also tolerated under
these standard conditions (products 32 and 36, 57−84% yield).
Not surprisingly, this decarboxylative protocol is also amenable
to the use of unnatural α-amino acids such as N-Boc-2-
piperidinecarboxylic acid and N-Boc-morpholine-3-carboxylic
acid (products 42 and 43, 94−95% yield). Perhaps most
remarkably, we have found that the amino acid component can
10888
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja505964r | J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10886−10889

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
Oxford, 1992. (b) Schmalz, H.-G. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis;
Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 4,
Chapter 1.5.
(3) For selected reviews on nucleophilic conjugate additions, see:
(a) Krause, N.; Gerold, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 186.
(b) Rossiter, B. E.; Swingle, N. M. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 771.
(c) Leonard, J.; Diez-Barra, E.; Merino, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
2051. (d) Sibi, M. P.; Manyem, S. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 8033.
(e) Vicario, J. L.; Badia, D.; Carrillo, L. Synthesis 2007, 2065. (f) Alexakis,
be successfully extended to dipeptides, providing the corre-
sponding coupled products in excellent yields (products 37 and
38, 88−90% yield). It is important to note that this highly
efficient conjugate addition strategy employs a 1:1 ratio of
carboxylic acid and electron-deficient olefin at room temper-
ature, without the need for stoichiometric oxidants and/or
forcing reaction conditions.
To further demonstrate the operational simplicity and
generality of this new Michael addition protocol, we present a
three-step racemic synthesis of pregabalin, an anticonvulsant
drug that has been commercialized by Pfizer under the trade
name Lyrica (eq 3).14 At the present time, pregabalin is produced
̀ ́
A.; Backvall, J. E.; Krause, N.; Pamies, O.; Dieguez, M. Chem. Rev. 2008,
̈
108, 2796. (g) Harutyunyan, S. R.; den Hartog, T.; Geurts, K.;
Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2824.
(4) For selected reviews on radical conjugate additions, see:
(a) Renaud, P.; Gerster, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2562.
(b) Sibi, M. P.; Porter, N. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 163. (c) Sibi, M.
P.; Manyem, S.; Zimmerman, J. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3263.
(d) Srikanth, G. S. C.; Castle, S. L. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 10377.
(5) The use of carboxylic acids as radical precursors for conjugate
additions has previously been accomplished in specific cases; however, a
generic system has not been developed to our knowledge. See:
(a) Yoshimi, Y.; Masuda, M.; Mizunashi, T.; Nishikawa, K.; Maeda, K.;
Koshida, N.; Itou, T.; Morita, T.; Hatanaka, M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4652.
(b) Chen, L.; Chao, C. S.; Pan, Y.; Dong, S.; Teo, Y. C.; Wang, J.; Tan,
C.-H. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 5922. (c) Miyake, Y.; Nakajima, K.;
Nishibayashi, Y. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 7854.
(6) For specifically tailored carboxylate derivatives that have been
developed to enable radical conjugate addition see: (a) Barton, D. H. R.;
Crich, D.; Kretzschmar, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 1055. (b) Barton,
D. H. R.; Crich, D.; Kretzschmar, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1986,
39. (c) Barton, D. H. R.; Sas, W. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 3419.
(d) Ahmad-Junan, S. A.; Walkington, A. J.; Whiting, D. A. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1992, 2313. (e) Barton, D. H. R.; Chern, C.-Y.;
Jaszberenyi, J. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5013. (f) Barton, D. H. R.;
Chern, C.-Y.; Jaszberenyi, J. C. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 1867. (g) Garner,
P. P.; Cox, P. B.; Klippenstein, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 4183.
(h) Barton, D. H. R.; Liu, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2431. (i) Zhu,
X.; Ganesan, A. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 157. (j) Garner, P.; Anderson, J.
T.; Cox, P. B.; Klippenstein, S. J.; Leslie, R.; Scardovi, N. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 6195. (k) Schnermann, M. J.; Overman, L. E. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 9576. (l) Lackner, G. L.; Quasdorf, K. W.; Overman, L.
E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 15342.
(7) For reviews on decarboxylations, see: (a) Johnson, R. G.; Ingham,
R. K. Chem. Rev. 1956, 56, 219. (b) Vijh, A. K.; Conway, B. E. Chem. Rev.
1967, 67, 623. (c) Griesbeck, A. G.; Kramer, W.; Oelgemoller, M. Synlett
1999, 1169. (d) Gooβen, L. J.; Rodriguez, N.; Gooβen, K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3100. (e) Cornella, J.; Larrosa, I. Synthesis 2012, 653.
(8) Zuo, Z.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5257.
(9) Lowry, M. S.; Goldsmith, J. I.; Slinker, J. D.; Rohl, R.; Pascal, R. A.;
Malliaras, G. G.; Bernhard, S. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 5712.
on scale via a process that involves a cyanide conjugate addition
reaction. As revealed in eq 3, exposure of Boc-protected glycine
and 3-methylbutylidene malonate to our decarboxylative
alkylation conditions provided the corresponding malonate
with excellent efficiency (96% yield). Hydrolysis under basic
conditions followed by treatment with acid promoted decarbox-
ylation to afford racemic pregabalin in only three steps.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the utility of carboxylic
acids as a traceless activation group for radical conjugate addition
via visible light-mediated photoredox catalysis. The versatile
method tolerates a wide range of functional groups and shows
broad scope with regard to both the carboxylic acid and Michael
acceptor components. More importantly, this new process
provides an alternative to generating Michael donors without the
requirement of organometallic activation or propagation.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
Experimental procedures and spectral data. This material is
available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
■
S
(10) Galicia, M.; Gonzalez, F. J. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2002, 149, D46.
(11) Bortolamei, N.; Isse, A. A.; Gennaro, A. Electrochim. Acta 2010,
55, 8312.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
dmacmill@princeton.edu
■
(12) (a) Wrbbel, J. T. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Pharmacology;
Brossi, A., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1985; Vol. 26, Chapter 7.
(b) Rizk, A. F. H. Naturally Occurring Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids; CRC Press:
Boston, 1991. (c) Takahata, H.; Momose, T. In The Alkaloids; Cordell,
G. A., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1993; Vol. 26, p 327. (d) Liddell,
J. R. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1998, 15, 363. (e) Kim, H.-Y.; Stermitz, F. R.; Li, J.
K.-K.; Coulombe, R. A., Jr. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1999, 37, 619. (f) Tepe,
J. J.; William, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2951. (g) Liddell, J. R.
Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000, 17, 455.
(13) (a) Howard, A. S.; Michael, J. P. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and
Pharmacology; Brossi, A., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1986; Vol. 28,
Chapter 3. (b) Daly, J. W.; Spande, T. F.; Garraffo, H. M. J. Nat. Prod.
2005, 68, 1556.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
Financial support was provided by the NIH General Medical
Sciences (NIHGMS Grant R01 GM103558-03) and gifts from
Merck and Amgen. Z.Z. and L.C. are grateful for postdoctoral
fellowships from the Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry.
REFERENCES
■
(14) (a) Martinez, C. A.; Hu, S.; Dumond, Y.; Tao, J.; Kelleher, P.;
Tully, L. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 392. (b) Mujahid, M.;
Muthukrishnan, M. Chirality 2013, 25, 965.
(1) (a) Michael, A. J. Prakt. Chem. 1887, 35, 349. (b) Michael, A. J.
Prakt. Chem. 1894, 49, 20.
(2) For selected reviews on 1,4-conjugate additions, see: (a) Perlmut-
ter, P. Conjugate Addition Reactions in Organic Synthesis; Pergamon:
10889
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja505964r | J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10886−10889