K. Ravinder et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 5475–5478
5477
OH
O
a
b
OH
O
HO
PMBO
d
PMBO
H2N
2
3
6
c
O
e
O
O
O
PMBO
HO
4
5
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) PMBBr, NaH, THF, 92%; (b) OsO4, NMO, acetone/water 7:3, 70%; (c) 2,2-DMP, PTSA, 82%; (d) DDQ,
DCM/water 9:1, 90%; (e) (i) p-TsCl, Py, 0 °C, 80%, (ii) NaN3, DMF, 86%, (iii) 10% Pd/C, H2, 92%.
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
N
N
H
N
H
a
c
b
Fragment A + 6
N
H
N
8
7
Boc
OH
OH
NBoc
NBoc
O
O
N
NBoc
N
H
N
H
d
N
e
1
(Tiruchanduramine hydrochloride)
N
BocNH
BocNH
N
NBoc
Boc
H
11
10
9
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) DCC, DMAP, DCM, 62% or EDCI, HOBT, dry DMF, 65%; (b) (Boc)2O, Et3N, DCM, 92%; (c) PPTSA,
MeOH, 90%; (d) 9, TPP, DEAD, THF, 52%; (e) 2 M HCl, MeOH, rt, 4 h 63%.
But-3-en-1-ol was protected with p-methoxybenzyl bro-
mide to give compound 2, which on dihydroxylation
under standard conditions gave the diol 3. The diol
was then protected as the acetonide to give compound
4. The p-methoxybenzyl group in 4 was removed using
DDQ to give the primary alcohol 5, which was con-
verted into the amino-acetonide12 6 with in an overall
yield of 37% (Scheme 2).
ian, the Department of Ocean Development, New Delhi,
India, for financial assistance, Dr. J. S. Yadav, Director
IICT for his constant encouragement, and UGC, CSIR,
New Delhi, for providing fellowships to K.R. and
A.V.R. and a Humboldt grant to P.R.
References and notes
1. (a) Davidson, B. S. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 1771; (b)
Faulkner, D. J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1993, 10, 497, 1994, 11,
355; 1995, 12, 223; 1996, 13, 75; 1997, 14, 259; 1998, 15,
113; 1999, 16, 155; 2000, 17, 7; 2001, 18, 1; 2002, 19, 1.
2. (a) Reddy, M. V. R.; Faulkner, D. J.; Venkateswarlu, Y.;
Rao, M. R. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 3457; (b) Reddy, M. V.
R.; Rao, M. R.; Rhodes, D.; Hansen, M. S. T.; Rubbins,
K.; Bhushman, F.; Venkateswarlu, Y.; Faulkner, D. J.
J Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 1901.
3. (a) Carroll, A. R.; Healy, P. C.; Quinn, R. J.; Tranter, C.
J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2680; (b) Ortega, M. J.; Zubia, E.;
Ocana, J. M.; Naranjo, S.; Salva, J. Tetrahedron 2000, 56,
3963.
The amino-acetonide 6 and fragment A were coupled to
give compound 7, which was protected using Boc anhy-
dride to yield compound 8. The acetonide group in 8
was removed under acidic (PPTSA) conditions to afford
the diol 9.13 The diol 9 was reacted with N,N0N00-tri-Boc-
guanidine 1014 under Mitsunobu conditions to give Boc-
protected tiruchanduramine 11 in 52% yield. Finally, the
Boc groups were deprotected under acidic conditions15
to give tiruchanduramine hydrochloride (1) (Scheme
3), the NMR data of which were identical with those
of the natural product.
4. Gozler, T.; Gozler, B.; Linden, A.; Hesse, M. Phytochem-
istry 1996, 43, 1425.
5. Braestrup, C.; Nielsen, M.; Olsen, C. E. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 1980, 77, 2288.
Tiruchanduramine 1 showed promising a-glucosidase
inhibitory activity (IC50 78.2 lg/mL) as compared with
acarbose16 at 100 lg/mL as the standard.
6. Horii, S.; Kameda, Y. J Antibiot. 1968, 21, 665.
7. Rinehart, K. L., Jr.; Kobayashi, J.; Harbour, G. C.;
Gilmore, J.; Mascal, M.; Holt, T. G.; Shield, L. S.;
Lafargue, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 3378.
8. Kobayashi, J.; Cheng, J. F.; Ohta, T.; Nozoe, S.; Ohizumi,
Y.; Sasaki, T. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3666.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Dr. V. K. Meenakshi, Department of
Zoology, APC Mahalaxmi College for Women, Tutico-
rin 628 002, Tamilnadu, India, for identifying the ascid-
9. Badre, A.; Boulanger, A.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Banaigs, B.;
Combaut, G.; Francisco, C. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 528.