Gold Modified Zeolite: An Efficient Heterogeneous Catalyst for N-Arylation of Indazole
Emayavaramban et al.
FTIR (KBr): ꢆmax 1511 cm−1 (asym, –NO2ꢄ, ꢆmax
1336 cm−1 (sym, –NO2ꢄ; GC-MS m/z: 239 (M+ꢄ.
5. Q. Zhao, J. Du, H. Gu, X. Teng, Q. Zhang, H. Qin, and N. Liu,
Pancreas 34, 242 (2007).
6. M. Hadden, D. M. Deering, A. J. Henderson, M. D. Surman,
M. Luche, Y. Khmelnitsky, S. Vickers, J. Viggers, S. Cheetham,
and P. R. Guzzo, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20, 7020
(2010).
7. A. Y. Lebedev, A. S. Khartulyari, and A. Z. Voskoboynikov, J. Org.
Chem. 70, 596 (2005).
8. V. Collot, J. C. Ros, C. Alayrac, B. Witulski, and S. Rault, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 43, 2695 (2002).
9. C. Dell’Erba, M. Novi, G. Petrillo, and C. Tavani, Tetrahedron 50,
3529 (1994).
10. P. Li, J. Zhao, C. Wu, R. C. Larock, and F. Shi, Org. Lett. 13, 3340
(2011).
11. P. López-Alvarado, C. Avendaño, and J. C. Menéndez, Tetrahedron
Lett. 33, 6875 (1992).
12. P. López-Alvarado, C. Avendaño, and J. C. Menéndez, J. Org. Chem.
61, 5865 (1996).
3.3.4. 1-(2-Cyanophenyl)-1H-Indazole (Table IV, Entry
6, N1-Arylated Product)
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3ꢄ: ꢅ 7.30 (t, 1H, J =
8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.49–7.94 (m, 7H, Ar-H), 8.25 (s, 1H,
CH N) ppm.
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3ꢄ: ꢅ 109.5 (–C), 110.5
(–CH), 118.0 (–CH), 118.6 (–C), 121.9 (–C), 122.0 (–CH),
122.6 (–CH), 126.3 (–C), 128.2 (–CH), 133.7 (–CH), 137.4
(–CH), 138.7 (–C) ppm.
FTIR (KBr): ꢆmax 2222 cm−1 (-CN); GC-MS m/z:
219 (M+ꢄ.
13. G. I. Elliott and J. P. Konopelski, Org. Lett. 2, 3055 (2000).
14. P. Y. S. Lam, S. Deudon, K. M. Averill, R. Li, M. Y. He, P. DeShong,
and C. G. Clark, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 7600 (2000).
15. S. Ganesh Babu and R. Karvembu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50, 9594
(2011).
16. F.-F. Yong, Y.-C. Teo, S.-H. Tay, B. Y.-H. Tan, and K.-H. Lim, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 52, 1161 (2011).
17. R. F. C. Brown, F. W. Eastwood, G. B. Fallon, S. C. Lee, and
R. P. McGeary, Aust. J. Chem. 47, 991 (1994).
18. G. A. Burley, D. L. Davies, G. A. Griffith, M. Lee, and K. Singh,
J. Org. Chem. 75, 980 (2010).
4. CONCLUSION
In summary, Au-zeolites with different content of gold
were prepared by an ion-exchange method and charac-
terized by various analytical techniques. UV-DRS spec-
trum of the prepared Au-zeolites exhibited the surface
plasmon resonance at 526 nm, which is characteristic
feature of gold nanoparticles. TEM image clearly indi-
cated the well crystalline nature of gold modified zeo-
lite and absence of any defects in the crystals. Though
we could not detect gold nanoparticles on the surface of
zeolite crystals, EDX measurement confirmed the pres-
19. C. G. Arellano, A. Corma, and M. Iglesias, J. Catal. 238, 497
(2006).
20. V. K. Kanuru, G. Kyriakou, S. K. Beaumont, A. C. Papageorgiou,
ence of gold in them. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption and
IP: 79.133.106.103 On: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:45:53
D. J. Watson, and R. M. Lambert, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 8081
BET surface area analysis revealed thCaotptyhreigmhti:crAompoerroiucsan Scientific Publishers
(2010).
Delivered by Ingenta
nature of the catalyst with an average surface area of
21. D. K. Dumbre, P. N. Yadav, S. K. Bhargava, and V. R. Choudhary,
J. Catal. 301, 134 (2013).
644 m2g−1. From the application point of view of the
newly prepared catalyst, Au-zeolite was used as an effi-
cient heterogeneous catalyst for N -arylation of indazoles
with various substituted aryl halides in presence of K2CO3
and DMAc at 110 ꢀC. Reusability of gold modified zeolite
was tested for five cycles and it’s stability against leach-
ing of gold was confirmed by ICP-AES. The N -arylated
heterocyclic products obtained in this study were char-
acterized by 1H, 13C NMR spectroscopy and GC-MS
analysis.
22. J. D. Sherman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3471 (1999).
23. H. S. Nalwa (ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnol-
ogy, American Scientific Publishers, Los Angeles, CA (2004/2011),
Vol. 1–25.
24. A. A. Elzatahry, T. A. Salah El-Din, E. A. Elsayed, D. M. Aldhayan,
M. A. M. Wadaan, A. M. Al.-Enizi, and S. S. Al.-Deyab, Sci. Adv.
Mater. 6, 1531 (2014).
25. K. Honda, M. Itakura, Y. Matsuura, A. Onda, Y. Ide, M. Sadakane,
and T. Sano, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 13, 3020 (2013).
26. V. Rama, K. Kanagaraj, and K. Pitchumani, J. Org. Chem. 76, 9090
(2011).
27. E. Smolentseva, N. Bogdanchikova, A. Simakov, A. Pestryakov,
M. Avalos, M. H. Farias, A. Tompos, and V. Gurin, J. Nanosci.
Nanotechnol. 7, 1882 (2007).
28. M. Lakshmi Kantam, B. Purna Chandra Rao, B. M. Choudary, and
R. Sudarshan Reddy, Synlett 14, 2195 (2006).
Acknowledgment: We
acknowledge
University
Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi (UGC) F.
No. 37–98/2009(SR) dated 19th December 2009 for
the financial support in the form of a major research
project.
29. P. Emayavaramban, K. Selvam, and N. Dharmaraj, Adv. Sci. Eng.
Med. 6, 649 (2014).
30. J. A. Rabo, Zeolite Chemistry and Catalysis, ACS, Washington,
(1976).
31. S. Markovic, V. Dondur, and R. Dimitrijevic, J. Mol. Struct. 654, 223
(2003).
References and Notes
1. Z. Ali, D. Ferreira, P. Carvalho, M. A. Avery, and I. A. J. Khan, Nat.
Prod. 71, 1111 (2008).
32. N. Ninan, M. Muthiah, I-K. Park, A. Elain, T. W. Wong,
S. Thomas, and Y. Grohens, J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 11, 1550
(2015).
33. F. Fan, Z. Feng, and C. Li, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 4794 (2010).
34. P. K. Dutta, D. C. Shieh, and M. Prui, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 2332
(1987).
2. L. Mosti, G. Menozzi, P. Schenone, D. Cervo, G. Esposito, and
E. Marmo, Farmaco 45, 415 (1990).
3. A. Thangadurai, M. Minu, S. Wakode, S. Agrawal, and
B. Narasimhan, Med. Chem. Res. 21, 1509 (2012).
4. G. Dessole, D. Branca, F. Ferrigno, O. Kinzel, E. Muraglia,
M. C. Palumbi, M. Rowley, S. Serafini, C. Steinkühler, and P. Jones,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19, 4191 (2009).
35. X. Zhang, X. Ke, and H. Zhu, Chem. Eur. J. 18, 8048 (2012).
9102
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 16, 9093–9103, 2016