1882
A. W. Thomas / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 1881–1884
Polymer-supported carbodiimides (Method A: Scheme
3). Surprisingly, employing polymer supported carbo-
diimides 14 led to a superior reaction.8 Indeed the
desired products 13 (R=Me) could be obtained in high
yield and purity by simply filtering the reaction mixture
followed by evaporation without the need for chroma-
tographic purification. This is an example where the use
of a polymer supported version of a reagent offers a dis-
tinct advantage in both the reaction and in the purification
step. In the event, it was found that the use of 2.0 equiv
of polymer supported carbodiimide along with 1.1 equiv
of freshly distilled N-methyl propargylamine gave the
best results. When the reaction was conducted in di-
chloromethane, the reaction proceeded instantaneously,
at room temperature, to form the 1,3-dipolar cycload-
dition product 15, which could be isolated in pure form.
The subsequent amide bond formation reaction
required reaction times from 30 min to 3 h in order to
proceed to completion.9
Scheme 1. Route to 4 via isatoic anhydride: Reagents and conditions:
(a) PS-DMAP, 0.1 equiv, MeNHCH2CꢁCH, 2.0 equiv, toluene,
reflux, 3 h, SiO2 chromatography, 60%; (b) NaNO2, HCl, NaN3, tol-
uene, reflux, 2 h, SiO2 chromatograhphy, 50%.
found that treatment of isatoic anhydride 5 with 2 equiv
of N-methyl propargylamine and 0.2 equiv of polymer
supported DMAP afforded the desired product 6 in
60% yield after chromatography. However substantial
quantities of the undesired acid 8 and two additional
unidentified impurities were detected by HPLC. Sub-
sequent diazotisation of 6 and in situ azide formation by
addition of sodium azide, followed by heating the result-
ing mixture under reflux in toluene, afforded the tricyclic
product 4 in 50% yield, after chromatography, as repor-
ted previously.4 However, this route was not considered
satisfactory for parallel synthetic exploitation.
Product isolation required removal of the reaction
solution by filtration and evaporation to afford the
desired compounds 13 (R=Me) in a pure form. How-
ever, when propargylamine was employed a different
reaction course took place via 16 and 17. When the
reaction was conducted in the presence of 2.0 equiv of
polymer supported carbodiimide along with 1.1 equiv of
freshly distilled propargylamine none of the desired
product was detected by HPLC. In contrast, it was
found that only a small amount of the starting ortho-
azido acid was recovered. This suggested that the poly-
mer supported carbodiimide was acting as a sequestering
agent for the acid (in the form of 16). However, when
using excess of the amine (3.5 equiv was optimal) the
amide bond formation reaction proceeded smoothly in
dichloromethane or toluene at 40 ꢀC to afford 17, which
can be isolated, in quantitative yield, if desired. The
subsequent dipolar cycloaddition step [17!13 (R=H)]
was sluggish when conducted in dichloromethane
requiring reaction times up to 36 h to proceed to com-
pletion. In contrast, when carrying out the reaction, in
the same pot, in toluene at 70 ꢀC the reaction proceeded
to completion within 3 h to afford 13 (R=H). The usual
filtration of the reaction mixture, after cooling, followed
by evaporation of the filtrate allowed the desired com-
pounds to be isolated in near quantitative yields.
Anthranilic acid route
Solution-phase carbodiimides (Scheme 2). Alternative
retrosynthetic analysis revealed the intermediate ortho-
azidobenzoic acid 9. This can be prepared by diazotisa-
tion and an azide displacement reaction of anthranilic
acids 10 which proceeded very efficiently following lit-
erature precedent.7 Purification of the products was
effected by simply acidifying the reaction mixture
resulting in precipitation of the ortho-azido benzoic acid
products 10, which were obtained after filtration and
drying, in greater than 95% purity and in near quanti-
tative yields, in each case, after removal of the aqueous
solution by filtration. Initial attempts to activate the
ortho-azido acids 9, towards amide bond formation
using conventional solution phase methods (DCCI,
EDCI, HOBt, etc.) met with little success and in no case
was the desired adduct isolated in pure form. In most
instances the activated ester 11 was the main product,
isolated in up to 60% yield along with traces of the
dipolar cycloaddition product 12, even after using
excess amine and elevated temperatures in attempts to
force the reaction to completion.
Scheme 2. Problematic solution-phase route.
Scheme 3. One-pot supported carbodiimide route.