Angewandte
Chemie
hindrance of the substituents on the aryl ring of the cinnamic
acids did not exert a strong influence on the reactivity (3ja vs.
3ka). Aside from the cinnamic acids, naphthyl-substituted
acrylic acid 1l was also effectively transformed into the
corresponding adduct 3la in 58% yield. Furthermore, the
method was proven to be equally effective for heteroaryl-
substituted acrylic acids (3ma, 3na, 3oa, and 3pa). Notably,
when the E-configured substrates 1m and 1n were used, only
the E isomers of the corresponding products were obtained
(3ma and 3na).[12] The high stereoselectivity for the E isomer
can be attributed to the heteroatoms in the ortho position of
the aromatic ring, which coordinate to the copper center
during the catalytic process. Finally, other nitrile-containing
radicals, derived from 2,2’-azobis(2-methylbutyronitrile)
O atom of the product originated from cinnamic acid, as no
18O-containing product was detected. Furthermore, when
a radical scavenger, such as 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol
(BHT) or 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxyl (TEMPO),
was added, the reaction was almost completely suppressed
(see the Supporting Information). These results demonstrated
that a radical process was involved in this reaction.
After confirming the origin of the N and O atoms in the
product, we further explored the roles of the copper and silver
salts. As cinnamic acid could react with CuBr and Ag2CO3 to
form the corresponding salts, the silver and copper cinnamate
salts were prepared separately and subjected to this reaction.
When cinnamic acid was replaced by cinnamoyloxysilver, the
reaction did not take place in the absence of a catalytic
amount of CuBr, revealing that the copper catalyst was
essential for this reaction (Scheme 2c,d). Meanwhile, when
bis(cinnamoyloxy)copper was used as the substrate instead of
cinnamic acid, product 3aa was obtained regardless of the
presence of a stoichiometric amount of Ag2CO3 (Scheme
2e,f). These observations indicate the essential role of copper
as a catalyst and that Ag2CO3 probably acts as an oxidant to
re-oxidize the CuI to a CuII species to close the catalytic cycle.
To get further insights into how the copper bridging
directs and accelerates the electron transfer in this reaction,
we investigated the interaction of the CuII species with the
reactants by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spec-
troscopy.[14] As shown in Figure 1, initially, when a catalytic
amount of CuBr2 was treated with 1a (10 equiv) in DMSO at
1008C for two hours, the resulting solution exhibited a typical
axial CuII EPR signal (line 2), identical to that of a DMSO
solution of CuBr2 (line 1). Moreover, the strong EPR signal of
CuII with a lower g value was further observed when a catalytic
amount of CuBr2 was treated with 1a (10 equiv) and DABCO
(20 equiv) in DMSO at 1008C for two hours. These data
excluded the possibility that cinnamic acid 1a was trans-
formed into an electrophilic radical species by oxidation with
CuBr2 as no electron transfer occurred between the CuII
species and cinnamic acid. Furthermore, a typical axial CuII
EPR signal was also detected when CuBr2 was treated with
AIBN (20 equiv) in DMSO at 1008C for two hours. This
result indicated that SET did not take place between CuBr2
and the isobutyronitrile radical, ruling out the involvement of
an isobutyronitrile ion in the present reaction. Furthermore,
essentially the same CuII EPR signal was observed when
CuBr2 was exposed to AIBN (20 equiv) and cinnamic acid 1a
(10 equiv) in DMSO (1008C, 2 h), indicating that SET could
not occur in the absence of DABCO. We expected that once
DABCO had been introduced to the above system, the
zwitterionic enolate would form, and the SET process should
proceed rapidly. Indeed, when a catalytic amount of CuBr2
was treated with 1a (10 equiv), AIBN (20 equiv), and
DABCO (20 equiv) in DMSO at 1008C, the CuII EPR
signal quickly disappeared within ten minutes (Figure 1b),
and the desired cyclization product 3aa was detected by GC-
MS. Analysis of the copper residue by X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS) indicated that a CuI species had been
formed (see the Supporting Information). These data
excluded the participation of isobutyronitrile ion and enolate
radical intermediates in this reaction and corroborated our
(AMBN)
and
1,1’-azobis(cyclohexane-1-carbonitrile)
(ACCN), also reacted with cinnamic acid (1a) to afford the
corresponding products 3ab and 3ac in 51% and 36% yield,
respectively. The product 3aa could be converted into
À
pyrrolidine-2,5-dione 6 by cleavage of the C N bond upon
exposure to KOH. Furthermore, 3aa could also be used as the
starting material for construction of the N-fused bicyclic
compound 7 in a one-step functional group transforma-
tion.
To get insights into the mechanism of this transformation,
several control experiments were conducted (Scheme 2).
Initially, when 15N-labeled AIBN (the azo nitrogen atoms
were labelled with 15N) was treated with 1a under the
standard conditions, the resulting product was analyzed by
high-resolution mass spectrometry, which showed that the 15
N
atoms of the azo moiety had not been incorporated into the
product. This result confirmed that the N atoms of the
product originated from the nitrile groups of AIBN. More-
over, the addition of two equivalents of H218O showed that the
amide was not formed by hydrolysis with H2O and that the
Scheme 2. Control experiments.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1 – 6
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!