D.-R. Ji et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 25 (2014) 348–350
349
tion includes detail experimental procedures and the spectra data
of all substrates and products.
100.2, 55.9, 55.8, 52.1. IR (KBr, cmꢁ1):
n
2997, 2947, 2834, 1706,
1595, 1500, 1434, 1348, 1257, 1257, 1136, 1034; HRMS (ESI):
Calcd. for C19H16O6Na: m/z 363.0839 ([M+Na]+), found: 363.0841.
2,3,6,7-Tetramethoxyphenanthrene-9-carbonitrile (2e): Yield
85.1%. mp 266–268 8C [16]; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
2.1. General procedure for the preparation of 2,3-disubstituted phenyl
acrylic acid
d 7.99 (s,
1H), 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.71 (s, 1H), 7.50 (s, 1H), 7.18 (s, 1H), 4.15 (s, 3H),
4.14 (s, 3H), 4.08 (s, 3H), 4.05 (s, 3H).
A mixture of homoveratric acid, veratraldehyde, acetic anhy-
dride and triethylamine was stirred and heated at reflux for 24 h
under nitrogen atmosphere. The products were purified and
collected to give (E)-2,3-bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid (1a)
and (Z)-2,3-bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)acrylic acid (1b) [13,14]. By
following the same procedure as above (E)-2-(3,4-dimethoxyphe-
nyl)-3-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)acrylic acid (1c) and (Z)-2-
(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-3-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)acrylic ac-
id (1d) were obtained.
3. Results and discussion
(E)-Methyl 2,3-bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)acrylate (1e) was
used as the substrate to investigate proper reaction conditions
for the desired coupling reaction. The results were summarized in
Table 1. To investigate the influence of DTBP, different quantities
were added and the desired product 2c was obtained in up to 68.8%
yield (Table 1, entries 1–5). Unreacted 1e existed after 1.5 h when
2.0 equiv. DTBP was added. However, when the reaction time was
prolonged to 4 h, the yield improved but 1e still did not react
completely (Table 1, entry 6). Further extension of the reaction
time to 8 h and 24 h did not improve the yield (Table 1, entries 7
and 8). Then, with 2.0 equiv. of DTBP and reaction time unchanged,
changing the dosage of TFA (1 mL, 2 mL, 3 mL, 5 mL, 10 mL), 3 mL
TFA brought a better yield of 72.8% (Table 1, entries 6, 9, 10, 11, 12).
Under the nitrogen atmosphere, the result was not improved
(Table 1, entry 13). Literatures reports suggested that CH2Cl2 was
frequently used in the CDC reactions such as the transformation of
1e–2c [12]. For this method, however, TFA was more suitable than
CH2Cl2 (Table 1, entries 8, 14).
2.2. General procedure for the preparation of methyl 2,3-disubstituted
phenylacrylate
Esterification of 1a in methanol and sulfuric acid in the usual
manner followed by a recrystallization from ethyl acetate afforded
the pure methyl (E)-2,3-bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)acrylate (1e) as
a
white solid. Using the same procedures, (Z)-2,3-bis(3,4-
dimethoxyphenyl)acrylate (1f), methyl (E)-2-(3,4-dimethoxyphe-
nyl)-3-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)acrylate (1g), methyl (Z)-2-
(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-3-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)acrylate
(1h) were also obtained [15].
2.3. Preparation of (Z)-2,3-bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)acrylonitrile
(1i)
Table 1
A mixture of cyanide, veratraldehyde, ethanol, and sodium
ethoxide was stirred and heated to reflux for 2 h. The product was
collected and dried to give 1i as a yellow solid [16].
Optimization of the intramolecular coupling reaction.a
OMe
OMe
MeO
MeO
MeO
2.4. General procedures for the oxidative coupling reaction
COOMe
COOMe
DTBP
solvent, r.t.
To a solution of 1e (0.2 mmol, 71.6 mg) in acetonitrile (2 mL)
was added DTBP (0.2 mmol ꢀ 2 mmol, 58.4 mg) and CF3COOH
(4 mL). The mixture was stirred and the reaction tube was sealed at
room temperature for 4 h and then quenched by water (10 mL).
The aqueous phase was extracted with dichloromethane
(3 mL ꢀ 10 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried over
with MgSO4, filtered, concentrated using a rotary evaporator and
purified by chromatographic column to give the desired product 2c
as a light yellow solid. Coupling reactions of the other substrates
followed the same procedure.
Methyl 2,3,6,7-tetramethoxyphenanthrene-9-carboxylate (2c):
Yield 88.5%. mp 203–204 8C [15]; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
d 8.65
(s, 1H), 8.42 (s, 1H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.76 (s, 1H), 7.26 (s, 1H), 4.14 (s,
3H), 4.13 (s, 3H), 4.08 (s, 3H), 4.04 (s, 3H), 4.02 (s, 3H).
2,3,6,7-Tetramethoxyphenanthrene-9-carboxylic acid (2a):
Yield 91.4%. mp 283–285 8C [13]; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO):
MeO
1e
2c
OMe
OMe
Entry
DTBP (equiv.)
Solvent (mL)
Time (h)
Yieldb (%)
1
2
1.1
1.3
1.5
2.0
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
0
TFA (3)
6.5
6.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
4
Trace
24.1
65.4
68.8
67.6
72.8
65.2
60.7
61.2
68.4
68.3
48.9
67.6
ND
TFA (3)
3
TFA (3)
4
TFA (3)
5
TFA (3)
6
TFA (3)
7
TFA (3)
8
8
TFA (3)
24
9
TFA (1)
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
10
11
12
13c
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21d
22d
TFA (2)
TFA (5)
d
TFA (10)
12.86 (brs, 1H, –COOH), 8.55 (s, 1H), 8.42 (s, 1H, H-30), 8.05 (s, 1H),
8.01 (s, 1H), 7.56 (s, 1H), 4.06 (s, 3H), 4.05 (s, 3H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.89
(s, 3H).
2,3-Methylenedioxy-6,7-dimethoxyphenanthrene-9-carboxyl-
ate acid (2b): Yield 86.4%. mp 265–266 8C [14]; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
TFA (3)
DCM (3)
CH3CN (3)
Toluene (3)
TFA/DCM (2/1)
TFA/DCM (1/1)
TFA/CH3CN (2/1)
TFA/CH3CN (1/1)
TFA/CH3CN (2/1)
TFA/CH3CN (2/1)
ND
ND
21.6
18
88.5
75.6
84.0
ND
CDCl3): d 8.60 (s, 1H), 8.34 (s, 1H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.22 (s,
1H), 6.12 (s, 2H), 4.09 (s, 3H), 4.07 (s, 3H), 4.01 (s, 3H).
Methyl 2,3-methylenedioxy-6,7-dimethoxyphenanthrene-9-
carboxylic (2d): Yield 92.3%. mp. 210–213 8C; 1H NMR
a
Reaction conditions: 1e (0.1 mmol), DTBP (0–2.5 equiv.) in 1–10mL of solvent
(400 MHz, CDCl3):
(s, 1H), 7.22 (s, 1H), 6.12 (s, 2H), 4.09 (s, 3H), 4.07 (s, 3H), 4.01 (s,
3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3):
168.1, 149.9, 149.2, 148.9, 147.1,
130.5, 128.7, 125.6, 125.4, 124.1, 122.1, 106.5, 106.4, 102.5, 101.5,
d 8.60 (s, 1H), 8.34 (s, 1H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.73
was stirred at room temperature for 4 h.
b
Isolated yield.
c
d
At nitrogen atmosphere.
d
At oxygen atmosphere.